The Extermination of the white race

reply to post by AKINOFTHEFIRSSTARS

Kind of a cop out don't you think? In a thread about race, you admit to brown and black race and claim they are natural, yet say white is not and it is not a race?

As to the human race I know quite a lot about it. I also know that in this world including many who are white, there are those who would like to see white's extinct. Not equal rights for all which is what I fought for. Over the decades there has evolved a phony history of what has happened. An example being whites were responsible for slavery. Whites were responsible for transporting the slaves to different parts of the world. Most of those enslaved were enslaved by there own people and sold. Not talked about much as it is much easier to put it all on whites.

Your psudo-intellectual statement that whites are unnatural is allowed on here, but should someone bring up the differences by race of intelligence as rated by those same scientists you claim to have learned from they are called racists. There are differences in groups of people and it can be quantified. Each group DOES have different abilities the same as different strains of corn do. One day when all have been fully mixed that will no longer be true but you will lose the special abilities. Some strains of corn are grown because they can survive with less water, or produce more ears, or are more bug resistent but once those strains are mixed again you lose those abilities. That is just the way it is.

In your defense these days you do not need to think to get a degree, just pay the money and put in the time and regurgitate what is feed you. You can not help being a product of your times but big words do not equate to big thoughts.

As to your apparent intelligence. You accept what a archeoligist states concerning the biology of how a scorpion got a certain way as true without bothering to have it confirmed by someone who studies biology shows more that you are impressed with degrees then with science.

Blonde hair and blue eyes are caused recessive genes, when combined with dominant genes such as black hair then most of the offspring will have the latter. The recessive genes can still combine, and maybe a few generations later a blonde hair blue eyes child can still be born... but the overall effect is that the dominant genes will be in the majority so after many generations of interbreeding the pure blondes slowly die out.

This is not a bad thing at all, except for racists who see the white race as dominant and the black as being submissive - such as neo-nazis. The idea that blacks are actually dominant when it comes to genetics just eats them up inside. We white people have dominated the planet through colonialism and exploitation for long enough, maybe its time for the blacks to get their revenge through genes!

I look forwards to the day when we're all the same color, because maybe then racism will finally come to and end.

I say:

In with the new - and out with the old.

The world is in need of something new.

Originally posted by KentuckyMan
My point is we are all different race's for a reason...
It's not coincidence.
Not mere fate we have different race's that have survived so long.

Your not see the obvious right in front of your face.

Until the 20th century, people lacked mobility. If an American wanted to see India, he had a LOOOONG voyage ahead of him. Now? We can book a flight and be having supper in Mumbai in 8 hours. So yes, we mingle a lot more with other races.

Some people fall in love and marry. You would take that away from us?

reply to post by KentuckyMan


It's called survival of the fittest. If you can't adapt, your batch of genes perishes. Some other group of people taking your land/jobs/women? Figure out a way around it. If you can't, you deserve to perish. That's nature.

The traits best adapted to surviving whatever the environment-natural or man-made cooks up-those are the superior traits. White people have had a good run, but things change.

There are plenty of white losers out there. Whiteness isn't a guarantee of quality. Cultivate relationships and breed with intelligent, noble, attractive, kind, honest, hard-working people. Spend a long time observing who those people are, and act accordingly.

My own opinion on this is It comes down to biology 101 or maybe biology 1, my 7th grade science teacher all the way to my professor in college drove it home, Mendells Law, I believe that's where the whole classifications come from and coming up with concepts of who is genetically better or superior (recessive as opposed to dominant genetics), but more relevant to the OP in America back in the days of slavery and since, it was a stigma to be racially mixed so the the discriminators and racists of the day in power used some really stupid rules to discern who was black(colored) or who was white (pure), my birth certificate says colored, how do you like that?

But most of the racial identification of biracial offspring with a black parent is almost always black at least most that I grew up with maybe a few exceptions to that, this whole mess really started with miscegeniation laws though.

