We all knew that the fix was worse than the accident. The corexit was a coverup so we didn't see the oil. This is some new evidence that shows how
coverups just make things worse. I thought it tripled the problem but it was much worse than that.
Hope this has not been posted before, if it has the mods can remove it. I know someone who works for a sewer plant and she told me that is bad
stuff. Here is the link, I don't know how to post offsite stuff and am not sure how to legally do it.
This chemical was approved by our government. Isn't it the responsibility of our government to make sure something is safe before it is allowed to be
used like this? What do we pay these people in the government to do? They take the word of these chemical companies as long as they are insured and
the proceeds of the settlement go to Washington to support the system and not the people. I don't blame BP for this at all, I blame the system. I
have used chemicals that were deemed as safe only to find they were no longer allowed to be sold. What about all of you, what have we been exposed to
and what effects will it have on future generations.
edit on 30-11-2012 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)
TOMORROW: Obama Administration To Offer More Than 20 Million Acres in Western Gulf of Mexico for Oil and Natural Gas Exploration and Development
November Sale Will Offer All Available Unleased Areas in the Western Gulf of Mexico, Only Latest in a Series of Recent Major Offshore Oil and Gas
Contact: Blake Androff (DOI) 202-208-6416
John Filostrat (BOEM) 504-731-7815
WASHINGTON – Tomorrow, as part of President Obama’s all-of-the-above energy strategy to continue to expand safe and responsible domestic energy
production, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) will hold an oil and gas lease sale that will make more than 20 million offshore acres
available, and represents all unleased areas in the Western Gulf of Mexico Planning Area. The Western Gulf of Mexico Lease Sale builds on two major
Gulf of Mexico lease sales in the past year alone, a 21 million acre sale held last December and a 39 million acre sale held in June.
“At President Obama’s direction, his Administration continues to implement a comprehensive, all-of-the-above energy strategy, expanding domestic
production, reducing our dependence on foreign oil, and supporting jobs,” said Interior Secretary Ken Salazar. “Developing public energy resources
in the Gulf of Mexico continues to generate much needed revenue for local communities while helping to power our nation and fuel our economy.”
I might be wrong about this but I'm pretty sure the EPA said not to use Corexit due to toxicity back in 2010 but BP or who ever did the "clean-up"
used it anyway. I'll to try and find the source.
EPA believes BP should use as little dispersant as necessary and, on May 23, Administrator Jackson and then-Federal On-Scene Coordinator Rear Admiral
Mary Landry directed BP to reduce dispersant usage by 75 percent from peak usage.
It's the most toxic dispersant ever made. It is illegal in other countries, but our government still insists it will get the jobs done even though so
many people have become sick or died from it's affects. Just goes to show that MONEY>LIFE. sad but true
Also imagine what hurricane isaac and sandy have brought onto the land from all of that mess. It makes you wonder..
edit on 30-11-2012 by
Unconditionaltruth because: Stuff
Both the dispersants used by BP were preapproved by the EPA for this kind of disaster. These dispersants or similar ones would probably have been
used by any company that would have had a disaster. I question if the government even tested the replacements, I find that they usually just switch
to another product without testing. Under the existing structure, if there is no evidence proving something is unsafe, it has little liability
attached to it. Don't test it for broadform results and you can't be held liable. Test for specific parameters and you are liable only for those
Very true. The science behind it's effectiveness is so flawed it'll make you want to kick yourself.
So this 'scientist' is defending the effectiveness of this product, but any logical minded person would have to ask: "wouldn't it be better to leave
the oil on top of the water? "
it's easier for the ships to skim it off the top of the water than to have to find a net big enough to get the oil that's settling on the bottom from
this chemical, let alone poison the water and marine life in the process.
If they let it float and scooped as much as possible up and let the natural bacteria eat the rest of what's left, then this whole ordeal would have
been avoided and nobody would have been poisoned or hurt in the process, but it only makes the situation look deliberate in my honest opinion.
Sorry broken link I guess. On a cell phone
edit on 30-11-2012 by Unconditionaltruth because: Link
They could have skimmed the oil on the top and sent it somewhere to be cleaned and used. They should do preparation for things like that, not trying
to cover things up. The oil on the surface is natural to a point, the chemicals mixed in it aren't. I'm sure there were vast natural oil slicks in
the past but the earth recovered. Those were natural though, they don't happen that often. These kind of oil spills are not natural and would be a
lot more common if we let them keep doing it without rules.
I can not give you a correct count of life taken, as new stories are occurring everyday and bp would downplay it for fear of being sued, but evidence
is there from personal family stories online trying to get people to help from anyone because its hard to prosecute when symptoms are hard to link
with the chemical because 'science' deems there is no connection to corexit.
The clean-up crews have all posted stories online of becoming extremely Ill after going out to clean it up. The families of the victims have stated
they also got sick from being around their spouses when returning. Sorry I can't link anything from my phone, but a simple search will reveal much
evidence in no time.
The marine life is pretty much undeniable. Dolphins, fish etc. Washing up on shore and people making outrageous claims that supernatural forces or so
to speak 'haarp' did it all when a logical answer would be chemical exposure. Don't get me wrong, haarp is real and animals die from it like the
burned dolphins, but I feel the majority of the deaths were chemically induced. Im not claiming what I'm speaking is 100% truth, but an open mind and
investigative research point towards what I am claiming to be correct
Exactly. We are well aware of the consequences when adding a chemical to something natural. It is just a shame we have to be witness to this idiocracy
we live in, but keeping people aware and informed is all we can do with the information that is present. Good observational skills, keep up the good
I wonder if hharp was created along with rumors to steer many people away from the truth. It seems like Hharp could be a coverup to split people up.
It would be beneficial for a government to distract us from something else going on. They do it using the Media all the time. It could be a
diversion as some say, but a lot of increase in our extreme weather has come since they started that Collider. Is this just a coincidence? I cannot
tell, they need to shut it and all these colliders down for a while to know. Spin anything in a circle and it creates an effect. Doesn't matter if
it is just electrons.
The Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.
All content copyright 2014, The Above Network, LLC.