Justification for Taking Hostages?, page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 24-10-2004 @ 09:39 PM by vincere7
Originally posted by ZeroDeep
vincere7,

I'll make this short. OSAMA BIN LADEN DID NOT ATTACK OUR COUNTRY FOR ALLAH, HE USES ALLAH AS JUSTIFICATION, BUT IT WAS NOT THE PRIMARY REASON FOR ATTACK.

America, being the "fighters of truth and liberty" should not been in Iraq in the first place, these "hostage takings" would not have occured in that case...

Deep


So now it's 'our' country. Your trying to distance yourself from your earlier statements but it's too late for that now. So now you are going to preach about Osama's mind. You are going to tell us his thoughts. Please feel free to give us your fantasy of Osama's thoughts...

We were not in Iraq in the FIRST place. We are there because our nation was attacked and we are on the offensive.

quote: I personnally have nothing against any muslim....I take them like I take all people.... as they come and on thier merits. Ive met more I like than a lot of so called "christians" and "humanitarians"

I do have something personal. I don't want my McDonalds exploding or airplanes smashing into my work place and I have muslim friends and have studied the Quran.. hows that for education deep.

The spin goes on. This discussion between two people went from the teachings of Islam to "all muslims are labeled as killers," for the sake of an individual (deep) who claims NOT to be muslim but supports his/her own ideology of what Islam is and what Islam teaches and that persons (deep)justification of the attacks on our soil.

The U.S. was attacked and now we are attacking. Whether you are a peace loving muslim or a fanatic you still must believe what the Quran teaches IF you are a muslim. If you don't agree with the teachings then you are not really a muslim.












[edit on 24-10-2004 by vincere7]


reply posted on 24-10-2004 @ 10:17 PM by ZeroDeep


The spin goes on. This discussion between two people went from the teachings of Islam to "all muslims are labeled as killers," for the sake of an individual (deep) who claims NOT to be muslim but supports his/her own ideology of what Islam is and what Islam teaches and that persons (deep)justification of the attacks on our soil.

The U.S. was attacked and now we are attacking. Whether you are a peace loving muslim or a fanatic you still must believe what the Quran teaches IF you are a muslim. If you don't agree with the teachings then you are not really a muslim.



I'm not a muslims, get that through your head. Any of the senior members who know me can vouch for that.



I do have something personal. I don't want my McDonalds exploding or airplanes smashing into my work place and I have muslim friends and have studied the Quran.. hows that for education deep.



Let's get something clear, you having Muslim freinds and having "studied" the Quran is quite the conundrum; You vemently have this faux denotion that Islam is simply out to prosecute and kill Kafirs, yet, do not bring forth valid proof of this other than the work of Osama Bin Laden. Tell me, good sir, Jewish Zionists had thier own Prime Minister killed in cold blood, and if one reads the Torah, we seem many instances of genocidal conotations, in fact, they are quite overt, as it were, should we label all Jews as evil and vile creatures on the verge of utter destruction of mankind ?

If Islamic followers were bent on killing Kafirs, as i have stated many times before, you and I, good sir, would not be here typing this very message.

Deep


reply posted on 25-10-2004 @ 01:45 AM by snoopy
Originally posted by vincere7
dh it will never be unsustainable. Funny how you forget WE WERE THE ONES ATTACKED!

We did not invade Iraq PRIOR to the attacks. Nor did we go into afghanistan PRIOR to the attacks. You forget we helped the cause of Islam against the russians and by supplying billions of dollars for your economies through purchased oil. This is our reward for aiding Islam that our own citizens be brutally killed.

Did we go forth and sack your cities and nations for your oil while OPEC manipulated our dollar and economy? We dealt with it UNTIL MUSLIMS ATTACKED US ON OUR SOIL.


Surely you are kidding right? 9/11 was hardly the beginning of anything. Do you think that Bin Laden set that up for fun? And are you kidding about Afghantistan? You do realize it is OUR fault that the place was in devistation and that the Taliban took over right? We used Afghan for our own greedy purposes and then left them for dead when the cold war ended. We used some innocent country as our battle ground against Russia. We didn't give a damn about those poor people and left many of them to die.

The whole cause of 9/11 was becuase we put soldiers on holy land which to them is a major major insult to their religion. We also support Israel who kils innocent people on a daily basis (BTW this is a good example of how pre-emptive attacks do not work).

Somehow it seems that Christians and Jews can kill, but if someone of another religion does it, it is immoral. People fight with what they can. If they don't have satelite GPS guided bombs that let them kill in a more civilized way from the comfort of a 1000 miles away, the will take hostages. If they didn't have bombs, they would use butter knives if they had to.

