Two arrested after throwing custard pies at Ann Coulter

Originally posted by keholmes
billy,

And so if you know that the �evidence� is manufactured doesn�t that tell you something?

it is not manufactured. it is piecemeal. big difference.

Originally posted by keholmesNice theory, four huh�.but were does the center fit in?

centers don't exist. vector 0/0/0/0. it is not my theory. it is marshall mcluhan's.

Originally posted by keholmesWow, more than bush and kerry, you�ve open my eyes congrats. so tell me more, who might this badnarik fellow be? Does he represent an actual party, is he running?

yes he is running. you can read the interview with him right here on ATS. he is libertarian. left/right. democrat is right/left. republican is right/right and communist is left/left. notice you get to choose from right or right, from a dualistic, bipartisan standpoint?

Originally posted by keholmesand where might I find some information out about this other party.

exactly.

Originally posted by billybob

Originally posted by keholmes
billy,

And so if you know that the �evidence� is manufactured doesn�t that tell you something?

it is not manufactured. it is piecemeal. big difference.

if you cut up a speech change the order to alter it�s intent�.where in the world do you get piecemeal from.

Straight from the DNC

See the difference between George Bush's four years of wrong choices and John Kerry's plan for a stronger America and help us spread the word.

DNC outlines Skerry�s plan.
See the four years of wrong choices, john kerry�s plan for america; spread the word.

get it yet?


[edit on 24-10-2004 by keholmes]

Originally posted by keholmes
if you cut up a speech change the order to alter it�s intent�.where in the world do you get piecemeal from.

it is cut up and spread around. piecemeal. the content hasn't altered, only the spin. everybody's doing it. a bigger, better example is the cascade of excuses for sending the youth of the country to die in a desert on the otherside of the world. weapons of mass deception is not the sole proprietorship of moore. another bigger better example is how bush plunged into war with afghanistan because a saudi, ALLEGEDLY attacked the country, when in fact the plans for INVASION were on the table months before. the CIA put the taliban in place to have control over poppies(because the CIA gets black budget funding by running the drug trade in USA. ask noriega). the taliban decided, mmmm, drugs'r'bad, mmmmm'kay, and incurred the wrath of the shadowrulers(this is of course, just another layer of smoke to be cleared in the search for truth) the plans to run a pipeline through afghanistan were the other reason for invading. shortly after declaring,'we will not deal with terroists', post nineoneone, a contingent of taliban were in the offices of unocal in texas, negotiating.
it's all a play, man, the wars, the election, even the pieings are probably being staged. you are an android.

Originally posted by keholmes
DNC outlines Skerry�s plan.
See the four years of wrong choices, john kerry�s plan for america; spread the word.

get it yet?
[edit on 24-10-2004 by keholmes]

there are no sides. get it, yet?

I heard the pie-throwing idiots actually got paid to do it. Just like they will most likely be paid to vote. BTW they missed, I hope whoever paid them, didn't pay them as much.

Where are the pie-throwing Republicans? Oh, wait Republicans have more class than that.

Originally posted by Carseller4
I heard the pie-throwing idiots actually got paid to do it. Just like they will most likely be paid to vote. BTW they missed, I hope whoever paid them, didn't pay them as much.

Where are the pie-throwing Republicans? Oh, wait Republicans have more class than that.

paid by whom? neocons, the new nazi. sarcasm doesn't register online, so i'm wondering if you were being literal or sarcastic when you say republicans have more class than that.
to me, 'more class'='paying some have-not to do your dirty work'. whether it's a pieing or a 'terrorist attack', it has been engineered to steer the masses of sheeple.
it's all triggers and programs.
incredulity will not let this truth be known. it is self immolating knowledge. however, this is becoming less true, due to the advent of light speed mass consciousness via the internet. they are writing new programs now to counter the effect of this retrieved human freedom.

Im thinking of joining the NPA

"I will give up my pies when they pry them from my cold, dead hands."

Originally posted by astrocreep
..and just let someone hit Micheal Moore with a pie (assuming it makes it to impact) and I'd bet you all would be calling for criminal charges. Look, striking someone is assault. Bottom Line.

I don't know what to say but...BRAVO!! If Micheal Moore got pied, the Libs would have called it "attempted political assassination". I say SCREW THEM! They break into and trash Republican Party offices, physically attack our representatives, and slander us in EVERY SINGLE METHOD POSSIBLE, INCLUDING FILMS AND TEXT.

Well hey Libs, check this!
WWI...Woodrow Wilson...DEMOCRAT...63,000+DEAD.
WWII...Franklin Roosevlet...DEMOCRAT...404,000+DEAD.
Korea...Harry Truman...DEMOCRAT...54,000+DEAD.

By the way, I'm being kind...I didn't include Vietnam.

Oh, and before you Libs throw "Hey, The Civil War...Lincoln...REPUBLICAN" at me, keep in mine...Jefferson Davis was a also a DEMOCRAT.

Originally posted by build319
I think we should let Ann Coulter and Michael Moore battle it out in the ring. Then shoot the winner.

Seriously, both these propagandists have ego's bigger than their wallets (or Moore's belly) and spit nothing but lies and misdirections. They have no respect for other people, no class and no tact. They should be exterminated like the insects that they are.

Just like Bush. Execution.

Originally posted by Toelint
I say SCREW THEM! They break into and trash Republican Party offices, physically attack our representatives, and slander us in EVERY SINGLE METHOD POSSIBLE, INCLUDING FILMS AND TEXT.

Well hey Libs, check this!
WWI...Woodrow Wilson...DEMOCRAT...63,000+DEAD.
WWII...Franklin Roosevlet...DEMOCRAT...404,000+DEAD.
Korea...Harry Truman...DEMOCRAT...54,000+DEAD.

Oh no! The Libs are slandering you in EVERY SINGLE METHOD POSSIBLE, INCLUDING FILMS AND TEXT! Even smoke signals and carrier pigeons are out to get you! As for trashing Republican offices, they really weren't all that nice in the first place. Nazi flags typically clash with most color schemes.

But, since you put it like that, I'd like thank the Republicans for absolutely nothing, except sitting on their lazy as*es, while we did all the hard work fighting the Nazis and the Communists. I'm sure invading Iraq, TWICE, and fighting those awfully imposing band of Iraqi super soldiers has more than made up for your lack of imput regarding world affairs in the last 50 years.

I'm sure Ann Coulter, when she's not eating pie, can talk with you some more about the unfair treatment of Joe McCarthy.

billybob

As I originally said you should stop perpetuating the stereotypes....I hate to burst your bubble but we have invasion plans for most countries that are suspect. It�s called being prepared. And if not being stupid enough to say �I realized the evidence is manufactured, but it sure is damning� makes me an android then so be it.


[edit on 24-10-2004 by keholmes]

Originally posted by keholmes
billybob

As I originally said you should stop perpetuating the stereotypes....I hate to burst your bubble but we have invasion plans for most countries that are suspect. It�s called being prepared. And if not being stupid enough to say �I realized the evidence is manufactured, but it sure is damning� makes me an android then so be it.


[edit on 24-10-2004 by keholmes]

it's called being agressive imperialists when you invade other countries. defense doesn't require bombing schools, and hospitals, and propping up greedy little despots throughout the third world.
the evidence is not manufactured. have you ever seen a courtroom scene? evidence is not the whole story. it is just a piece which can be fit together with other pieces. evidence is not proof. it is just evidence. however, the more evidence you have, the closer you are to proof. of course only absolute proof is proof, but there is no such thing as absolute proof, as all proofs are based on previous assumptions, the biggest one being that anything actually exists. as they say, if you put a brain in a jar and hooked it up to a computer that simulated the senses, the brain would not know it is floating in a jar.
so, all that said, this isn't about anne and mike. it's about you and i. you represent the mainstream pablum(which you seem to believe is not manufactured, watch the documentaary, 'manufacturing consent' by noam chomsky), and i represent independent research. i believe that independents are more reliable, because they aren't doing it for money. they're doing it to restore the rights of the individual in our big brother society. also, because, if you know anything about the world of media, you will know that it is a top down structure. the days of real reporters are long gone, and instead, we now have entertainment coordinators concerned only with ratings, and not relevent, balanced reporting. independents are a retrieval of real reporting. they follow their nose and gut instinct, and not a corporate script. they are reporting for the purpose of uncovering corruption, not covering it up like the mainstream.(hey, that's funny! the 'press'(ure you into thinking what they want you to think) and they 'cover'(up) the story),
you turn on a tv, or open a paper and believe that what you're seeing is truth. media is all theatre now. the 'free press' is not concerned with being the moderator between we the people and the government, anymore. the only thing that matters to anyone is money, and the almighty buck has people literally sending their children to die trying to murder foreign children in a foreign land, just for the god given 'right' to drive an SUV that gets 12 miles to the gallon,all the while waving a flag that represents freedom and justice, while renouncing all freedom, the constitution, and the onus of proof of guilt.
bin laden is innocent(suspect) as he was never, PROVEN guilty in a court of law. a country should follow it's own laws. there is nothing more sacred than principals. terrorism is a crime, not an act of war. saddam was no threat. androids don't see all the non sequitors, or realise the slippery slope of compromising principal for a quick fix.

the thing about michael moore's evidence, is that it is real evidence. he didn't dub any fake words into anybody's mouth. there is no CGI effects crew designing fake personalities. it is evidence and it is not manufactured. it is up to all the sherlocks and judge judy's out there to decide for themselves how the dots connect.

for real manufactured evidence, watch nick berg not bleed like a high pressure hose as the white people psy-ops guys cut his already dead head off. or just watch CNN.

or watch anne coulter get pied.

p.s. i truly don't think i'm a stereotypical billybob. i picked that name as bias-bait, and you've bitten twice in a row. i'm actually a jewish black woman.
the fish can't discover that they live in the water.

billybob

At least in person you don't perpetuate the stereotype, well until you speak that is....I think�..I�ll have to get back to you on that one. so you picked a name thinking that with your views people might think you hickish??? is that what you were after?? if so at least you realize it.

I was really beginning to get concerned that maybe I was missing something, until you whipped out the line about the libertarian socialist, nuf said.... About the only thing I�d like to hear from him is his own internal arguments with himself. although I�ve got to say at first I couldn't understand how manufactured evidence is damning...now I do, at least for you.

just a quick guess....are you an attorney....if so did you prosecute those people in california that ran the day-care?


and as to M. Moore he reordered words to change the intent....you can spin it any way you want...but he made the speech say what he wanted not the speaker, and that is b___ s___



[edit on 25-10-2004 by keholmes]

Originally posted by brimstone735

Originally posted by Toelint
I say SCREW THEM! They break into and trash Republican Party offices, physically attack our representatives, and slander us in EVERY SINGLE METHOD POSSIBLE, INCLUDING FILMS AND TEXT.

Well hey Libs, check this!
WWI...Woodrow Wilson...DEMOCRAT...63,000+DEAD.
WWII...Franklin Roosevlet...DEMOCRAT...404,000+DEAD.
Korea...Harry Truman...DEMOCRAT...54,000+DEAD.

Oh no! The Libs are slandering you in EVERY SINGLE METHOD POSSIBLE, INCLUDING FILMS AND TEXT! Even smoke signals and carrier pigeons are out to get you! As for trashing Republican offices, they really weren't all that nice in the first place. Nazi flags typically clash with most color schemes.

But, since you put it like that, I'd like thank the Republicans for absolutely nothing, except sitting on their lazy as*es, while we did all the hard work fighting the Nazis and the Communists. I'm sure invading Iraq, TWICE, and fighting those awfully imposing band of Iraqi super soldiers has more than made up for your lack of imput regarding world affairs in the last 50 years.

I'm sure Ann Coulter, when she's not eating pie, can talk with you some more about the unfair treatment of Joe McCarthy.

Well, first off, didn't you invade Germany TWICE? Also, I guess you didn't know that NAZI is an acronym for a German National Socialist Workers Party. That's right...Hitler was a Socialist! Didn't the Jewish genocide give that part away?

As for doing nothing, it seems we did plenty...we just didn't kill over 522,000 of our own soldiers doing it! By the way...why DO we still have troops in Germany...and Italy...and Japan...and Korea...

Oh, two more things, as far as putting a stop to Communism, what Joe McCarthy did was not totally fruitless...unfortunately, it drove the would-be Communists of Hollywood into the Democratic camp...under the guise of Liberalism. Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't it Ronald Reagan who toppled the Berlin Wall...and forced the Soviets to stand down on their Nuclear Arsenal?

Gee, I guess those two minor events don't account for much...


[edit on 25-10-2004 by Toelint]

Originally posted by keholmes
billybob

At least in person you don't perpetuate the stereotype, well until you speak that is....I think�..I�ll have to get back to you on that one.

so you picked a name thinking that with your views people might think you hickish??? is that what you were after?? if so at least you realize it.

close. i picked the name to be inoculous.

