Increasing the moons reflectivity to save Earth?, page


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 2-12-2012 @ 01:54 PM by watchitburn
reply to post by Pervius



That doesn't make any sense.

It would be way easier to just launch all our Nukes here on earth. If we get rid of all the people CO2 would drop off precipitously.

Yes, my way is much more practical and fun


reply posted on 2-12-2012 @ 02:40 PM by MagicWand67
reply to post by Pervius



Altering the light cycle of plants has negative effects on their growth and reproduction.

Plants need their rest just like people do.



reply posted on 2-12-2012 @ 02:51 PM by DocHolidaze
reply to post by Pervius



so if we nuked the moon, and somthing happened to the moon. it is possible that the entire tide system in the oceans will go haywire, possibly damaging the earth, and destroying life. i dont think it would a good gamble.
its the only moon we got, and once its gone, we are gone. plus the extra light generated by glass on the moon would be insignificant, and say by some miracle that it did make enough light to raise photosynthesis, plants are based off a night and day schedual and messing with take could cause mass plant extictions.

epic thread fail.


reply posted on 3-12-2012 @ 04:21 AM by ignorant_ape
reply to post by Pervius



if people want greater ` carbon capture ` by bio-mass - they should reduce deforestation - simples
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



NOAA Doc Strong Evidence They Are and Have Been Spraying Us
  Posted 15 days ago with 36 member flags
Chemtrail Programs Only Cost Us $5 Billion a Year
  Posted 5 days ago with 8 member flags
Cost analysis of aerosol solar radiation management published
  Posted 11 days ago with 6 member flags
How do elites escape chemtrails?
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
ChemTrails over Michigan
  Posted 11 days ago with 3 member flags
Geo-engineering (Chemtrails) and Bible Prophecy
  Posted 15 days ago with 2 member flags