ok first of all pattern recognition skills are awesome, but not in that case XD
this site brings up the worst and most radical things there are out there, so anyone that relies almost purely on this site for his pattern
recognition usage is doomed to miss the bigger picture and come to a mistaken conclusion.
second, about the shelters thing, uhmm what did you expect? of course countries will build massive underground shelters, and of course many will
remain a secret. every country is doing it, because it's an inevitability in any kind of war. you as a country don't want to wait until you are sure
there is a war coming and then start building these, you must be prepared before. if countries didn't do it, it would be surprising. you can't just
ignore all of human history and say "oh well there won't be any more wars, I'm sure our friends will love to use diplomacy
thirdly china is building those for one main reason only: it wants to be involved in( a.k.a. rule) Africaת due to Africa's enormous resources and
to be able to counter "dangerous" western effect . I really don't think that there is any use for a satellite state in order for china to rule
fourthly, many presentations are showing dramatic footage that has little to do with their presentation, usually to make people sympathize more, but
will make clear of this to the people. Al Gore pathetic usage of footage can only plead on himself and not on others that agree with his ideals.
correct me if I misinterpreted you, but you seemed to suggest that because of this, Al Gore ideals are incorrect. this is something you just can't
do. if it were only him, then it will be acceptable, but considering the enormous amount of date that rolls for global warming favor, you simply be
mistaken to do so.
secondly the theory that the sudden global warming is caused by the sun rather than by human pollution, was debated and was found to be mistaken(
simply because human pollution is an indisputable fact, when on the other hand, the sun is showing to be coiling rather than warming in recent years).
because of that it's of negligible importance to include the sun in any global warming article.
I really haven't heard until now about the social engineering thing so I can't really replay to that. however I really doubt that this is true, I am
a skeptic so I doubt everything XD , but still it doesn't make any sense to me. I will read and replay to that later.
fifthly( well five and a half because of all that social engineering thing, but bare with me
) I really agree. that data should be accessible
through the internet, I guess it's either on some site no one enters or that simply those who are doing something about it have better resources. I
did find this site that provides a lot of data, but I still think this is not enough.
I'm tired of using "ly" so I'll by using numbers from now on
6) the internet is dommed to be comprised of conflicting data. it's (still) not a network of precise information, it's a network of networks of
humans ideas. the wise will look at the resource, the way the research was taken, the amount of conflicting data, and from that will conclude whether
or not the idea you are being exposed to is correct. there are plenty of resources that you can count on, but coming from a skeptic, it's always
better to see what is the counter argument and then made up your mind.
so basically your conclusion ignores all the other counter and reasonable arguments and assumes that your skills can apply to this kind of things. it
would be easier to recognize a pattern in prime numbers.