posted on Dec, 5 2012 @ 04:11 PM
Originally posted by AndyMayhew
reply to post by All Seeing Eye
Stonehenge was pretty far inland. It's not covered by marine/tsunami sediments.
Same for Jericho which is much older.
When was this tsunami?
Im not certain of the exact date but the date is around 10,000 years ago, give or take. Something else I recall reading about the subject is
that, it was reported that there was no Moon before the flood.
Many myths and legends say that the Moon rose in the sky after the after-Flood darkness cleared up. Did the Moon cause the Flood?
As with the above mentioned rebound I suppose the opposite could be true as well. A external force such as the Moon making a appearance and using its
gravitational pull to exert a pulling on the continents. This too could also cause tremendous wave action until the planet became accustom to the new
I suppose the timeline could be narrowed down to the date of the "Bottle Neck" of humanity. DNA research indicates that there was a time when
humanity was larger, then a massive culling event.
This study concluded with the possibility that 50 individuals may have founded the entire population of Europe. This evidence is also quite
consistent with a historical global flood. Research is needed on the implications of this data for the flood of Genesis. Certainly, humankind has
undergone a relatively recent (tens of thousands of years at most, within an evolutionary time frame) population bottleneck. However, it must be
further investigated as to the proportionality of evolutionary dates to the creation model, and as to how the molecular clock can be adequately
explained in such a context. Data aiding this understanding has already been published.5
We should also seek to understand genetic evidence in the context of the tower of Babel event. Evidence exists that, after the bottleneck, ‘the
[human] population rebounded in a series of separate, rapid expansions on different continents.’12 This too seems consistent with Biblical events in
Genesis 11. Surely, much research is needed to expand ideas about such genetic evidence to determine its consistency with the Bible and its
inconsistency with, for example, the various evolutionary out-of-Africa models. Different models of human history are hotly debated in the scientific
Maybe its time we stop confusing religion with ancient scriptures and focus on the evidence itself. Regardless of ones religious beliefs, the
writings are there, we just have to learn how it was originally represented.
Edit to add: There is DNA evidence that suggests the "Flood" was actually 4000 years ago as witnessed by this study.
Paternal and maternal DNA lineages reveal a bottleneck in the
founding of the Finnish population
ABSTRACT An analysis of Y-chromosomal haplotypes in
several European populations reveals an almost monomorphic
pattern in the Finns, whereas Y-chromosomal diversity is
significantly higher in other populations. Furthermore, analyses
of nucleotide positions in the mitochondrial control
region that evolve slowly show a decrease in genetic diversity
in Finns. Thus, relatively few men and women have contributed
the genetic lineages that today survive in the Finnish
population. This is likely to have caused the so-called "Finnish
disease heritage"-i.e., the occurrence of several genetic
diseases in the Finnish population that are rare elsewhere. A
preliminary analysis of the mitochondrial mutations that have
accumulated subsequent to the bottleneck suggests that it
occurred about 4000 years ago, presumably when populations
using agriculture and animal husbandry arrived in Finland.
edit on 5-12-2012 by All Seeing Eye because: (no reason given)