posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 08:23 PM
Originally posted by geldib
The end result is the same but the means of getting there are different. People think that the castle doctrine law is a license to kill if someone
crosses that line, but its not. Castle Doctrine is to neutralize the threat to you and your families safety. If you shoot someone 3 times and they die
because of a head, heart, or artery shot thats one thing. Continuously pumping bullets in someone that is on the ground neutralized is murder plain
and simple. Not to mention all the other questionable things like moving a body and in effect setting a trap for the young woman.
29-11-2012 by geldib because: (no reason given)
Your statements from a legal perpective are correct sir, your personal opinions...understood.
I suppose the headlines should have read " Blossoming home invader's career cut short, murdered by elderly home owner." At least the PC following
would be placated.
Hypo scenario,..: if these two broke into your home, raped your wife, and after doing so proceeded to clean out your safe. During which, she scores a
gun and smokes the two intruders, who fall down and are gurgling...she 'finishes them off' as they lay there.
Murder? Heat of passion? Would you so profoundly recite improper protocol? Think.
There are exceptions that fly. A man's castle, and the safety of his family, ..IS his passion. He felt raped...think about it. ***His mistake was what
he said to police, and how he said it, without an attorney.***
Ps: I have a total cure for your condition... Phillips probiotics, one a day. Trust me you will thank me later.
edit on 29-11-2012 by
Lonewulph because: (no reason given)