It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
AE911truth.org, Monday, Dec 08, 2008.
In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at freefall, but the cover-up was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged freefall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance. ae911truth
A loud, low-frequency "boommmm" can be heard just before the east penthouse of WTC 7 falls.
David Chandler will soon be publishing a video that contains a more in depth analysis of this footage, including audio enhancements of the explosion.
“he set the charges-set, boom, it collapses”
( you can also hear at that same time on the radio: “into the dive hole!” as you can hear the explosion…..)
“he came back twenty minutes later looking like a three stooges movie all covered in plastic I swear to god” Man 2 “do yah got good Sh*t in there?”
“that’s good Sh*t”.
“don’t look back there”
Man 2 “Who-hoo-hoo-hoo”
“allllriiiight” (inaudible)“come on back?”
anyone have audio enhancing software? Help!""
You claim this 1,3-diphenylpropane is a smoking gun or whatever of sol-gel thermite.
Yet then you go on and say it was special TB explosives. Then you claim the explosives were hushed (magically) so that only ULF can pick it up and seismic stations.
I would love to see one real example of a demolition that had its high power explosives hushed with water.
1,3-diphenylpropane. It is found in many plastics. You just had three large office building HowardRoark does a good job of putting your claims to rest and brings up quite a bit of interesting information you left out. 1,3-diphenylpropan- [ 1',1'-(1,3-propanediyl)bis-benzene] is the full item that was found. It was in the air.
1,3-diphenylpropane. It is found in many plastics.
LaBTop : You will only obtain 1,3-diphenylpropane in a specific test mixture 2, and at low yields, at a very specific temperature.
In the case of the burning WTC buildings and burning post-collapse debris heaps, there are very different temperature ranges to take in consideration (see NASA's hot spots measured by their planes), and when we consider temperatures above the fixed temperature of 380° C in above tests, I can asure you that the probability of increased occurrences of derivatives of 1,3-diphenylpropane will increase logarithmically with higher temperatures.
Not even considering, the totally different setup of all constituents in these WTC fires.
I would suggest you to find the make-up of the plastics used in the manufacturing of computer monitors and housings, and keyboards, since you or your links expect them to be the source of that specific 1,3-diphenylpropane derivative at decomposing temperatures.
HowardRoarke: And you are right; it is a moot point since that is not the compound detected in the air samples.
LaBTop : I posted quite a long excerpt out of the Sierra Report in your new thread around Prof. Jones and Kevin Ryan's remark about 1,3-diphenylpropane as a compound in aero gels used to mold explosive thermite charges.
(Your new thread : www.abovetopsecret.com... )
It is full of remarks about sampling of DPP in DUST samples.
Which has not been done by EPA, btw. And the sampling they did, was, amazingly, done with out of date methods and aperati.
It were outsourced firms which directed us to their very strange way of sampling of DUST, AIR and WATER, during the -critical for sampling taking- first weeks of such an immense historical happening on US soil.
They did not use f.ex. their own stringent advises for asbestos sampling in their own offices, but a totally outdated method.
And accepted the removal of a stringent warning in their first report on 26 September 2001. And let it be replaced by a confirmation that it was save to return to work for all New Yorkers.
How about that for criminal behavior of the White House (who forced them to do so) and compliance at their side?
[edit on 24/7/06 by LaBTop]
Originally posted by GenRadek
reply to post by LaBTop
As for Craig Bartmer:
What exactly got his attention to the WTC7 collapse? I do not recall him saying anything about a low frequency boom or anything like that. Interesting how standing next to it, he noticed nothing wrong until people started yelling its collapsing. Why would he leave that out? How the hell do you miss a blast like that while standing right next to the bloody building and forget to mention that? I know he heard boom boom boom, as the building fell, where was it before it started?
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by LaBTop
So did your ULF corroborate with any of the other 30 or so recordings of WTC collapsing? Or is on only one just that one video? And if so, what would be the conclusion?
Originally posted by LaBTop
We know that CNN was infected a few weeks before already. Others for sure were too. Who probably had only one task : filter everything out what can indicate explosions.
Originally posted by LaBTop
He said he stood only a few feet under the umbrella of debris bursting out from the lower floors. That means that the penthouse wasn't moving yet on top of those 47 floors. He went running, and THEN he heard the BOOOM,BOOMM, BOOOMMM's.
We know that CNN was infected a few weeks before already. Others for sure were too. Who probably had only one task : filter everything out what can indicate explosions. And that's SOUND.