Another Lawsuit against OBAMA - direct threat to safety and security of United States

This case seems to have some legs and standing - its from Florida -

Defendant Barack Hussein Obama is a direct threat to the safety and security of the United States, and its Constitution, which plaintiff must protect and defend by oath," according to the complaint, which was delivered to Secretary of State Ken Detzner today. See full article by by Bob Unruh at; WND

Kind of sad anyone seriously reads WND for a news source.

reply to post by Trustfund




They'll post articles from the Onion if they're attacking Obama

I'm non partisan - and I do not keep in force contracts that have been broken by the other party. (Constitution kept the government in a box)- on 9-11 they decided to murder over 3,000... I think that breaks the box - and breaks my support for a government that has proven to not represent me or my families interests - and posses a grave and deadly threat to society and America. IMO. and sticking your head in the sand and ignoring the facts that have came to light after that fateful morning - I can not see why anyone in their right mind would support such betrayl. and ignore the personal threat these people posses to planet earth

reply to post by 1BornPatriot


Here is a video with news clips from CNN/FOX/MSNBC/CBS along with interviews.....




Also here is a link to my earlier thread on the subject:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Here we go again.

Instead of looking for anti Obama fairy tales why don't you put all the effort into making your speaker do his job?

Clinton cut DOD over half and nobody ever sued him.

Mainly because what he did was classified and nobody could ever bring him to court over what he did....because the public and world can't know.

So how would anyone "sue" Obama? Besides what's unfolding now was all planned long before Obama put on his pants and decided to run for PResidente.

From a partisan standpoint,

Hardly anyone would be against "showing the papers" here if this was a republican president - of that there is little doubt at all. The clamor would be thunderous and the subject would not be let go of nor denigrated in Alinsky fashion until ALL the records were produced, period!!!!

It'd be like getting bitten by a pitt-bull with lockjaw, only way to get it off would be full disclosure from reliable sources.

From a practicle standpoint,

Regardless of politics I can pass an E-Verify check hands down, Have had to show my certified documents for passport and drivers license, my SS# has been the same ALL my life and I filled out a selective service card that will pass muster.

I can assure all here that were I even elected dog-catcher I'd have no problem with showing docs if asked, fact I'd be proud to do so - its really not a big deal.

Why is it different for this man? Whats to fear? Why keep the controversy going? Why spend the money to do so?

He obviously does not care one whit for any of our rights to privacy with the massive violations of personal privacy his administration allows listed all over this board by many posters.

Why so fervent about his?

reply to post by Pervius


This is about the administration NOT keeping their mouths shut and revealing info that not only led to the deaths of the Navy Seals [thanks to VP] but also Obama supposedly leaked vital security intel...

While the Navy SEALS were successful, their identities were revealed only when Biden “was at a dinner at Washington’s Ritz Carlton Hotel and he said, ‘Let me briefly acknowledge tonight’s distinguished honorees. Admiral James Stavridis is a, is the real deal. He can tell you more about and understands the incredible, the phenomenal, the just almost unbelievable capacity of his Navy SEALs and what they did last Sunday… Folks, I’d be remiss also if I didn’t say an extra word about the incredible events, extraordinary events of this past Sunday. As vice president of the United States, as an American, I was in absolute awe of the capacity and dedication of the entire team, both the intelligence community, the CIA, the SEALs. It just was extraordinary.’”

Weeks later, insurgents in Afghanistan shot down a U.S. military helicopter, killing 30 Americans, “most of them belonging to the same elite Navy SEALS unit that killed Osama bin Laden,” the proposed indictment alleges.

“As a direct result of this leak, Shakil Alfridi, a Pakistani doctor who aided the Central Intelligence Agency in tracking down Osama bin Laden, was arrested and sentenced to 33 years in jail when the Pakistani authorities discovered Afridi’s involvement with the CIA after an internal government probe.

“These leaks on national security coming from the White House undermine the men and women who put risks on their lives for us. This is not helpful. I suppose it could have served some short-term political gain, could have … told some nice story,” said U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., now the GOP nominee for vice president.

There are also allegations that Obama “ordered the release of classified intelligence assessments and documents that detail Israel’s most sensitive military zones".




---------- Yes, these are only allegations that have yet to be proven.---------
------------- Only time will tell the out come of all this.----------

reply to post by BritofTexas

Instead of looking for anti Obama fairy tales why don't you put all the effort into making your speaker do his job?

I was temporarily disappointed with the Speaker recently, but now I see the wisdom of his approach. He gave the Prez the opportunity for a bi-partisan compromise, and the Prez thumbed everybody in the nose and refuses to work with Republican members of the House. In my view the Prez made himself look like he's just to into his own agenda to work with others. You know that ol' "doesn't play well with others" syndrome.

This Prez has had a Marxist agenda of redistribution of income and Big Govt welfare Statism and he deserves to be challenged. The people who moved him into place knew that to criticize him would be to unleash the race card. It was the perfect storm to roll in the Socialist plan.