It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AeonStorm
I'm curious as to how much evidence a person must give in order to observe something as true or false. Does the subject matter or not? If so why?
Originally posted by boncho
You can post personal accounts in the Gray Area.
Although, if you are trying to present a factual account of events to the best of your abilities, instead of simply posting your account, you can also link information from news sources, or other public media to give the reader a information that coincides with your story.
At the end of the day it is simply a personal account, but it's really no different than someone writing a report in any given field. You may link other people's personal accounts of the event, or official reports as well, to give better understanding.
You sort of missed the point Bancho. What would make a story or personal account true for YOU. Do you have protocols in order to define what is true for yourself?
I'm curious as to how much evidence a person must give in order for others to observe an account as true or false. Does the subject matter or not? If so why?
Originally posted by AeonStorm
Does anyone have something more in-depth in regards to what is necessary to prove to themselves or others what is true or not?
There are a few good responses, so far, but I was hoping for more.
Does anyone, say, have a scientific method that they follow?
Could there even be such a thing?
-AS-edit on 3-12-2012 by AeonStorm because: added grammar