It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PsykoOps
reply to post by exponent
Thank you. I'm gonna have to bookmark this post. I have an eerie feeling that I will need to reference it in the future
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Do you think this is a backdrop
Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by nOraKat
Do you think this is a backdrop
Texture of grass in foreground is different from the background or is it the fact it's at the edge of a hill and the background is FURTHER away so you can't see the detail of the grass, that sounds familiar what if you had dust and small rocks in front of you at the edge of a small hill and the mountains in the background are some distance away
Originally posted by MortPenguin
Exponent. Your second attempt was much better. I superimposed yours onto the photo and it doesn't match. The first and last pole shadows almost match my correction exactly.
Originally posted by tigercat1971
The original problem still remains : there are no tyre tracks and given that quite clealry there are footprints then there is absolutely no reason whatsoever why there should not be any tyre tracks. Whatever reason can be invented to excuse the lack of visibility of tyre tracks would be applicable to the footprints.
Originally posted by MortPenguin
Originally posted by Ove38
When Apollo shadows are like this.
AS17-136-20744
Originally posted by exponent
Sorry, what do you see as the problem here? A curve in the terrain will cause a curve in shadows and by taking the scene I used before from the opposite side you can see converging and parallel shadows in the same image: