Justification for Taking Hostages?, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times
Topic started on 22-10-2004 @ 01:41 PM by Creepy
saw this on Al-Jazeera.net today

The kidnapping of the director of Care International in Iraq has fuelled a debate over the legitimacy of taking hostages and killing captives

For Australian journalist John Martinkus, seizing foreign nationals is an intelligent way of "fighting a war" when you are outnumbered and outgunned. And unlike Blair, Martinkus has first hand hostage experience.

Released unharmed over the weekend, SBS Television Dateline's Martinkus said his captors freed him after establishing his independence on Iraq coverage.

"These guys [are] not stupid. They're fighting a war but they're not savages. They're not actually just killing people willy-nilly. They talk to you, they think about things," he said at Melbourne airport on Tuesday.

"There was a reason to kill [British captive Kenneth] Bigley, there was a reason to kill the Americans; there was not a reason to kill me - luckily I managed to convince them of that," he said.

SBS executive producer Mike Carey said the journalist was freed after his captors used a popular internet search engine to establish he was an independent reporter who did not support the US presence in Iraq.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Various Iraqi groups have abducted more than 100 foreign nationals in a bid to destabilise Iraq's US-appointed interim government and force troops to leave.

And the kidnap of Care International's director is just the exception that proves a rule, says Egyptian politician Majdi Husain: 99% of those taken captive in Iraq are legitimate targets.

While the secretary-general of Egypt's Labour Party accepts Margaret Hassan and French journalists Georges Malbrunot and Christian Chesnot should be released at once - he says most other captives were collaborating with US forces and were fair game.

Husain also told Aljazeera on Sunday that the media should not describe the vast majority of foreigners detained by various Iraqi groups as hostages.

"They are not hostages but prisoners and according to Islamic law, they can be exchanged, set free or executed. All those who were killed were agents and partners of the occupation," he said.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Husain asks why some prominent Muslim voices suggest killing those who actively support the US war effort is wrong, especially when two thirds of those taken captive were later released in exchange for political or financial gains.

"The war effort is not restricted to those who just carry weapons. The war effort includes transport and supplies. Aren't supply lines part of military activity?"

"An Iraqi interpreter working for an American soldier - isn't that part of the war effort? Undoubtedly, all those killed were not civilians."


But it is not just Muslim clerics who discuss the ethics of taking captives. Bruce Blythe, head of Crisis Management International in Atlanta, says the practice is just "another way for have-nots to level the playing field ... another tool in their arsenal".


the article goes on to mention examples of British and American war atrocities in the past...

so what do you guys think? is taking prisoners and beheading them on camera a legitimate tactic in this type of war?



[edit on 22-10-2004 by Creepy]


reply posted on 22-10-2004 @ 01:57 PM by drbryankkruta

"These guys [are] not stupid. They're fighting a war but they're not savages. They're not actually just killing people willy-nilly. They talk to you, they think about things," he said at Melbourne airport on Tuesday.

"There was a reason to kill [British captive Kenneth] Bigley, there was a reason to kill the Americans; there was not a reason to kill me - luckily I managed to convince them of that," he said.

SBS executive producer Mike Carey said the journalist was freed after his captors used a popular internet search engine to establish he was an independent reporter who did not support the US presence in Iraq.





THIS IS THE SICKEST thing I have ever heard this man should be ashamed and fired as a journalist so he cant spread these and other disgusting thoughts and tactics.

Anyone that would negotiate for his life by justifying to the killers that it was okay to take a human life cause the person came from a specific background and you didnt is nothing more than saving your own arse thru the misfortunes of another...

There is no justification for this method if I were a killer and someone did this with me I would kill him out of pure discust with his cowardess and monopolization of the facts to talk his way out of dying...

If anything these stupid terrorists do admire courage and in that they should have been more convienced of the corrupt and arse shaving self rightous indignants who cant even take their death with some sort of human descency......

GOD THIS MAKES ME SICK



reply posted on 23-10-2004 @ 12:51 AM by zi2525
As a muslim i have being asked why i dont speak out about the beheading in iraq, the reason for this, is becouse is see it as getting what you get for going to war. You can say its not fair ect. But how many of YOU personally know the emotional feeling of living in a city that is being bombed all night? How many of YOU know whats its like to have your door broken down and yelled out to get out side and on the ground by a bunch of soldiers? How many of YOU personally know what it is like to lose a loved on, an innocent, daughter, sister, brother, from and explosion which is just on of the "off" ones, knowing that the soldiers that fired that missle are more than likely sitting around saying "damn that was alot of money we just lost". You cant say that what they are doing is unfair, you know whats unfair, being 3000 miles in the air looking out of a camera like some kind of chicken to scared to look his enemy in the eye, thats unfair. And about civilian Americans,French,British ect, Being beheaded there, You are in their country in a time when your soldier are killing them, should they really be that great full?

Put your self in this position, your country has just being invaded, you have gone through a night of bombing, you walk out side to see 3 of your neighbours and your sister (or other close realative) dead in peices in the street. You move on to see more of the your freinds and town destroyed, you go back in to your house and turn on the news, you and the rest of your family is sitting there when the door gets kicked in, 6 men with rifles scream at you to get out side and on the ground for no reason. The ridicule your accent, make you say things in their language and laugh at you, and make you look like a fool in front of every one. They then set up check points (like in isreal) and make you family sit in the rain for 10 hours to get back to your home. When you get home some one in your family is sick, you go out of town to get medicine, on your way back they dont let you in, they make you sleep in the street all night and let you in the morning (they leave you out there for no reason, they just decided the check point is closed). You get home the person is even more sick. You find out that the ocupying forces are making fun or you belifes and values, making degrading pictures of you people, and some calling it a war on your religon. Now you tell me, what are you gonna do? Make some pizza and just say it will blow over? Or are you gonna fight? (most people here will lie just so i cant make my point, but seriously think about this, i dont think one person here could describe the amount of emotion and fear that this wold cause). So seriously think about it.


reply posted on 23-10-2004 @ 01:26 AM by drbryankkruta
Originally posted by devilwasp
hey just a thought i dunno if this would work but what if the coalition found the C+C of the extremist/terroorist groups and took the head member/family of and held them hostage for the freeing of any coalition troops/inocents being held hostage. i know its really under hand and dirty and sick but really would giveing the terrorists a taste of thier own medicine work?



Interesting, but the only in error in this thought is well 2 things.

Death for a cause is admired throug martyrism which is key to this organization due to their excessive use of suicide attacks wether they be out right bombings or taking hostages and killing them and yourself after stating your views.

Second the basic principle of this organization places the art of splintered cell command into its highest state of realization...by this I mean one regiment of say 30 men per platoon and 15 men per squad with six men and 1 leader in each tactical group could translate into at least 2-300 leaders both in primary and secondary command... and even worst all these tactical groups or splinter cells have the option to go out with out approval and contact with higher ups to take out targets of oppurtunity....

So we wouldn't do anything by taking out a few leaders but further fuel the tactics of those we are trying to stop ....you can kill a snake by chopping off its head but you cant chop the heads of a swarm of ants some will always escape


reply posted on 23-10-2004 @ 01:55 AM by vincere7
Originally posted by zi2525
Put your self in this position, your country has just being invaded, you have gone through a night of bombing, you walk out side to see 3 of your neighbours and your sister (or other close realative) dead in peices in the street.


Black, red, yellow, white, I don't care what color you are or what culture you come from if you experience this you will fight.

Also z you being muslim must know according to the prophet you must throw out the infidel. You are called to fight and I am tired of muslims not admitting that they agree with killing Americans. Show a little back bone. You want to kill us not just because we invaded you but because we do not believe in mohammed. The quran calls for our deaths and the deaths of all unbelievers or for them to be driven from the lands you dwell.

Lets get real are you a bedouin? Will you dishonor your family by making cowardly conversation of persuasion? Just say it. You want us dead there is no shame in truth. The real truth is that there cannot exist a peace. The fairy tale land of peace on earth is just that a lie. As long as Islam exists we will fight you and you will fight us and we will not live together in harmony. So lets not lie to one another. Time is short you may die tomorrow.

There are a billion of you and 600 million of us including europe. If I see things correctly many power people want to adjust those odds. How can we really trust any muslims ever? Because you say you are good and want peace? Your very youth believes and praises those who kill by suicide. Will you deny this and say, 'oh they don't believe in the true Islam they are extreme.' Your children can only follow what they are taught. Your prophet does not teach a peace for unbelievers.

As the population grows so will the escalation of war. Welcome to the new millenium - the war of attrition. You must realize that we have to take all your countries it's the only way we can win.


reply posted on 23-10-2004 @ 02:12 AM by drbryankkruta
Originally posted by vincere7
Also z you being muslim must know according to the prophet you must throw out the infidel. You are called to fight and I am tired of muslims not admitting that they agree with killing Americans. Show a little back bone. You want to kill us not just because we invaded you but because we do not believe in mohammed. The quran calls for our deaths and the deaths of all unbelievers or for them to be driven from the lands you dwell.

Lets get real are you a bedouin? Will you dishonor your family by making cowardly conversation of persuasion? Just say it. You want us dead there is no shame in truth. The real truth is that there cannot exist a peace. The fairy tale land of peace on earth is just that a lie. As long as Islam exists we will fight you and you will fight us and we will not live together in harmony. So lets not lie to one another. Time is short you may die tomorrow.



This is so true the first sign of hypocracy is the following two things,

1 denial -the out right avoidance of the truth to avoid harsh public opinion

2 misdirection- realizing someone knows the truth and has that harsh opinion of you and you try to lay the blame off on radicals....

Give me a break dude just go with what you cant deny and if this is your faith and you claim to be righteous in the relms of your religious beleifs...you show be honest to your convictions ....because right now I would say people who deny their religion in the face of harsh world opinion are in their own right infidels to their faith thru deniability.

I dont agree with your beliefs but I would be more respectful of you for your convictions if you just outright told the truth and had a little pride in yourself ....and before everyone goes berzerk let me make it absolutely clear I DO NOT AGREE WITH THE POLICIES AND FUINDAMENTALS OF MUSLIM BELIEF but I respect the man who has pride in himself despite his misguided views or murder is good cause you dont believe what I believe, that just shows lack of freedom to choose to believe.....

Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 4 days ago with 10 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 8 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags