reply to post by Jerk_Idiot
Jerk Idiot :
Went went from unnatural to genocide. I understand your tactics. But I will not entertain them. I think you were offended by my first post. The
problem I can't seem to understand is the fact that your so emotional and disturbed by what I said as if it were offensive, or "racist". Go back
and reread and put your emotions to the side. Lets not get into the genocide subject unless we are willing to consider its birth, and what nations or
shadow groups fuel the fire. Enough with insults we can converse and debate without insulting each other and trying to have the dominant opinion.
I believe healthy debates may offer insight and can educate both parties.
If you look at my beginning post, my intentions were not catapulted towards anyone to try to shut them up, I just offered my analysis, which imho, I
find it to be very accurate. You became emotional and tried to attack me. Deal with people how you wish to be dealt with.
Ok so talk this "science" to me, I have a research background in Chemistry, Biochemisty, and Genomics. I feel I am at least a little qualified to
talk to the subject, so please put down what "science" is involved here.
First I am not intimidated nor concerned about your degrees, so to parade them around is completely unnecessary. It was "Scientist" and
"Biologist" that exclaimed publicly that blacks were physiologically incapable of operating aircraft and not only were they wrong, many of the
so-called "Blacks" out performed many others and created records.Did you read my 1st and 2nd reply??? I did not nor am I here to attack anyone.
Many of these threads result in people becoming emotionally driven and attacking people for expressing what widely recognized as the truth. I can not
help it if you refuse to let go of the grip that you have on your own beliefs. How can one accept anything with a close hand or a close mind? I read
many of your post, and I believe we are offering the same thing. For example
Actually in the case of humans it is a social construct, You can't point to definitive differences between so called races, and you sure as hell an
not use genetics.
Perfect example. I have said something similar in my post. So I personally think your argument is with the other "racist" people in this thread
You did not state "set in stone facts". What you stated was what is the "norm" for science and biology today. But remember, hundreds of years ago
the Earth was flat.
This is theory that was purported by Europeans. There are plenty of oral traditions within many cultures that upheld the contrary.
And if you were to read my posts and do research (being open minded) you would agree with me more. And I did provide 2 links in a post that are just
as valid as the scientist and biologist claiming OOA theory.
I did not click on your links, I will apologize for that. There is alot going on here. I will give it a shot. Im am not like other people in this
thread, I will read what you have to say and consider it. But at the same time I would like for people to put there false sense of pride to the side
to at least consider and research the basis of my post. I am not racist, nor do I promote racism. I am simply stating facts and people are getting
upset as if I made them up.
Bone density and shape of the femur bone and cranium capacity are all different amongst the 3 main races. That would make those differences biological
hence a biological construct. Also, hormone levels are different amongst the races as is center of gravity and muscle types (ie. fast twitch and slow
twitch) All of those are biological differences which are different amongst the races making race a biological construct.
You mean "Negro"(derives from the word necro which is a greek prefix meaning death), Mongoloid and Caucasoind right???
These are old outdated terms that can be challenged and thrown out very quickly. For example people from the country of Ethiopia do not share the
same physiology as someone from Nigeria or the indigenous people of palestine which are so-called "black" yet they are classified under the same
category because they are so-called (black or negro which is spanish for black). This is incorrect and invalid. If race is a biological construct,
or lets say it this way, if race was based on biology within the so-called "black" race you will find about a dozen races. This way of dividing the
human family is inaccurate, obsolete and a poor way to establish a connection with the rest of the human family.
I have read about the cranium capacity but the only problem I have with that is the same results can be found in many different people regardless of
their point of origin, nationality or so called "race".
Peace and Blessing to all