It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
For Australian journalist John Martinkus, seizing foreign nationals is an intelligent way of "fighting a war" when you are outnumbered and outgunned. And unlike Blair, Martinkus has first hand hostage experience.
Released unharmed over the weekend, SBS Television Dateline's Martinkus said his captors freed him after establishing his independence on Iraq coverage.
"These guys [are] not stupid. They're fighting a war but they're not savages. They're not actually just killing people willy-nilly. They talk to you, they think about things," he said at Melbourne airport on Tuesday.
"There was a reason to kill [British captive Kenneth] Bigley, there was a reason to kill the Americans; there was not a reason to kill me - luckily I managed to convince them of that," he said.
SBS executive producer Mike Carey said the journalist was freed after his captors used a popular internet search engine to establish he was an independent reporter who did not support the US presence in Iraq.
Various Iraqi groups have abducted more than 100 foreign nationals in a bid to destabilise Iraq's US-appointed interim government and force troops to leave.
And the kidnap of Care International's director is just the exception that proves a rule, says Egyptian politician Majdi Husain: 99% of those taken captive in Iraq are legitimate targets.
While the secretary-general of Egypt's Labour Party accepts Margaret Hassan and French journalists Georges Malbrunot and Christian Chesnot should be released at once - he says most other captives were collaborating with US forces and were fair game.
Husain also told Aljazeera on Sunday that the media should not describe the vast majority of foreigners detained by various Iraqi groups as hostages.
"They are not hostages but prisoners and according to Islamic law, they can be exchanged, set free or executed. All those who were killed were agents and partners of the occupation," he said.
Husain asks why some prominent Muslim voices suggest killing those who actively support the US war effort is wrong, especially when two thirds of those taken captive were later released in exchange for political or financial gains.
"The war effort is not restricted to those who just carry weapons. The war effort includes transport and supplies. Aren't supply lines part of military activity?"
"An Iraqi interpreter working for an American soldier - isn't that part of the war effort? Undoubtedly, all those killed were not civilians."
But it is not just Muslim clerics who discuss the ethics of taking captives. Bruce Blythe, head of Crisis Management International in Atlanta, says the practice is just "another way for have-nots to level the playing field ... another tool in their arsenal".
"These guys [are] not stupid. They're fighting a war but they're not savages. They're not actually just killing people willy-nilly. They talk to you, they think about things," he said at Melbourne airport on Tuesday.
"There was a reason to kill [British captive Kenneth] Bigley, there was a reason to kill the Americans; there was not a reason to kill me - luckily I managed to convince them of that," he said.
SBS executive producer Mike Carey said the journalist was freed after his captors used a popular internet search engine to establish he was an independent reporter who did not support the US presence in Iraq.
Originally posted by Amelia
any kind of violence is not right!!!!!!!!!!!!
Because of those muslims extremists, americans will think that everybody in middle-orient are savage and rude like them!!!!!!!
That is Sooooo not the case
Amelia
Because of those muslims extremists, americans will think that everybody in middle-orient are savage and rude like them!!!!!!!
Originally posted by snoopy
Pretty simple to me. It's war. We kill them, they kill us. Each side thinks the other is a monster for killing. They don't exacly have smart bombs and GPS, etc etc, what do we expect them to do? "Any means of fighting that you would consider civilized would mean we all get killed so you guys win"? Again, how do we expect them to fight? Put toether a nice big army and charge us so we only have to waste one bomb to kill em all?
If the US was invaded and our military was completely destroyed, would we not do the same thing? (taking out the factor that we thin we are right in being there, because the issue is that these people dont think we are. Them being wrong or right is not the issue). All is fair in war.
I know that most Muslims in the U.S. do not condone terrorism of any type but I wish that they would find a way to be more vocal and to be proactive in their attempts to put an end to terrorism.
Originally posted by verfed
I know that most Muslims in the U.S. do not condone terrorism of any type but I wish that they would find a way to be more vocal and to be proactive in their attempts to put an end to terrorism.
The muslims silence on terrorism and beheadings is deafening! Maybe a imam will say "cutting off innocent people's heads is bad for the wrong cause" but as a whole people that is over a billion strong where is the condemnation? Obviously most Muslims have a soft spot for the
insurgents. And many have more then a soft spot. Many Muslims are vocal I admit but they are vocal about killing Jews and beheading care workers.
Originally posted by devilwasp
hey just a thought i dunno if this would work but what if the coalition found the C+C of the extremist/terroorist groups and took the head member/family of and held them hostage for the freeing of any coalition troops/inocents being held hostage. i know its really under hand and dirty and sick but really would giveing the terrorists a taste of thier own medicine work?
Originally posted by zi2525
Put your self in this position, your country has just being invaded, you have gone through a night of bombing, you walk out side to see 3 of your neighbours and your sister (or other close realative) dead in peices in the street.
Originally posted by vincere7
Also z you being muslim must know according to the prophet you must throw out the infidel. You are called to fight and I am tired of muslims not admitting that they agree with killing Americans. Show a little back bone. You want to kill us not just because we invaded you but because we do not believe in mohammed. The quran calls for our deaths and the deaths of all unbelievers or for them to be driven from the lands you dwell.
Lets get real are you a bedouin? Will you dishonor your family by making cowardly conversation of persuasion? Just say it. You want us dead there is no shame in truth. The real truth is that there cannot exist a peace. The fairy tale land of peace on earth is just that a lie. As long as Islam exists we will fight you and you will fight us and we will not live together in harmony. So lets not lie to one another. Time is short you may die tomorrow.
Originally posted by craigandrew
My problem is once out of the country he has continued to repeat them, obviously in the hopes he can safely re-enter the country to resume being something other than another opinionated journalist.....now that is BS.
SBS should sack him or make him apologies to the executed.IMPO.
Originally posted by drbryankkruta
Give me a break dude just go with what you cant deny and if this is your
I dont agree with your beliefs but I would be more respectful of you for your convictions if you just outright told the truth and had a little pride in yourself ....and before everyone goes berzerk let me make it absolutely clear I DO NOT AGREE WITH THE POLICIES AND FUINDAMENTALS OF MUSLIM BELIEF but I respect the man who has pride in himself despite his misguided views or murder is good cause you dont believe what I believe, that just shows lack of freedom to choose to believe.....