It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Who cares who is firing, they are being fired on, they should be protected.
A NATO-member has all rights to call any other member to help them protect themselves.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
Who cares who is firing, they are being fired on, they should be protected.
Your basically agreeing with John McCain that we should be supporting the fighters in Syria then.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by ManFromEurope
A NATO-member has all rights to call any other member to help them protect themselves.
Seems like your missing the point, if a NATO member has all rights to call any other member to help them protect themselves by placing Patriot Missiles in Turkey Aimed at Syria and Russia See's this as a threat. I wonder how would Russia respond you think?
Just sit there doing nothing by talking?
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Seems like your missing the point, if a NATO member has all rights to call any other member to help them protect themselves by placing Patriot Missiles in Turkey Aimed at Syria and Russia See's this as a threat. I wonder how would Russia respond you think?
post by Agent_USA_Supporter
If you were paying attention here on ATS as a member Russia also had canceled the advanced SAMs to Iran, Sryia already has the advanced SAMs that they got from Russia.
Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by ManFromEurope
A NATO-member has all rights to call any other member to help them protect themselves.
Seems like your missing the point, if a NATO member has all rights to call any other member to help them protect themselves by placing Patriot Missiles in Turkey Aimed at Syria and Russia See's this as a threat. I wonder how would Russia respond you think?
Just sit there doing nothing by talking?
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter
Patriot Missiles are defensive, not offensive.
reply posted on 28-11-2012 @ 12:00 PM by BrokenAngelWings33
I think all missiles are "OFFENSIVE"
Arizona Sen. John McCain has endorsed setting up Patriot missile batteries to enforce a no-fly zone in Syria, which the Republican believes will be critical to quell the violence that has raged in the war-torn country for more than 20 months.
Installing Patriot missiles in neighboring Turkey could provide rebels with the infrastructure they need to topple Bashar al-Assad's regime, says McCain, who is the ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and a retired Navy fighter pilot.
"Pilots are not going to fly into certain death. I don't care how brave they are," he says. "You shoot down one or two of them, and they're not going to fly there again. They may like Bashar al-Assad, but they like to live a little more."
Syrian rebels have called on NATO to establish and enforce a no-fly zone, a tactic that helped opposition fighters in Libya. Some countries worry this could drag them into the Syrian conflict, but McCain says this can be accomplished without "boots on the ground."
"I guarantee you, the first Syrian aircraft we shot down, that would be the last one to fly over a no-fly zone," he says.
"I say that Israel is a terrorist state, and its acts are terrorist acts."
That unequivocal denouncement of Israel by Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Monday, made before a conference of the Eurasian Islamic Council meeting in Istanbul, will undoubtedly be shared by many Muslims, while disconcerting Western countries, including the pro-Israel government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper.