It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Raxoxane
Well,if a large portion of those likely to be designated to "scum villages" on account of their behavior are immigrants-JUST DEPORT THEM,for heaven's sake.Instead of creating neighbourhoods crammed with folks who indulge in constant unacceptable+disruptive behaviour to such an extent that society wants them removed-and dump All the "bad apples" together-deport the ones who are not Dutch citizens.Like in England,which is practically a Muslim country by now-I understand that many British dont feel they're living in England anymore,its changed that much,and militant Islamists,among the large Muslim population are to blame for much of that-British people in and around bigger centers are being victimised in their own country-there's been threads on this site about the problems they're having,well,DEPORT THOSE WHO WONT ABIDE BY THE RULES AND CUSTOMS AND ESTABLISHED WAY OF LIFE, OF THE COUNTRY THEY WISH TO LIVE IN.SO SIMPLE.. good grief,why pussyfoot around? You come into a country to live,you respect their way of life-or go back to whence you came.There's more than enough decent folks who'd love to be in these emigrants shoes,to try+ensure a better life for their children-and would be an asset to the country they're allowed to emigrate to.Make it as simple as that-BEHAVE IN A SOCIALLY ACCEPTABLE WAY-OR GTFO.
Originally posted by boncho
reply to post by earthalien50
These people should be evicted/punished for their crimes. The Netherlands should make laws and enforce them. Without a defined law, the government can evict whomever they want. Look at a cop funny, and you are labeled antisocial with a ticket to scum town.
It says there will be a service set up to report problems in the social housing neighbourhoods. So first you object to this but now you are advocating criminalizing these people? Either it's one or the other. You want them to go to jail or live in the "scum villages" ??
The Netherlands is making an option so they jail doesn't become the first one. As far as crime goes, laws can be made for damn near anything. And I suspect, the people that end up the "Scum towns" are probably already guilty of threats, harassment, violence, property destruction, etc.
This is giving them an option so they aren't automatically evicted and left homeless, or not winding up in jail.edit on 3-12-2012 by boncho because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by Unity_99
In reality, since people don't see with eyes that are decent to begin with, some of what they call garbage are the worlds biggest saints, and the ever so proper ones are not going anywhere, for they haven't grown love at all.
When you're born with health, intelligence, stamina, and talents or ability to get ahead or prosper, those are gifts, not things that make you more than equal, they're gifts, allotted you, to see what you will do with them, and whether you will help others. Its a priviledge. One day the test is over.edit on 3-12-2012 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
What does this have to do with people in social housing that are making life difficult for their neighbours? Where I am from the social housing misfits threaten the locals who are trying to stay away from gangs, drugs, violence. If those people are ejected or put under scrutiny is that a bad thing?
They are probably already guilty, you say? That means you can evict or lock them up? I do not want to live in a world where that is the accepted philosophy.
People have a right to live their lives with clearly defined laws. Without these laws, it becomes someone's judgement that determines their fate.
Nuisance gangs
In 2009, 1,341 youth gangs were a cause of nuisance. Nuisance gangs loiter in the neighbourhood, are sometimes noisy and have little respect for others. They cause small fights and vandalism. The behaviour of a nuisance gang can be corrected.
Antisocial gangs
In 2009, 327 youth gangs were a source of antisocial behaviour. Antisocial gangs are provocative, abuse or intimidate other people, are destructive and do not step aside. Such gangs commit petty crime.
Criminal youth gangs
In 2009, there were 92 criminal youth gangs. The members of criminal youth gangs are no strangers to the police. They commit crime for the money, not for the thrill or for prestige. They use violence and steal.
Combating youth nuisance
Gangs commit 75% of youth crime. The government is combating youth crime by:
gathering information on youth gangs in the Netherlands;
intervening promptly so that shoplifting, for example, does not turn into drug dealing;
fast-tracking punishments so that young people are confronted with the consequences of their behaviour.
antisocial behaviour by young people;
antisocial behaviour in entertainment areas due to alcohol or drug use;
antisocial behaviour in residential areas due to road rage, vandalism, etc.;
neighbourhood decay due to graffiti, broken windows, empty houses, litter, etc.
Skaeve Huse is a Danish expression which means something like special houses for special people. It refers to a project in Denmark that has been set up to house people who can no longer be housed through the regular housing system, because of their history as problem- or nuisance tenants. In 2006 Amsterdam adopted the Danish approach by creating a pilot scheme in the harbor area to the west of the city. This project (see below) consists of 6 houses built by Tempohousing. It offers accommodation to a small group of people, often with a history of mental health problems, together with a supervisor. The approach turned out to be successful and more project are expected in Holland. link
Originally posted by earthalien50
Originally posted by boncho
Should their be no punishment/consequences for people who are making living conditions unbearable to the people around them when they are in public housing?
These people should be evicted/punished for their crimes. The Netherlands should make laws and enforce them. Without a defined law, the government can evict whomever they want. Look at a cop funny, and you are labeled antisocial with a ticket to scum town.
.
Bollocks. There are defined laws, but should the laws
be *that* nittypicky to sift out all the tiny loopholes those
scumbags make use of? Don't thinks so. And remember,
it's the Netherlands, not the US. We can look at a cop,
call him a pig and walk on without any problem.
Visiting Amserdam is not like living there.
.
The city of Amsterdam plans to relocate infamous neighborhood terrorizers to caravans or containers in another part of the city. There they will be monitored for a maximum timespan of 6 months by Amsterdam officials, social workers and if needed the police.
By forcibly relocating these terrorizers, the city wants to ensure they will stop being a threat to their environment.
Per year, the city of Amsterdam reportedly deals with 10 or so cases of extreme neighborhood terrorization, like assault, vandalism or other forms of making other peoples life miserable. This happens out of sight of officials, in a sneaky way. Perpetrators are almost never caught red-handed. And that's why today, the city of Amsterdam presents a plan to deal with these people.
The plan focuses on structural terrorization, in cases where victims feel seriously intimidated or threatened. People who cause these types of sentiments in neighbourhoods will receive a yellow card - a warning. If their behaviour does not change, they will receive a red card and will be forcibly relocated.
They will be housed in a temporary housing unit on the edge of the city. Amsterdam is also looking for a permanent location to house neighbourhood terrorizers, that would accommodate a maximum of 10 families.