It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
the only businesses i've ever come across that don't have close ties to government are usually illegal ones.
I mean businesses with close ties to government and those without it
this sounds like you are against sacrifice ?
My point is that we are forced to look out for our well being instinctively and this eliminates any real choice
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by daskakik
any chance you could be more specific with this comment ?
the only businesses i've ever come across that don't have close ties to government are usually illegal ones.
I mean businesses with close ties to government and those without it
by industry, i cannot think of one.
healthcare, R&D, oil/gas, service, transportation/logistics, legal, construction or demolition ... i know i'm missing quite a few but i cannot think of one that isn't exploiting their "close ties to government", can you ?
this sounds like you are against sacrifice ?
surely that isn't what you meant
and this is where we disagree, living/surviving is instinct, dying isn't even a choice of our making any more ... plenty of ppl are denied their choice to be relieved of their ongoing suffering.
All I'm saying is that by instinct we are forced to survive and therefore it isn't a choice.
sure it is, i see it on corners daily around here, don't you ?
We may choose how we survive but sitting in one spot and starving isn't really an option.
fair enough but you still haven't explained how labors of love (surviving) are equal to labors of an IOU (paycheck).
Everything else is work. What I posted has nothing to do with what or how much sacrifice someone puts into their endeavors.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by daskakik
mom/pop businesses is far tooooo general an answer.
plenty of them are members of PACs, plenty of them contribute politcally (tax write-off and all), and plenty of them have family members who are also government employees.
so, how/why do they get a pass when they have their fingers in the same pie ?
and this is where we disagree, living/surviving is instinct, dying isn't even a choice of our making any more ... plenty of ppl are denied their choice to be relieved of their ongoing suffering.
what that is ... is a classic example of over-regulation.
fair enough but you still haven't explained how labors of love (surviving) are equal to labors of an IOU (paycheck).
that is the point, afterall.
i always get a kick out of ppl who belittle service industry workers.
the general consensus is that those employees are either too stupid or too lazy to get a better job. what is hilarious is that many of those ppl CHOOSE to be of service to their neighbors ... what is so bad about that ? (aside from the paltry paycheck)
in my family (many generations ago), so many of us were in servitude of one form or another, that it is actually depicted on the family crest.
since it was very intertwined in the book, perhaps it should be.
Might be your point but not mine
Originally posted by Honor93
actually it is.
doesn't matter if it's on a corporate level or an individual one.
however, without competition, we have -0- progress.
competition is the spark that ignites innovation.
the desire to make an existing thing, better, is still competition.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by daskakik
contribution size ?
are you indicating that those who contribute more or less should get a pass ?
and honestly, isn't that less than fair anyway ?
my point was, they all have their fingers/some a whole hand inside the same cookie jar ... why should contributions determine who gets a cookie ?
same choice, i've made it many times in my life.
surviving is also a choice ... as it should be.
mothers work every day of their lives and do so without a paycheck ... are you inferring they don't?
considering paid vs non-paid work, it's all the same ... it's work.
so, why should some be overly compensated while others are not compensated at all ?
since it was very intertwined in the book, perhaps it should be.
in this country, that only works if a patent isn't standing in their way.
These same two indivduals, both having a genuine desire to make something better, would do so faster and more exactly by working together for the betterment of the market they are trying to help through inovation
yeah, i'm sure the vikings and gladiators would agree
Not in mankind. It is required in the governmental systems mankind created apart from God, not the actual truth of life
BS and i think you're either confused or brain-washed.
In reality the desire to help others through cooperation has far greater effect on the wolrd as a whole then competition can ever create.
i'm going with brain-washed
Competition = my way is best
Cooperation = something needs to get better, let's work together and find the best way
only by those who choose to be players in said game. i'm not one of them.
Because that is how the game is played
doing nothing is ALWAYS a choice. one of which plenty of ppl seem to embrace.
I'm the one that said that everything that people do is work and that the survival instinct drives us to do something so that doing nothing is not really a choice. I don't understand why you seem to keep adding things to what I post
Originally posted by Honor93
you've never studied much about the Stalin regime, have you ?
if you had, you wouldn't be asking such silly questions.
how many "producers" exist in your neighborhood, today ??
[we still have quite a few here but yes, several have closed and gone elsewhere]
in this region, cigar manufacturers come to mind, immediately.
besides, under Obamacare, this is a moot topic ... as there is no "opt-out" option.
if i don't understand Ayn, what makes you think YOU do ?
i could be wrong here but i think i've been reading her material alot longer than you have.
[speaking of which, did you even READ the book or just watch a movie and claim to know all ?]
soooo, because you watched ONE movie, you're suddenly an expert on all things Rand ??
Rand would say everyone is an individual motivation by selfish desires. I am not sure why I am even
bothering to talk with you, you are clueless on your Ayn Rand, absolutely lost in the bushes
foundation, foundation, foundation ... hers and the storyline's.
What is the point of that comment?
without specifics, you're feeding us BS.
Not sure of the point here either?
Pretty much the same producers that have been about since before I was born, plus the new ones.
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by Honor93
Well you seem to have missed the point I tried to make.
I am not deflecting, I'm refusing to address things you are bringing up because they were not part of my initial point. They are things that you inferred which I had made no comment about.
Honestly I don't know why you do that. Like the statement about service sector workers and mothers not working. I have no idea where you came up with those. How do you expect me to answer to those types of things when I never mentioned them?
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by Thepump
foundation, foundation, foundation ... hers and the storyline's.
What is the point of that comment?
so, you're not sure of the point, yet you lie anyways ?
why ?
no, i addressed your points, all of them, however, you are avoiding participating in the basic concept of a conversation. claiming my points are invalid does not invalidate them.
Originally posted by daskakik
reply to post by Honor93
Well you seem to have missed the point I tried to make.
I am not deflecting, I'm refusing to address things you are bringing up because they were not part of my initial point. They are things that you inferred which I had made no comment about.
Honestly I don't know why you do that. Like the statement about service sector workers and mothers not working. I have no idea where you came up with those. How do you expect me to answer to those types of things when I never mentioned them?