It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You're right, jail isn't the answer. One hellacious ass kicking from that little girl's dad, now that's the answer.
Originally posted by hououinkyouma
reply to post by snarky412
Terrible behavior, but I don`t think jail is the answer. I don`t think it`s in the law either.
Originally posted by sylent6
Well all his information is out there. I guess he will be sleeping with his eyes wide open.
Originally posted by FraternitasSaturni
not that I'm defending the guy but jail? what a stupid world we live in...
least all the real criminals laugh while we put each other behind bars for the slightest thing.
So... whats next? Swearing in public like in the Demolition Man?
Damn if we applaud these actions we sure deserve the way the world is turning into a police state everywhere.
Next: Midget jokes! life sentence. Death if includes horses (or sarah jessica parker) < damn... I bet that just went on record.
Anyway... jailing a guy acting like a retard and you guys agreeing to it... its just dangerous.
Originally posted by hououinkyouma
I don`t think it`s in the law either.
2903.21 Aggravated menacing.
(A) No person shall knowingly cause another to believe that the offender will cause serious physical harm to the person or property of the other person, the other person’s unborn, or a member of the other person’s immediate family.
(B) No person shall do any of the following to a child under eighteen years of age or a mentally or physically handicapped child under twenty-one years of age:
(1) Abuse the child;
(2) Torture or cruelly abuse the child;
...
§ 2901.01 Definitions.
(A) As used in the Revised Code:
(5) "Serious physical harm to persons" means any of the following:
(a) Any mental illness or condition of such gravity as would normally require hospitalization or prolonged psychiatric treatment;
Originally posted by LightWarrior11
They could've charged him with harassment, especially if they confirm it's an ongoing thing...
Just a thought.
Originally posted by Maslo
Originally posted by LightWarrior11
They could've charged him with harassment, especially if they confirm it's an ongoing thing...
Just a thought.
This. I think you should be able to make fun of everything and everyone, even if it is hurtful. Thats just free speech, and a little trauma helps people not to grow up into pussies. However, when it is ongoing, then the danger to ones psychique gets exponentionaly worse, and thats what a charge of harrassment is for.
Originally posted by Shaxuul
Originally posted by Maslo
Originally posted by LightWarrior11
They could've charged him with harassment, especially if they confirm it's an ongoing thing...
Just a thought.
This. I think you should be able to make fun of everything and everyone, even if it is hurtful. Thats just free speech, and a little trauma helps people not to grow up into pussies. However, when it is ongoing, then the danger to ones psychique gets exponentionaly worse, and thats what a charge of harrassment is for.
Oh I know d00d, a 43-year-old man should definitely BULLY and make fun of a 10-year-old child with cerebral palsy, so she doesn't "grow up to be a whiny little pussy-wimp." For sure, d00d1111!!!!
Idiot.
Originally posted by defcon5
Originally posted by hououinkyouma
I don`t think it`s in the law either.
2903.21 Aggravated menacing.
(A) No person shall knowingly cause another to believe that the offender will cause serious physical harm to the person or property of the other person, the other person’s unborn, or a member of the other person’s immediate family.
I believe that in most states this would fall under "stalking"...
It appears to be similar in fashion to "brandishing" where the crime is due to the perception of the victim that they are being targeted, and in danger of coming to harm. Obviously if she was so afraid that she didn't want to ride the bus anymore, then it has gotten to the point of the child being legitimately in fear for her safety.
As he plead 'no contest' they obviously had made a deal with him, and he was facing even more serious charges then he was convicted of. He was most likely looking at being charged with “Child abuse” and “endangerment” which would be enhanced further as she is also a handicapped minor:
(B) No person shall do any of the following to a child under eighteen years of age or a mentally or physically handicapped child under twenty-one years of age:
(1) Abuse the child;
(2) Torture or cruelly abuse the child;
...
§ 2901.01 Definitions.
(A) As used in the Revised Code:
(5) "Serious physical harm to persons" means any of the following:
(a) Any mental illness or condition of such gravity as would normally require hospitalization or prolonged psychiatric treatment;
He was possibly looking at some serious time for his little stunt.
The family should now also pursue all civil legal actions they can take on her behalf as well.