posted on Dec, 3 2012 @ 12:24 AM
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by Cade
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by sealing
With a 44 foot tall Rudder that 757 had to be feet off the ground .
The Pentagon is 73 feet tall. So he was under 30 ft. And where's the plane if
his approach was anything but a ground hugging 500 mph straightline ?
I see nothing decending in the video.
edit on 29-11-2012 by sealing because: punctuation
Have a look at this analysis of the last few seconds of data from AA 77's fdr :-
The aircraft clipped the first light pole at a height of approximately 31 feet ( that is about 1000 feet from the Pentagon.) The final radio altitude
reading was 4 feet. So in the final 1000 feet, which took a little over a second to cover, it descended some 27 feet.
You have proven that a light pole was clipped, but where is the evidence it was an airplane? The question is, if you can arrange a massive coverup on
a global scale that fools MOST of the people [I said "most"] is it impossible to make a light pole fall? The light poles does not explain how the
fuselage could penetrate the outer ring while the engines could not penetrate the outer wall. You are accepting two opposing realities, it's called
cognitive dissonance. Wake up and cross the two wires in your head.
The point is not that a lightpole was clipped but that several were and their positions left and right required an aircraft with a wingspan like a
Boeing 757 ( 124 feet 10 inches ) to accomplish that. The only alternative it seems to me is the silly idea that secret operatives felled them in
broad daylight with cars backed up and thousands of people around and no-one saw a thing !
You keep banging on about the engines not penetrating the Pentagon even when you are linked to pictures like these clearly showing engine debris
So this proves 911 was done by alqueda?
How come there is not a single video of an airplane impacting the pentagon? And again how come the cctv footage from nearby shops was never returned
to the rightful owners after the feds took the videos for national security reasons?
And how come people are claiming the planes hitting the twin towers had no windows and a blue logo?
Something has to give eventually. Unless it was in inside-outside job with astronomical odds against this!
And I still have a hard time believing ANY PLANE could penetrate steel-reinfoced concrete walls, regardless of speed of the airplane.
I also have a hard time believing cave dwelling muslim fanatics that only took a few courses in florida were somehow good enough to fly an approach
crash course into the very short pentagon. They would have to fly an unbelievably shallow approach to fullfill the mission. I doubt even the best
seasoned pilots could do it!
Nothing adds up. Sure the light poles were bent severly. Sure there was SOME WRECKAGE found at the pentagon but how about answering my other
Also people said an aircraft of some size flew over the pentagon, at the same time something else hit the pentagon.