It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MortPenguin
reply to post by exponent
Yes, I think it could add credence to the moon landing hoax theory. However we were debating whether the photos had been desaturated or not. Upon showing you proof of this you called me a liar.
Originally posted by MortPenguin
The quote I posted mentioned desaturating inaccurate blue tints. I would ask that you don't call me a liar when I haven't.
Correct me if wrong but I don't think moon landing hoax theorists pressume NASA's official position would be to admit manipulating the photos to cover up a hoax.
Originally posted by mrkeen
Soviet Lunokhod was an unmanned mission which installed a reflector as useful for research purposes as the ones brought by the Apollo missions. This means that there is no direct connection between installing a reflector on the moon and sending people there. It could all be done using an unmanned remotely controlled rover.edit on 8-12-2012 by mrkeen because: minor edit
Originally posted by mrkeen
Soviet Lunokhod was also equipped with a similar reflector, and it was an unmanned mission.
Originally posted by Anunaki10
They for example say >>The photo of the American flag on Lunar surface shows that that flag is flattering, and there is NO air on the Moon, so the Moon mission must be hoax!
Originally posted by I1Am1Ready1Are1You
after watching this myth busters episode I have ruled out the lunar landing is a hoax.
Originally posted by captainpudding
You're missing the most important part. There are blueprints for Lunokhod, there's a paper trail of its existence. There's a list of names of people who worked on it, there are people who saw it launch, there are records of the USA detecting a launch, there's records of the data it beamed back from the moon. Lunokhod exists, there's undeniable proof that it exists . . . where is ANY proof, even a doodle on a napkin that this unmanned american launch took place?
Originally posted by mrkeen
Or the well-known lunar landing module and rover could be modified to support unmanned operation by installing remote control circuitry.
Originally posted by mrkeen I am just replying to your post where you said there could be no unmanned mission which could install a relfector.edit on 10-12-2012 by mrkeen because: minor edit
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Not sure if... well, anyway your point about scandinavia is absolutely 100% wrong.
Originally posted by I1Am1Ready1Are1You
reply to post by Anunaki10
I mean I now believe we did land on the moon makes me question a lot of my "other" crazy conspiracy beliefs.