Miscegeniation Laws and History

Will the white race be exterminated though ? no I really do not think so or any other for that matter, at least no time in our span of life, unless some virus develops that kills 100% of a certain racial dispersion.

reply to post by polarwarrior

First paragraph correct. I have no problem with that. Second paragraph shows your white guilt, racism, and political correct upbringing but you probably do not see it. As you see it whites are responsible for all that is wrong with the world and it is time for the blacks to get their revenge. lol. Oh and IF we take that as true then whites SHOULD be in charge of the world. By your statement they are the most powerful,the most intelligent, they were responsible for the modern world with all its wonders or otherwise they could not be responsible for all that is wrong. You can not have it both ways.

Myself I think the Chinese, those from India, the Japanese, even the Mongols who almost conquered all of Europe would find offense at you saying that whites were responsible for everything. Another view would be to blame the intelligent students for the inability of the less gifted to learn. Kind of stupid. Oh WAIT! We do that now don't we? Mods I am trying to debate this without crossing the line of the T&C. If you feel I have failed at that so be it.

Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by paganini

 

OOA is only a theory. It is not set in stone as fact so any argument stating that we all started in Africa is irrelevant. Irrelevant because it's not proven as fact as we are still finding new hominid species all over the world.

Mmmm...no, not really. The earliest traces of Hominids begins there...so regardless how long the migrations took, it is still all linked to Africa.

Here is a fascinating website if you are curious about the origins of Hominids, the different branches that didn't make it and the timelines associated with it.

Smithsonian Human Evolution Timeline

I already put it out there...all races as we know them today developed in isolation due to varying environmental conditions...it is called Environmental adaption...and it is not evolution. There is a difference.

Originally posted by luciddream
reply to post by sligtlyskeptical

 

and which god would that be?

The brown Christ? or the modernized blonde/blue eyes Christ?

The blue Shiva?

The elephant headed Ganesha?

The faceless/image less Allah?

The flying Spaghetti monster? which would wipe you out because you eat all the pasts and noodles?


If there was a god, it would not look at skin colour.

The gods are our creators. Not Gods in the religous sense. We were suppose to be taught not to merge our genetics.

reply to post by Snsoc

I agree with most of what you said. Only one problem. We do not live in NATURE. We have removed nature from the situation and have placed artificial rules in place to prevent nature from working. Man-made rules are not nature. The interesting thing about this thread is the almost gleeful tone of those promoting the extinction of the white race by those posting in it. Especially by those who claim to be white. If they truly believe that those that are white, the white race, should be gone then why are they not advancing their cause by eliminating themselves. Or are they like Thomas Jefferson who was against slavery and freed his slaves.......only upon his death?

Originally posted by Jerk_Idiot
would find offense at you saying that whites were responsible for everything.

I would find it offensive if someone said "whites were responsible for everything" too.

Come back when you can debate what I said, rather than making things up and attributing them to me then debating those irrelevant things you made up. If you decide to lie instead of debating my post then it suggests you have no valid argument against it, because if you did you would have used it instead of resorting to the straw-man.

Originally posted by Jeremiah65

Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by paganini

 

OOA is only a theory. It is not set in stone as fact so any argument stating that we all started in Africa is irrelevant. Irrelevant because it's not proven as fact as we are still finding new hominid species all over the world.

Mmmm...no, not really. The earliest traces of Hominids begins there...so regardless how long the migrations took, it is still all linked to Africa.

Here is a fascinating website if you are curious about the origins of Hominids, the different branches that didn't make it and the timelines associated with it.

Smithsonian Human Evolution Timeline

I already put it out there...all races as we know them today developed in isolation due to varying environmental conditions...it is called Environmental adaption...and it is not evolution. There is a difference.

That doensn't necessarily mean that Homo Sapiens Sapiens originated OOA. Homo Denivosan (sp?) and Neanderthal didn't come from Africa.

By your logic we are all related through a single celled organism that eventually gave rise to fish, reptiles, mammals, amphibians, mammals, etc.

And believe it or not, the Smithsonian is not a very reliable source, note I say very reliable. They have been known to hide things from the general public.

I haven't read every post on every page of this thread, but the OP reads strikingly similar to a white-power type of propaganda.

I will say this, the sooner we all become the same color, the better off the world will be. Racism, discrimination, white/black power propaganda, will be no more.

