Egyptian Stone Vases-The Smoking Gun In The Advanced Technology Debate?, page 10


Pages: <<  7    8    9    10    11    12    13  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 55 times


reply posted on 9-12-2012 @ 09:51 AM by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by Philippines
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by Harte
Hand waving, this time with a few arm flaps.

Harte


I'll take that as a concession. You know you can't dispute the marks because there is no way around the fact they were caused by high speed tools and that is the slippery slope you guys just don't want to go down. It's simple but impossible to get around and you know it.


More hand waving again.

These marks have been completely explained, according to every detail you've provided.

Of course, you can't provide any of the requested detail.

Just the waving.

Harte


what are you talking about? nothing you've provided has been conclusive. could you do me a favor and show me where someone demonstrates how hand tooling leaves high speed marks?


How about you support the claim that these are "high speed marks?"

And not with another quote from Dunn.

You criticize the evidence I and others have provided, while providing absolutely nothing to back up your own claims.

This is called trolling.

Harte
edit on 12/8/2012 by Harte because: (no reason given)


"evidence" you've provided has been baloney. take one of the diagrams for example of the core drill bow saw. Don't you think the wooden stick shaft would grind down before the granite? This all sounds easy on paper but so far I haven't seen anything actually being replicated to these levels of sophistication.


Are you proof reading what you're typing? I suppose if you're trying to drill into granite with a wooden shaft/boring bit, you will probably grind down the stick, you're right. However, the thread is discussing using copper tubes as the boring bit, and with abrasives and time you will erode/drill the stone away.

Perhaps you would be better off trying to explain how Ed Leedskalnin created coral castle. I think if you can explain how he drilled and moved the stones there, you could then compare his technology to the egyptians.

Coral Castle


I found this interesting concerning Leedskalnin's nine ton gate, "Then, in 1986, the gate stopped opening. A team of engineers was brought in for consultation. In order to remove the gate, six men and a 50 ton crane were utilized. Once the gate was removed. it was discovered that Ed had centered and balanced the nine-ton piece of rock on an old truck bearing. He had drilled an almost perfectly round hole from top to bottom of the eight-foot-tall gate with no electric tools. Today , a laser-controlled high speed drill would be used to do the same work. "


reply posted on 9-12-2012 @ 12:46 PM by will2learn
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to
post by will2learn


I support the idea that a wide range of high tech tools were used early on and later after the owners of the technology left the people tried to emulate their work.


Do you follow Dunn's ridiculous excuse that the 'advanced tools' either rotted, being so high tech or the owners took all the tools with them? Despite this we have brass and bronze, silver and other artifacts in the arcaheological record, yet not a single high tech machine. The best they can find is some plate from a scepter or a siva disk that happens to have 'teeth' around the edges.

When are these guys going to realize that what is found is what they had to work with. Tools that can deliver megawatts of light energy HAVE been found in the museums. Any fool can use them to vaporize lines in stone, it takes a craftsman with a potters wheel or a similar mechanical device to make these sorts of ooparts. No new parts or complete machines have to be imagined, no wonder the mainstream laughs this sort of stuff off its easy.

See Jordans site for Ancient Solar Stone Cutting Techniques or better still see the video links of ppl using this tech its easier than dreaming up excuses for Dunn's work. I thought the GPP was hilarious, read it again and it was even funnier. He does at least put old observations into terms we can all understand, for that we can thank him. His ideas on antiquity seem to be biased by 50 years at the grindstone and a couple of years using weak lasers

Will



reply posted on 9-12-2012 @ 01:34 PM by Beavers
reply to post by mcx1942



The pyramids are believed to have started construction in 2584 BC, you think they built the pyramids without some kind of pulley system?

What's 300 years between pottery and a world wonder, I wonder?


reply posted on 10-12-2012 @ 08:02 AM by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by will2learn
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to
post by will2learn


I support the idea that a wide range of high tech tools were used early on and later after the owners of the technology left the people tried to emulate their work.


Do you follow Dunn's ridiculous excuse that the 'advanced tools' either rotted, being so high tech or the owners took all the tools with them? Despite this we have brass and bronze, silver and other artifacts in the arcaheological record, yet not a single high tech machine. The best they can find is some plate from a scepter or a siva disk that happens to have 'teeth' around the edges.

When are these guys going to realize that what is found is what they had to work with. Tools that can deliver megawatts of light energy HAVE been found in the museums. Any fool can use them to vaporize lines in stone, it takes a craftsman with a potters wheel or a similar mechanical device to make these sorts of ooparts. No new parts or complete machines have to be imagined, no wonder the mainstream laughs this sort of stuff off its easy.

