It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Biigs
If the teacher did it on purpose to make the kid pee himself, to show the other kids 'play by my rules or end up like him' isnt that terrorism?
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
reply to post by smyleegrl
Stemming the tide of select children from abusing a restroom break I believe is an acceptable practice. What I do not ascribe to is having to "earn" the ability to do so. In this case, this teacher put the child in question into a position of choosing to keep his "boyd bucks" -- a bit more on this later -- or use them; or worse yet, afraid to even ask the teacher if they have none.
Placing them into that situation is just beyond convoluted. I teach my boys that if they have to go and the teacher says no, I gave them permission to go. I will deal with the administrators. Of course the flip-side is I told them if they become disruptive, they are on their own.
Now to the "boyd bucks". Seems the teacher had an inflated sense of self-worth by naming the scheme after herself. As if she were the benevolent dictator that passed out favor, so long as you do as she asked.
Originally posted by Biigs
reply to post by ownbestenemy
The main point is the kid had not been good enough to get an extra bathroom break he obviously needed.
He was amazingly embarrassed and no doubt, given some peer abuse.
The other kids knew it was bad for him and thus fear it happening to them, controlling behavior with fear is certainly technically terrorism, but as you rightly said, i too doubt it was the teachers intention too, however the effect is the rest of the class fearing that happening and i bet they would endeavor to make more Boyd Bucks as a result.
Originally posted by Unity_99
When he was going to school, and any others, I just told him to get up and go to the bathroom whenever he has to go, and told the teachers that was my rule at their meetings. And they agreed with me, but he was still too shy to just stand up and go out of the room, but that was my rule.
Originally posted by Strictsum
I'm not going to say the teachers point system is bad but I think these kids are a little young to use the bathroom break as a prize.
For 5th or 6th graders I don't believe it would be an issue because they can control their bodily functions. A 7 year old should be able to go when they need to.
Ay parent would know this. Why was this teacher so ignorant? Or was she just being a "nazi" and enjoying her power over young children? I don't know, but there needs to be punishment for her so she learns some boundaries.
Originally posted by ownbestenemyWhat kid will buy a bathroom break when they can get candy, pencils, or whatever "prizes" attainable with their "money"?
Originally posted by Cynic
This educator (term used lightly) might re-think the bathroom break policy if a child heads to the front of the class and unloads their bladder all over the teacher's shoes.
What a ridiculous and cruel way to run a classroom.
Originally posted by Cynic
This educator (term used lightly) might re-think the bathroom break policy if a child heads to the front of the class and unloads their bladder all over the teacher's shoes.
What a ridiculous and cruel way to run a classroom.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by Magantice
She is an adult. She made her choice and got the result she wanted, though I likely would have sued just because I hate little Hitlers like those supervisors.