Originally posted by Decon
I'm not sure how to put this in words, but I'll try. I believe at some point secret societies, not just Freemasons, did have a connection with The
Great Architect, and they did this through math. Math is the universal language, this anyone can recognize. Furthermore, it is obvious that many
occult societies had taken it upon themsleves to decipher the language of life through mathematics. This has been happening since man achieved
consciousness of his world. The core numbers in life are Pi and Phi, they are found everywhere from the musical scale to the harmony of galaxies, and
even in our DNA. What does this mean? Are we all just mathematical represenations? Wouldn't that mean each of us is a sequence of numbers with a
certain purpose towards achieving an end. This would mean life is always in balance, and any "imbalance" is simply another mathematical force acting
upon the current forces. I am not a professional, and I do not yet hold enough knowledge to prove any of this, but I believe the universe itself IS
god, the Great Architect of all we have come to know. When we "invent" we are simply recalling knowledge inherited in each of our souls,
mathematically imprinted in our DNA. Can this be what the Ancient Societies were protecting? If so, are there any remnants of these Ancient Secret
Societies in the societies of today? Is there any society I can join to gain knowledge of these things? This is something I want to dedicate my life
to, I have no purpose but to gain knowledge on the universe and its subsets, and their subsets, unto infinity. Even realizing that I myself am a
universe unto myself brings me great calmness. Do I need to achieve complete calmness to achieve the knowledge or visa versa? This is what I have to
say, is there anyone who would like to speak on this?
[edit on 22-10-2004 by Decon]
As a student of the mysteries and a mathematician, I was pleasantly intrigued by your question. What a wonderful way for me to get in on the fun
here!
What is of utmost importance when looking at mathematics as a key to the mysteries is that the whole of mathematics has its origin in empiricism.
That is to say, mathematics is useful in describing nature because it derived from observations about nature.
It is always best to remember that the axioms of geometry are derived from practical observations made over tens of thousands of years as humanity
sought to insure its own survival. Useful information about the world was recalled from generation to generation and eventually written down for the
sake of posterity. Ultimately these fragments of wisdom were grouped according to similarities in their natures and these similiarities gave rise to
the undefined terms and basic axioms of plane geometry.
The rules of geometry, algebra, set-theory, topology, etc. can now be seen to be secondary and even tertiary observations derived from empirical
observations of nature itself.
Now, while man has evolved over the generations in many ways, we are not so far removed from our nomadic ancestors who followed the herds, ate
berries, and made their homes in caves. Like our ancient ancestors we have the same five senses with which to apprehend the world at large (although
Kevin Warwick has experienced ultra-sonic hearing by way of cybernetic implants-- lucky sod!)
In the end, this all adds up to one very boring, very sad reality: "Mathematical constants are not myserioues entities at all."

Pi exists as a constant because we, like our ancient ancestors, look at the moon, see a circle, and based on our visual perception of that circle,
can represent the ratio of the circumference with respect to the diameter using a convenient nomenclature like, say, numerals. The same with Phi, e,
etc.
But imagine an inteligent alien race which doesn't see light in the visible spectrum. Imagine that they see beyond violet and have three
"eye-equivalent" organs spaced AROUND their bodies so that they can see everything going on around them (in the UV and up range) at the same time!

Their perception of the material world would be RADICALLY different from our own; their "brain-equivalent" organs would process sensory input in
a completely different fashion. Wouldn't it stand to reason that, based on their alternate perception of the cosmos, they would develop different
sets of practical observations that would ultimately yield different mathematical systems-- perhaps systems we might not even recognize as
mathematics?
When one considers Godel's "Incompleteness Theorem" (which held that given any system of axioms sufficient to accomplish arithmetic there will
always be theorems within the system which the system's axioms won't be able to prove either true or false) and the annoying feeling of helplessness
it engenders, the idea of an alien system of reasoning equivalent to what we call mathematics-- a system that could hold possible work-arounds for
Godel's theorem, the apparent random order of prime numbers in the set of natural numbers, etc.-- becomes tantalizing.
OK. I've rambled. Sorry if I was vague.