See Jordans site for Ancient Solar Stone Cutting Techniques or better still see the video links of ppl using this tech its easier than dreaming up excuses for Dunn's work. I thought the GPP was hilarious, read it again and it was even funnier. He does at least put old observations into terms we can all understand, for that we can thank him. His ideas on antiquity seem to be biased by 50 years at the grindstone and a couple of years using weak lasers

Will
I agree with him that tools were used that were far beyond what contemporary theorists are suggesting. After that we may somewhat agree on some things and some other things he says are interesting but I don't necessarilly agree with him on everything he says. the gist is they had advanced tools, I believe they were taken by their owners off planet. that's why you don't find them.

I can imagine that the things which were actually made by hand were done to emulate the originals.


reply posted on 10-12-2012 @ 08:48 AM by will2learn
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by will2learn
Originally posted by bottleslingguy
reply to
post by will2learn


I support the idea that a wide range of high tech tools were used early on and later after the owners of the technology left the people tried to emulate their work.


Do you follow Dunn's ridiculous excuse that the 'advanced tools' either rotted, being so high tech or the owners took all the tools with them? Despite this we have brass and bronze, silver and other artifacts in the arcaheological record, yet not a single high tech machine. The best they can find is some plate from a scepter or a siva disk that happens to have 'teeth' around the edges.

When are these guys going to realize that what is found is what they had to work with. Tools that can deliver megawatts of light energy HAVE been found in the museums. Any fool can use them to vaporize lines in stone, it takes a craftsman with a potters wheel or a similar mechanical device to make these sorts of ooparts. No new parts or complete machines have to be imagined, no wonder the mainstream laughs this sort of stuff off its easy.

See Jordans site for Ancient Solar Stone Cutting Techniques or better still see the video links of ppl using this tech its easier than dreaming up excuses for Dunn's work. I thought the GPP was hilarious, read it again and it was even funnier. He does at least put old observations into terms we can all understand, for that we can thank him. His ideas on antiquity seem to be biased by 50 years at the grindstone and a couple of years using weak lasers

Will
I agree with him that tools were used that were far beyond what contemporary theorists are suggesting. After that we may somewhat agree on some things and some other things he says are interesting but I don't necessarilly agree with him on everything he says. the gist is they had advanced tools, I believe they were taken by their owners off planet. that's why you don't find them.

I can imagine that the things which were actually made by hand were done to emulate the originals.


Does Dunn add 'off the planet' answers to the where are the tools question? I guess thats where you diverge in opinion, but Dunn's microwave beam was being sent in to space for no apparent reason so its not that far off of his viewpoint

Anything can have been taken off the planet leaving no trace at all so just about anything is possible. Why stop at advanced machine working stones. The stones could have been created from a matter generator. Most working in this field have to set limits on the imagination, its nice to speculate, but what can be proven?

Will


reply posted on 12-12-2012 @ 02:30 PM by will2learn
reply to post by Stormdancer777



One guy did it with the Solar Sinter Project, used a computer but a potter's wheel could have achieved these designs with the same technique.


reply posted on 13-12-2012 @ 10:58 AM by Harte
Originally posted by will2learn
reply to
post by bottleslingguy



How do you think they got here in the first place?

Will


Remote controlled, disposable pyramids were sent down to the surface first so that they could find their way down.

Who knew aliens don't know up from down?

Of course, earlier, other remote controlled pyramids must have been sent down to guide those other remote controlled pyramids down, ad infinitum.

Obviously, that's why there's so many pyramids around the world!

Harte


reply posted on 13-12-2012 @ 06:15 PM by bottleslingguy
Originally posted by will2learn
reply to
post by bottleslingguy



How do you think they got here in the first place?

Will


no idea but it makes sense they came here from somewhere else because they already had reached a certain level of technological sophistication. I don't doubt there could have been many types of sentient beings here throughout the planet's history. Why not?

We may be coming out of a deep sleep as a species by accepting these ideas. Or maybe we're going to be blasted back to the stone age on the 21st
Pages: <<  7    8    9    10    11    12    13  >>    ^^TOP^^



More Mysterious Nazca Lines From Space
  Posted 6 days ago with 124 member flags
The Aztec and Norse god of war are both missing one hand.
  Posted 17 days ago with 48 member flags
63,000-Year-Old Modern Human Skull Found in Laos
  Posted 18 days ago with 38 member flags
Multiple Human Species Were Likely The Norm
  Posted 11 days ago with 37 member flags
The Sumerian \'Flood-Storm\' weapon.
  Posted 6 days ago with 18 member flags