Originally posted by keholmesI was really beginning to get concerned that maybe I was missing something, until you whipped out the line about the libertarian socialist, nuf said.... About the only thing I�d like to hear from him is his own internal arguments with himself.

although I�ve got to say at first I couldn't understand how manufactured evidence is damning...now I do, at least for you.

your loss. you have closed a road of understanding. it is manufacturing CONSENT, not manufacturing evidence. why get caught up in who the messenger is? it is the message that matters. he clearly documents media compliancy with the agendas of whichever administration is current. if a libertarian socialist informs you that you are standing in the path of an oncoming eighteen wheeler, do you not jump out of the way because he was as libertarian socialist? i don't agree with chomsky's politics(in fact, he gets his paycheck from the same corporate tree that his polar opposites do, and he is only acting like a lefty), but he is a very logically minded scholar. you may dismiss people based on their politics, but i dismiss nothing.

Originally posted by keholmesjust a quick guess....are you an attorney....if so did you prosecute those people in california that ran the day-care?

no. i'm a surfer granny biker.

Originally posted by keholmesand as to M. Moore he reordered words to change the intent....you can spin it any way you want...but he made the speech say what he wanted not the speaker, and that is b___ s___

which particular speech are you refering to? i haven't seen F911. i watched 'the big one', and 'bowling for columbine', so i can only comment on those two.
could you relate what moore made this person say, and then show what he actually intended?

here. i'll throw you a bone. i think michael moore is a mouthpiece for the 'new world order'. he wants to disarm the populace. i think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing. i think charleton heston is so adament about guns because he knows that american freedom will have to be won in a civil war, again. he sees the pattern. i watched him while moore tried to make him uncomfortable by talking about the six year old killing the other six year old. i saw that heston was pained by it. he is no monster(well, he could be, but i have no evidence that suggests that to me). nor is he moses. he is a scared human. that was one thing moore's movie 'bowling for columbine' did well. it showed that the main motivating force in america is fear. americans are scared of everything.

billybob 5 - opponent 0.

Most reviews of the pie throwing slapstick video considered it funny viewing, which could have been improved upon only if the custard had met its target.

The target woman in question is clearly insane, which (I guess) explains why she has a small following of acolytes at ATS.

Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
billybob 5 - opponent 0.

Most reviews of the pie throwing slapstick video considered it funny viewing, which could have been improved upon only if the custard had met its target.

The target woman in question is clearly insane, which (I guess) explains why she has a small following of acolytes at ATS.

Ditto.

Coulter is clearly a vampire.

Originally posted by MaskedAvatar
billybob 5 - opponent 0.

Most reviews of the pie throwing slapstick video considered it funny viewing, which could have been improved upon only if the custard had met its target.

The target woman in question is clearly insane, which (I guess) explains why she has a small following of acolytes at ATS.

slapstick video! clearly insane! haha! a following of acolytes! HAHAHA!
you kill me, man. such precision attacks of wit. priceless.

What I wanna know, is who unleashed the downer vibes? When I signed off this thread Friday, it was perfectly and ridiculously absurd.

H-e-l-l-lo People.......It's been largely over looked - SHE WAS NOT HIT- it is not assault unless someone is actually HIT.

The poor slobs are being charged for the damage to the stage, and the clean up costs.

That is not infringing on her free speech!

And no it is not like 'if they could get a pie smuggled in, they could just as well have brought a gun'.---guns are not made of whipped cream.

And leave Hillary alone.....she couldn't even say she wasn't a cookie baker with out getting jumped on......if she even came close to being as mean as Ann C. , there would be riots.....lynch mobs....

And as to Repuplicans having too much class...I had the impression the guy wanting to use acid pies was on your side. Thats soooo much classier than laughing at Annie being MISSED by whipped cream.

Sadly, the last couple of pages have gotten so nasty, they would be going almost too far for the mud pit. Sigh....you guys can't even stand to see us have a good laugh without getting bent.

And whoever said women would kill to look that skinny, should have said 'would die to look'......except for those legs...they ain't pretty.

She was lightly wounded - one grazed her shoulder. Give the beeOtch a purple heart!

Only women that want to look like adolescent boys want to look like Coulter.