reply to post by kaptabs
I interpreted the 'resize' to be that the photo of the officer was taken in one setting and then made to 'fit' the picture. There is no shoebox
The shoe display looks 'out of place' like it too was taken from somewhere else and is not the same lighting level.
Taken by itself, it might not be enough, but in hearing this woman on the phone to Hannity was what first made
me highly suspicious.
That she saw the same homeless guy hours earlier. That she claims the officer talked to the man and got his shoe size then went right into the store
where he was given a 25% off discount.
That the man did not have frostbite when the weather has been freezing most every night.
I could not imagine the "blisters" on his feet. Blisters would be from heat or friction.
Just everything the woman says sounded like a lie.
How did Hannity have her phone number?
Did she call him first to crow about her photo?
Why did she only take a photo of the cop there leaving boots?
Why wouldn't she have taken one with the guy wearing them after he put them on?
I mean I would if I was just capturing this vignette with my cop bf at my side and the police
officer just so totally unaware that someone is taking his pic.
For all I know, the way she kept saying the officers name, how did she know it??
She took a photo of her bf and he was the resize to fit a pic she had found earlier.
Sometimes these photos are not always the media behind them.
Almost every organization has a PR firm these days and they are the ones who come up
with this stuff.
Glad you found the fotoforensics helpful.
The more you use it the more you can get a feel for real vs "not exactly".