I personally could care less how white you wanna be, or how black someone else wants to be, because underneath the color on the surface, we're all still the same human beings. And together, we are all one race. The human race.

Deal with it.

I think from memory genetically speaking there are only africans and asians that could be physically classed as separate races, and this difference is so small as to be negligible, the rest of us are mixes
from wiki

Modern definitions of what constitute the distinct races of humanity are still rooted in taxonomic classifications first developed in 18th and 19th century Europe, before the later availability of many tools of modern science, in particular population genetics (see descriptions in the article Race (classification of humans). Part of the discussion surrounding the definition of "race" among human beings has overlapped in the past with debates regarding what constitutes a distinct species, known as the "species problem".
Since the 1960s a majority of scientists have come to understand the concept of race as a social construct mapped on to phenotypes in different culturally determined ways, and not as a biological concept. A 2000 study by Celera Genomics found that human beings largely have similar genetic input, and that citizens of any given village in the world, whether in Scotland or Tanzania, hold 90 percent of the genetic variability that humanity has to offer. The study found only .01% of genes account for a person's external appearance.[20] Biological adaptation also plays a role in phenotype of bodily features and skin type. According to Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, "Skin color and body size are less subject to genetic influence since they are also affected by exposure to the sun and diet, but there is always a hereditary component that can be quite important."[21]

A lot of what people call race is a genetic difference of .01%, wow that's tiny. There is no white race It's all cultural, social and appearence based misconceptions IMHO I think to be classed as a separate race they would have to be a different species of homosapiens with enough genetic difference to be classed as a separate species. That's just not the case.

reply to post by kimish


Homo Neanderthalensis is a direct descendent of Homo Heilderbergensis which covered Africa, Asia and Europe. There is also Homo Erectus (Asia and Africa) that shared a common timeline with Heidelbergensis as well...about 500,000 years as a matter of fact.

The human tree sprang and lost branches for millions of years until there was only two...Sapiens and Neanderthals...which died out approximately 30,000 years ago or so.

Sharing a commonality with a single cell that gave way to ever developing multitudes of species...yep...that is how life began...and that is how evolution works.

You seem to imply that you don't believe in evolution. That's fine, you can believe what you want to believe. I choose to believe that science is pretty close to having it right even though some details have been lost and the "exact" path cannot be ascertained. Suffice to say the gaps are smaller than the facts. We know most of what happened and when.

reply to post by mobtek


There's the same difference percentage in the races as there are in the male and female sexes. Granted that's a small percentage but undeniably the difference are not small.

Black african with natural red hair and green eyes.....now that would be interesting..

reply to post by Jeremiah65


I believe in evolution but I also don't believe that all races came from the same hominid.

Like the Chinese for example, the majority of their scientist believe that their race evolved from Homo Erectus

reply to post by kimish


True......And many Oriental peoples are Whiter than White....but in a different way to Europeans....ie eye/hair/lip colour.

reply to post by kimish


Well I am definitely not a specialist....not by any stretch. I can honestly say...I do not know anything from my own field research...all know is what I have read...so...for what that is worth.

I can only give a nod that it is possible that Asians maybe evolved from Homo Erectus...some scientist "assume" that it was possible for Sapiens and Neanderthals to interbreed...so...if that is the case, who knows...maybe the Asians are from sapiens and erectus interbreeding. If the genetics were close enough for a sapien neandethal union then perhaps our DNA is full of remnants...I know some say it isn't and others are not so sure. I am not a geneticist so I have to take the info with a grain of salt when it is in conflict like that.

The jury is out I guess.

But back to the OOA theory. Even if the Asians rose out of Homo Erectus...the Europeans out of Neanderthal (which is supposedly not the case)...etc...etc...etc...it still goes back to the earliest of the Hominids in Africa. THAT IS the origin of the species, that is where the earliest Hominids first appear...about 7 million years ago.

The real crux is...the earliest Hominid remains we have discovered does not have viable DNA to compare with. Some say we all came from one species, but yet...without the DNA evidence of the earliest hominids...we really will never know if we have remnant DNA or not.