Don't link me to other posts to make your argument.
I asked you a genuine question about what you meant by evidence.
I had already used my knowledge of science to back up my claims that life could mean a variety of things. This was to help Druscilla in seeing the
range of what we have to consider life.
You're saying I should re read the title because I believe life already exists? Just because I don't agree with the OP, that's not to say I didn't
While there is no solid evidence, I talked about the possibility in a way to argue Druscilla's point. I agree with the other members - There is
evidence of life.
I read that post. That post talks about shared views.
What about evolution - That has a wide share of views and yet it is taught in many instances throughout the world.
Just because the thread title says so, I'm not allowed to believe life exists?
The author of the post then goes on to talk about single cell life as not good enough for the public.
What does that have to do with being correct?
Life is life, no matter what form.
Microbial life does not at all mean life will be found everywhere. Even microbial life have to have the right conditions to be able to survive.
Maybe for the people that can't recognize microbial life as significant than it may be so that only advanced life will amaze them. This is because
some people don't realize microbial life still carry out complex processes and means the potential for more existence of life.
The author even talks about what we want, thinking all we want to see is advanced life. While that would be a treat, I can appreciate what microbial
life means. According to evolution, we were once single cell creatures (protista). Life such as Monera, would even be interesting to find.
It's logical to postulate. Just like evolution is a logical explanation.
Maybe you should at my earlier post. I was simply showing the different ways life could be found, to show that there is a variety of different
What you term as evidence is different to me because of my subjects i chose to study I seem to have a different view of evidence. But you must be
right. After all yours is opinion.
@Druscilla - What do you mean you look at the realistic situation. i think it's unrealistic that it doesn;t exist. Either you didn't read my post
earlier or didn't understand it but possibility of life is not unrealistic. You are confusing normal with realistic.
edit on 2-12-2012 by
curiousrb because: (no reason given)