It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MagicWand67
reply to post by Uncinus
Size and distribution of the CCN produces different results.
The amount of carbon output in the contrail mitigation system is more than double the amount from the proposed technique I posted earlier.
It's a completely different technique. Like trying to compare apples and oranges.
The link I provided clearly states that MORE cirrus clouds would be the likely result.
Originally posted by waynos
reply to post by phroziac
I wouldnt worry too much about oil poisoning from overflying B-17's
Originally posted by Uncinus
reply to post by phroziac
When a plane is in the air the (100 mph+) airstream will atomize the oil, so it's not going to drip on anything. It's vaporized and entrained in the air as an aerosol, so just joins up with the existing pollution. It's a pretty small overall contribution.
Originally posted by phroziac
Originally posted by Uncinus
reply to post by phroziac
When a plane is in the air the (100 mph+) airstream will atomize the oil, so it's not going to drip on anything. It's vaporized and entrained in the air as an aerosol, so just joins up with the existing pollution. It's a pretty small overall contribution.
so it makes a chemtrail
Am I going to walk outside and have a B-17 fly over my house and drip oil on my clothes and ruin my clothes? Oh, and I actually had a B-17 fly over my house once. I was like, WTF and drove down to the airport and found it on the ramp and went in it and took pictures
Originally posted by Rudy2shoes
Can you show us the facts of per vehicle,
how many gallons consumed.
I have been unable to find any train or car that consumes as much fuel as one airplane.
Originally posted by waynos
reply to post by phroziac
I wouldnt worry too much about oil poisoning from overflying B-17's
Chemtrails may exist, or they may not. No scientific data exists to offer proof one way, or the other
Originally posted by waynos
reply to post by MountainLaurel
Your post bears a similarity to my own OP in this thread here, even down to watching the dog outside, lol. As you see I did a bit of checking at the time, have you any thoughts regarding this?
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
If you haven't seen this documentary I hope you will take the time to watch it, then perhaps we can discuss further....the reaction of OUR government at the end was VERY disturbing......
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
I didn't percieve his statements to contradict the documentary at all...he says under "unusual" circumstances contrails can persist...no one disputes that fact.
Still would not explain what I'm seeing in CA, with warm weather and generally low humidaty here.
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
Still would not explain what I'm seeing in CA, with warm weather and generally low humidaty here.