Every religion has its violent periods, this just seems like Islams turn, but it's not unlike all the other relgions which have already had their violent periods. Also, it's an easyvehicle for those seeking power to use in a land where there is little wealth.


reply posted on 25-10-2004 @ 03:46 AM by Life Is 4 Livin
Look many of you are decnt minded people who understand that some of Muslims are extreme and are very literal with their interpretations. Some of you, it seems, are very Islamaphobic and personally as a Muslim that is not great but that is becasue of your ignorance. Please let me address some of the issues here:

1) Jihad is only permissible hwne there is a tyrannical regime, when you are not allowed to worship Allah or in self defence
2) Many of you quote (spidergooch) the Muslim invasion of Spain etc however, some of you are so ignorant that you do not even know of the full conditiosn for I have read the generals books and I know what I am saying. They did not want to give in; if they did then nothing wouldhave happened -however, becasue they took to the sword thus there were 3 options open to them:
a) Refuse to fight
b) Giev a tax to the Muslims who will protect them and help them
c) Become Muslims

Some of you are ranting on about how violent Islam is hwen you know nothing about it. The reason Muslims were in Spain becasue Muslims there were being persectued.

bin Laden cannot justly declare a war becasue it isnt self defence, neither is there a tyrannical regime and neither is Islam being forbidden. Also, a special place in Paradise is only preserved when those conditions for Jihad are met. When Jihad is said people think holy war - absolutley wrong. It is a struggle against the Shaytaan (devil). Read this site before you say anything else:
alislam.org... and read the section on Jihad

Please reead all of tha carefully before you make any judgements. Also, congrast to Zero Deeo who actually understands something; you could learn form that vincere7

[edit on 25-10-2004 by Life Is 4 Livin]

[edit on 25-10-2004 by Life Is 4 Livin]


reply posted on 25-10-2004 @ 08:18 PM by craigandrew
All Murdering Terrorist F***ers are All Murdering Terrorist F***ers.....that is the ONLY generalisation that ANYONE should be making.

My mum was old Church of England, my dad Roman Catholic...both non practicing as a rule. I was baptised (or whatever you call it) CofE. I thought seeing dad was RC I must be RC......So I did two years of elective RC scripture classes in junior primary. When I told my dad he roared with laughter. God, he decided, had a sense of humor.

I by nature, became an agnostic (an aethist who hedges his bets by my own definition)

I see my self as christian by beleif, but not devout. I worked all my life in an insurance office, but it doesnt make me a capitalist. There are elements of both that go into my make up, but I'm not about going off on damn Crusades. I just want to get on with life

And I think the majority of westerners and so called christians see it pretty much the same. If we are motivated to fight we will, but please don't say it's because the bible tells me so.

So why is it when Muslims say they don't beleive in what terrorist arseholes like AQ and JI are doing, some other arsehole comes out and calls them a fraud or a liar?

Maybe its because the AH saying so is as fundamentalist and extremist as the AH in AQ swing the machet? Or just plain stupid.

Get it through your head. Most people of any supposed relgious sub group can be as devout or as secular as the next guy and not buy into this holy war crap, even if the biggest jerks on both sides of the pile want to paint it like that.

Maybe there are slightly more fanatic muslims out there than christians. Having the # bombed out of you on and off for the last twenty-thirty or more years can do that, even if a fanatic minority of your leadership deserve it.

If a Muslim came up to me and said "All I want to do is be left alone to raise my family and goats in peace" I would say "Amen Brother".

Take people as they come individually. If you don't, you would think all Americans were paranoid and all left wingers opposed to war based on one or two posts on this site.

The foolishness of some of the arguments appall me.


reply posted on 25-10-2004 @ 11:22 PM by spidergooch
So now because you claim to have read a book from the Muslim General who invaded Spain, I am ignorant of the History of the invasion of Spain?

You should do some more research, perhaps read from the conquered as opposed to the conquerer. Spain was a Christian nation at the time. It was populated and led from a line of Kings tracing their heritage back through the Vandals.

The Muslims landed, burned their boats, and with their Berber allies, began their conquest. That was the time the "evangelism began".

I am not pointing this out to justify anything anyone is doing. I am pointing out that Islam has a HISTORY of violence as do all other religions.

Did you really want to go into detail? India, the Near East, the Balkans, Constantinople, the kidnapping of Bulgar youths to form the Jannisary Corps. Perhaps if you read more than one point of view on the subject, we could discuss the actual history here.

I agree with Misfit. There were and are extremes on all sides. I simply cannot stand a one sided view of history. Do not tell me that by somehow giving the conquered 3 choices somehow makes the action of the agressor benign.

Conquering is conquering. The whole "they were persecuting Muslims" concept at that time period is perhaps only notated in the Jihad Generals writings. So many other writers of the time have such a totally different view. Much like, I imagine, the Iraqi people have a totally different view of the occupation than that of the occupiers.

The Spider
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 4 days ago with 10 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 8 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags