The Extermination of the white race

page: 17
21
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 11:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by kimish

Originally posted by Noinden
reply to post by kimish
 


Actually in the case of humans it is a social construct, You can't point to definitive differences between so called races, and you sure as hell an not use genetics. Again I say this as someone with a working knowledge in several sciences (as i n I've worked using my PhD (chemistry) and masters (Biochem, specifically Bioinformatics)).


With all due respect you have failed to look at the facts, How can forensic pathologist determine the race of an individual through skeletal remains without seeing the color of their skin? But yet they do, correct?



Not correct, they determine a probability that some one belonged to a "racial group". This is based off of old ideas. There is more variation inside a so called racial group than between. So making measurements of bones is really a crap shoot.




posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 11:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by kimish
Anti racism is anti white.

Read through every post of this thread and prove me wrong,


You have the onus of proving it right as you made this claim.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 12:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by boot2theface
Hmm... Considering the white race has caused more calamity and injustice throughout history than all other races combined; I feel it's good riddance. BTW I'm white, but I've just been raised in such an incredibly racist environment(rural Georgia) that I cannot stand it anymore. I for one say good riddance to the white man, and welcome our new caramel skinned brothers.


Apart from what the Chinese have already invented, most other things in use to-day were discovered/invented by whites, so its good riddance to the inventors of the modern world?



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 12:41 PM
link   
reply to post by poloblack
 


Are you telling me you lack reading or comprehension skills? I know you have access to communications or you would not be on here. Yes I am saying "It is BECOMING PC to be racist and discriminatory against white men." I did NOT say it is full blown yet but heading that way. It started four years ago with Holder. It really showed after Obama won, not by him but by ALL the news organizations and by posters on this site or can you not read very well like I already asked? It is visible in this thread with people saying they are happy or they do not care if the white race disappears. I am not worried about that occurring but the obvious RACISM involved, just change the word white with brown or black and see what happens, is what bothers me. If it does not bother you then you are as bad to me as the KKK was back in the 60's. You are FOR racism so long as it is not you on the receiving end.

As to your ancestry which I notice you keep bringing up in your posts. Do you really think it matters? You apparently do which means that race to you is very important. Race as in color of skin which you keep bringing up equals racism. I bring it up to show hypocrisy, you bring it up as if it is vindication.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 12:42 PM
link   
reply to post by KentuckyMan
 


Have you ever seen Polynesian people? The women are very beautiful and the men are usually very fit and handsome. They are supposedly a mixture of all the races. If our descendants end up looking like that and end up fighting less becuase there is no "other", I have no problem with it.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 12:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by pikestaff

Originally posted by boot2theface
Hmm... Considering the white race has caused more calamity and injustice throughout history than all other races combined; I feel it's good riddance. BTW I'm white, but I've just been raised in such an incredibly racist environment(rural Georgia) that I cannot stand it anymore. I for one say good riddance to the white man, and welcome our new caramel skinned brothers.


Apart from what the Chinese have already invented, most other things in use to-day were discovered/invented by whites, so its good riddance to the inventors of the modern world?


The logic is loose with this one...
No, but seriously anytime someone even considers race as a factor in anything it is racism. Subconscious or Intentionally.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 12:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by pikestaff

Originally posted by boot2theface
Hmm... Considering the white race has caused more calamity and injustice throughout history than all other races combined; I feel it's good riddance. BTW I'm white, but I've just been raised in such an incredibly racist environment(rural Georgia) that I cannot stand it anymore. I for one say good riddance to the white man, and welcome our new caramel skinned brothers.


Apart from what the Chinese have already invented, most other things in use to-day were discovered/invented by whites, so its good riddance to the inventors of the modern world?


I would implore you to do a little more research. There are numerous scientific and medical advances produced throughout Africa and the Arabic world. An area of specific interest would be Arabic advances in medicine in the 8th and 9th centuries as a starting point.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 01:00 PM
link   
edit on 29-11-2012 by AllIsOne because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 01:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by openminded2011
reply to post by KentuckyMan
 


Have you ever seen Polynesian people? The women are very beautiful and the men are usually very fit and handsome. They are supposedly a mixture of all the races. If our descendants end up looking like that and end up fighting less becuase there is no "other", I have no problem with it.


Where the hell did you get this ? Polynesians have huge instances of type II diabetes, brought on by weight issues. They are not a mixture of all the races.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 01:59 PM
link   
It's just skin color, big dang deal. I don't see it as losing an entire race and honestly we are all human beings of varying shades of brown, why is the color of skin even an issue?



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 02:10 PM
link   
Another funny thing i forgot to mention is i wouldn't doubt if most the posters here who are clinging to "whiteness" and wishing to preserve the so called white race are part of the European ethnic groups that were treated like garbage in this country and were segregated precisely because their people weren't viewed as whites,


Its amusing how times change.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 02:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by paganini
Another funny thing i forgot to mention is i wouldn't doubt if most the posters here who are clinging to "whiteness" and wishing to preserve the so called white race are part of the European ethnic groups that were treated like garbage in this country and were segregated precisely because their people weren't viewed as whites,


Its amusing how times change.


Some of as not from the USA remember, though I lived there 10 years



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 02:25 PM
link   
reply to post by MaMaa
 


Why skin is an issue:

1) It helps some individuals to separate one human being from another

2) It serves as a rating system by which one human being may be preferred over another

3) It creates a global class system by which entire skin groups are rated as per the above

4) It creates political classes through which ability for self-governance is evaluated

5) It creates division within communities, which is helpful in controlling the populace

6) It is helpful for the authorities in that they have the ability to suspect illegal activity

7) It creates fear of those who are not like themselves

Overview:

Racialism (the concept of separating skin colour into 'races' and their inherent competencies) was invented by English 17th century colonists in order to justify removing and replacing the governance of those colonies. The social engineering experiment was so successful that, now 400 years later, a certain portion of the western world continues to believe that it has any relevance at all. Most of Europe has officially pulled back from this idea, but the populations still buy into it.

Say something often enough and people will start to think it's the absolute truth.
Anybody see Nibiru today?



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 03:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by Jerk_Idiot
reply to post by poloblack
 


Are you telling me you lack reading or comprehension skills? I know you have access to communications or you would not be on here. Yes I am saying "It is BECOMING PC to be racist and discriminatory against white men." I did NOT say it is full blown yet but heading that way. It started four years ago with Holder. It really showed after Obama won, not by him but by ALL the news organizations and by posters on this site or can you not read very well like I already asked? It is visible in this thread with people saying they are happy or they do not care if the white race disappears. I am not worried about that occurring but the obvious RACISM involved, just change the word white with brown or black and see what happens, is what bothers me. If it does not bother you then you are as bad to me as the KKK was back in the 60's. You are FOR racism so long as it is not you on the receiving end.

As to your ancestry which I notice you keep bringing up in your posts. Do you really think it matters? You apparently do which means that race to you is very important. Race as in color of skin which you keep bringing up equals racism. I bring it up to show hypocrisy, you bring it up as if it is vindication.
I have excellent reading and comprehension skills. Your screename fits you to a T! How the hell is it becoming ''pc'' to be racist and discriminatory towards white guys when YOU'RE the majority and you guys ULTIMATELY run everything in this country, and damn near everywhere else? And don't bring that bullsh!+ up about Obama, because he doesn't run ANYTHING. He receives his orders from WHITE GUYS behind the scenes, and he's merely a figurehead marionette. Your childish, playground insults only show your true state of mind. The majority of posters here said nothing of the sort about being happy the white race disappears. You're an unfunny joke. I bring up my ancestry to prove a point. How the f^@k can I be racist when I have mixed ancestry? You are the racist. My wife is white and our daughter is mixed, so what the f^@k are you babbling about ME exercising racism? Your analogy comparing blacks and the KKK is so stupid, it really doesn't deserve a response. Even if black people felt that way, the numbers just aren't there to be able to pull that off, you intellectual colossus. You seem to think you're some profound ass guy, but, your name says it all, JERK IDIOT. With your line of thinking, if it was up to YOU, I'd still be picking cotton and calling you ''massa''. JERK.
edit on 29-11-2012 by poloblack because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 07:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Noinden

Originally posted by kimish

Originally posted by Noinden
reply to post by kimish
 


Actually in the case of humans it is a social construct, You can't point to definitive differences between so called races, and you sure as hell an not use genetics. Again I say this as someone with a working knowledge in several sciences (as i n I've worked using my PhD (chemistry) and masters (Biochem, specifically Bioinformatics)).


With all due respect you have failed to look at the facts, How can forensic pathologist determine the race of an individual through skeletal remains without seeing the color of their skin? But yet they do, correct?



Not correct, they determine a probability that some one belonged to a "racial group". This is based off of old ideas. There is more variation inside a so called racial group than between. So making measurements of bones is really a crap shoot.


Determination of a body's race to within the three main races is rather easy and all done from the skull. Pinpointing a specific sub-race is becoming rather difficult though. But amongst the three main races the differences can be seen in the nasal cavity and size and shape of the skull.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 07:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by wingsfan

Originally posted by Noinden

Originally posted by kimish

Originally posted by Noinden
reply to post by kimish
 


Actually in the case of humans it is a social construct, You can't point to definitive differences between so called races, and you sure as hell an not use genetics. Again I say this as someone with a working knowledge in several sciences (as i n I've worked using my PhD (chemistry) and masters (Biochem, specifically Bioinformatics)).


With all due respect you have failed to look at the facts, How can forensic pathologist determine the race of an individual through skeletal remains without seeing the color of their skin? But yet they do, correct?



Not correct, they determine a probability that some one belonged to a "racial group". This is based off of old ideas. There is more variation inside a so called racial group than between. So making measurements of bones is really a crap shoot.


Determination of a body's race to within the three main races is rather easy and all done from the skull. Pinpointing a specific sub-race is becoming rather difficult though. But amongst the three main races the differences can be seen in the nasal cavity and size and shape of the skull.








Sorry but that is an outmoded idea based on pregenetic science. Skull measurements are now akin to phrenology. What makes that above statement (which is united I note) stand out as outdated is the use of the word race. This has nothing to do with being PC and everything to do with modern understanding of genomics and evolution. Humans are 99.9% similar, and we are 99.5% similar to Neanderthals. Statistically the tiny % difference can not account for biological variance of the idea of race (subspecies) that early 20th century science thought skull measurements held.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 07:55 PM
link   
reply to post by KentuckyMan
 


Your arguments died when the fact that there are no races but humanoids who scattered in a hunt for survival to then evolve is a fact.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 08:17 PM
link   
reply to post by wingsfan
 


Bone density and shape of the femur bone and cranium capacity are all different amongst the 3 main races. That would make those differences biological hence a biological construct.

Also, hormone levels are different amongst the races as is center of gravity and muscle types (ie. fast twitch and slow twitch) All of those are biological differences which are different amongst the races making race a biological construct.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 08:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by wingsfan
 


Bone density and shape of the femur bone and cranium capacity are all different amongst the 3 main races. That would make those differences biological hence a biological construct.

Also, hormone levels are different amongst the races as is center of gravity and muscle types (ie. fast twitch and slow twitch) All of those are biological differences which are different amongst the races making race a biological construct.


Care to cite what year that idea was proposed? Because it no longer holds water.



posted on Nov, 29 2012 @ 08:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Noinden

Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by wingsfan
 


Bone density and shape of the femur bone and cranium capacity are all different amongst the 3 main races. That would make those differences biological hence a biological construct.

Also, hormone levels are different amongst the races as is center of gravity and muscle types (ie. fast twitch and slow twitch) All of those are biological differences which are different amongst the races making race a biological construct.


Care to cite what year that idea was proposed? Because it no longer holds water.


Lol believe he is citing Blumenbach from the late 1700s isnt he?





new topics
top topics
 
21
<< 14  15  16    18  19  20 >>

log in

join