It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KSigMason
Wealth redistribution via higher percentage Death Tax is a stupid and foolish idea, but that's just me.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by KSigMason
Wealth redistribution via higher percentage Death Tax is a stupid and foolish idea, but that's just me.
Which is my point.
If I found out that everything I accumulated would be taken upon my death without any direction from me I would spend it all on crap that they could not seize before allowing the government to take a nickel. This would defeat the purpose of trying to confiscate assest in some sort of bizarre wealth redistribution scheme. People would circumvent the parameters and there would end up being less then if they just left everyone alone.
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by KSigMason
Wealth redistribution via higher percentage Death Tax is a stupid and foolish idea, but that's just me.
Which is my point.
If I found out that everything I accumulated would be taken upon my death without any direction from me I would spend it all on crap that they could not seize before allowing the government to take a nickel. This would defeat the purpose of trying to confiscate assest in some sort of bizarre wealth redistribution scheme. People would circumvent the parameters and there would end up being less then if they just left everyone alone.
Seems as if the masons have a long way to go before they make you into a better person.
We come into this world with nothing, we leave this world with no material possessions.
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
We come into this world with nothing, we leave this world with no material possessions.
Originally posted by network dude
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by KSigMason
Wealth redistribution via higher percentage Death Tax is a stupid and foolish idea, but that's just me.
Which is my point.
If I found out that everything I accumulated would be taken upon my death without any direction from me I would spend it all on crap that they could not seize before allowing the government to take a nickel. This would defeat the purpose of trying to confiscate assest in some sort of bizarre wealth redistribution scheme. People would circumvent the parameters and there would end up being less then if they just left everyone alone.
Seems as if the masons have a long way to go before they make you into a better person.
We come into this world with nothing, we leave this world with no material possessions.
Well then, since December 21, 2012 is coming very soon, how about you send me 90% of what you have so you can be sure to go out with close to nothing. I'll send you the account number to deposit into. k?
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
We come into this world with nothing, we leave this world with no material possessions.
I am well aware of the, 'you can't take it with you adage'. However mine is modified with, 'and the government won't take it from me'.
I will not work my entire adult life to fund other people's vision of utopia. If I accumulate assets it is up to me to disburse them as I see fit upon my death. Not you, not the government, not anyone. This has nothing to do with Masonry and everything to do with principal.
But that's a utopian pipe dream. What are you, 20? You probably think Ayn Rand and Lyndon LaRouche had good ideas… Such a "scheme" could never happen in the real world.
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
But you are thinking with a narrow mind. The 'scheme' would apply to EVERYONE. Therefore everyone's assets would get an even distibution (in theory), so it would be irrelevent you deciding.
It's a scheme to make people LESS materialistic, which is a good thing.
What a world it would be if all the scientists, thinkers, doctors, nurses etc etc turned around and said 'you know what, all the knowledge I have in my head is mine, and I will decide who I help.'
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
But you are thinking with a narrow mind. The 'scheme' would apply to EVERYONE. Therefore everyone's assets would get an even distibution (in theory), so it would be irrelevent you deciding.
Originally posted by JoshNorton
But that's a utopian pipe dream. What are you, 20?
You probably think Ayn Rand and Lyndon LaRouche had good ideas… Such a "scheme" could never happen in the real world.
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by OratoryHeist
spoken like a true communist.
Here in the real world, things don't work like that.
Your math is great until your factor in greed. Once that happens, all bets are off.
You work hard, save up some money and hopefully spend it all just before you die. Problem is, if you spend it all and you are still living, you messed up. So you have to be a little conservative or you will end up being someone else's pain in the ass. Don't be that guy.
Originally posted by KSigMason
reply to post by OratoryHeist
Why do we have a long way to go? How is wanting freedom from government intrusion counter to our teachings of betterment?
reply to post by OratoryHeist
There is a flaw in the communal belief since not everyone is created exactly. We all different skills and abilities, and because for such things, we each will accumulate different amounts of property (whether land, material, monetary, etc.).
Your and the OPs theory would stifle creativity and innovation because no one will have an incentive to do well.
I try to excel to make a better life, not necessarily for me, but for my family. If my property is going to be stolen from my family why would I continue to gather wealth (in whatever form) if my family will not prosper from it?
Your theory only breeds dependency upon the government because it surrounds the government dispensing the stolen wealth. Government is filled incompetency, corruption, and this theory, history proves, would do no good. This wealth redistribution would be plagued with failures and fraud.
reply to post by JoshNorton
It is a very naive belief isn't it?
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
But you are thinking with a narrow mind. The 'scheme' would apply to EVERYONE. Therefore everyone's assets would get an even distibution (in theory), so it would be irrelevent you deciding.
Which inspires nothing but mediocrity at best. Why should I work harder then anyone else when everything I make may go to people who have less drive and ambition then me? This philosophy benefits the people who sit on their ass.
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
So basically what you are saying is that you are fueled by jealousy of other people. Running yourself into the ground just to be momentarily better than your neighbor.
Assuming you do, why do you work harder than anyone else?
If you had no money worries for the rest of your life, what would you do with your life? Amass more? Learn more?
I think you'll find that if you take an objective view of the world around you, you will realise that we are living in sub-mediocrity, when we could be realising so much more.
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
Originally posted by network dude
reply to post by OratoryHeist
spoken like a true communist.
Name calling already. Be the better man Network Dude.
Here in the real world, things don't work like that.
Your math is great until your factor in greed. Once that happens, all bets are off.
Why do we have greed? Because the system is imbalanced. The current system encourages selfishness, greed, hoarding. We are not encouraged to share. We are encouraged to desire the material.
You work hard, save up some money and hopefully spend it all just before you die. Problem is, if you spend it all and you are still living, you messed up. So you have to be a little conservative or you will end up being someone else's pain in the ass. Don't be that guy.
So don't go spending it all. As I've said, the current system encourages selfishness and greed, traits you are exhibiting with your comments.
...we realise we worked ourselves into the ground for what? For a mound of stuff we cannot take with us.
Wrong. The current system stifles creativity. The current system is only about amassing material wealth, finding new ways of making more money. Take a look at the world, where is the creativity? Creativity?
Shouldn't your family be doing the same thing that you are, making a better life?
If you are willing to provide for your family, then why are you unwilling to provide for your 'bigger family'?
We are all on this orb together, we should be sharing it all.
You are a superior mind are you? Judging by the comments you have all made, I see a bunch of selfish, greedy individuals, who are blinded by the material world. The lack of thought, compassion and understanding towards your fellow man is astounding.
Originally posted by OratoryHeist
Assuming you do, why do you work harder than anyone else? If you had no money worries for the rest of your life, what would you do with your life? Amass more? Learn more?