It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
. Yours? From a New Age video. Now, who is the lazy one here?
The higher a person is on the scale, the higher the rate of vibration will be. Here, The All is purported to be at an infinite level of vibration, almost to the point of being at rest. There are said to be millions upon millions of varying degrees between the highest level, The All, and the objects of the lowest vibration. Mental Transmutation is described as the practical application of this principle. To change one's mental state is to change vibration.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by buddhasystem
. Yours? From a New Age video. Now, who is the lazy one here?
Assumptions; none of my 'knowledge' came from YouTube. I have a library of over 3,000 occult texts.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by buddhasystem
More assumptions on your part certainly don't help anything either. So what books, written by free thinkers, aren't to be trusted? You are just ludicrous...
Every once in a while I'll run across a claim that is so wildly ridiculous that I question, for a time, if it is meant as a joke. Sadly, the majority of them aren't. As hard as it is for me to believe, given that we currently live in the most scientifically and technologically advanced society that the Earth has ever seen, there are a lot of people who believe stuff that is unrefined bull#.
I ran into an example a few days ago, when a friend sent me this article, entitled "Scientists Prove DNA Can Be Reprogrammed By Words And Frequencies." The word "frequency" always acts like a red flag to me, as it is for some reason a word woo-woos like a lot, and throw about in absurd ways despite its having a rigid, and not especially thrilling, definition in the scientific world (three others are "energy," "vibration," and "field").
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by buddhasystem
More assumptions on your part certainly don't help anything either. So what books, written by free thinkers, aren't to be trusted? You are just ludicrous...
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by Bedlam
The purpose of rituals, is that it is to be worked on a ritual basis.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
However, I'm assured there would be a few people to disagree with you.
Originally posted by Bedlam
But we've got a compendium of various grimoires. They're all quite odd.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Originally posted by Bedlam
But we've got a compendium of various grimoires. They're all quite odd.
These were probably the grimoires on database design.
That could be secret. The people that say the incantations don't work for them might not be getting the pronunciations quite right. Maybe they forgot to trill the r's?
Originally posted by Bedlam
I find I generally have to read SQL out loud, an arthame in hand, my wizard robes on, with a nice fumigant burning in a brazier, in a voice of yearning plangency. You really have to pop the t's and trill the r's too, or the SQL gods will ignore your plea.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
That could be secret. The people that say the incantations don't work for them might not be getting the pronunciations quite right. Maybe they forgot to trill the r's?
Originally posted by Bedlam
I find I generally have to read SQL out loud, an arthame in hand, my wizard robes on, with a nice fumigant burning in a brazier, in a voice of yearning plangency. You really have to pop the t's and trill the r's too, or the SQL gods will ignore your plea.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by Bedlam
The purpose of rituals, is that it is to be worked on a ritual basis. Much like the ceremonies used to bless crop growth. However, I'm assured there would be a few people to disagree with you.
Let's not forget John Dee or Edward Kelly, who worked for Elizabeth the I practicing things that got the average man got burned at the stake for.