posted on Dec, 6 2012 @ 10:10 AM
Lots of interesting stuff about this case in the latest update from Robert Parry, (available at link below) . It would appear that Mr Ben-Menashe has
a growing number of enemies who could be considered suspects in this attack, as is the case it seems with any such people of general integrity who mix
it up in higher circles
With due balanced criticism, as the originator of this news on this particular forum, I have to say I wish Robert Parry could have been a tad more
specific with his sourcing of one particular claim, highlighted in the quote below,
Police are reportedly hoping the detailed samples of the accelerant may help them determine who was behind the attack. The arson squad’s initial
assessment is said to be that the flammable agent was beyond the sort of accelerant used by common criminals. If the substance is indeed
military-grade, a detailed analysis of its composition could indicate the manufacturer and provide other clues to what might be a larger plot,
according to people familiar with the investigation.
All that said, big Kudos to Mr Ben-Menashe.
His recent experience appears to personify the difficulties involved in trying to do the right thing, knowing what he knew - Especially within the
field he was working, which is surely a den of snakes if ever there was one?