posted on Nov, 26 2012 @ 03:42 PM
reply to post by AfterInfinity
I clicked on the link to the ATS thread you believe is telling the truth . Lots of government websites and some links were not available. If you want
me to believe a long and convoluted thread with loads of photographs and arrows and circles and lines - pointing to objects with comments that - TELL
ME WHAT TO THINK then I am going to be all the more convinced that there was no plane.
The pieces of debris - some had no marks on them - they looked brand spanking new not like something that had just been blasted off an inflight plane.
Lots of information can actually be disinformation. A small clear video clip can be all that is needed to provide proof.
Liars and deceivers may talk incessantly and provide loads of visuals - all to achieve a pre-determined aim - to get their version believed -
regardless of whether it is the truth. Actually - liars can take ages to tell their lies and then tell another to cover the previous etcetera. You
have directed me to a thread that actually underlines - for me - the fact no plane hit the pentagon and that an elaborate effort has been engaged in
to project the version of events the cabal/illuminati/whatever want the public to believe.
No plane but lots of fragmented pieces of evidence. When evidence is continual without a single gap and without a single doubt as to credibility then
and only then can it be accepted. Test the evidence and string it together to make a continued line of enquiry. No plane in the air prior to the
The government of America and its armed services could not detect and track a plane that was in the air and then suddenly approaching the pentagon -
give me a break. NASA can photograph an object the size of a lolly paper on the moon and they cannot detect a plane off course.
edit on 26-11-2012 by Amanda5 because: grammar