It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Never looked at the original image have you. Here's a hint: there's a hole.
So cameras can't automatically zoom? Better tell my camera then (it autozooms when I switch modes) The fact that you asked a question and then immediately dismissed the answer shows exactly your attitude here. You're pretending that you're considering what I am saying, but in reality you're dismissing it without question.
Ace didn't prove that, he just proved that one shot was rebroadcast with a banner on it. Are banners on live events particularly unusual in your country as they are definitely normal news footage here.
My point is that ace thinks the whole video was faked in a few hours but also thinks that some are real time modified. He uses whatever bizarre rationalisations are needed to fit in with the idea that it's a 'nose-out' and not just protruding debris. The other films prove that it is just debris, and that's why Ace calls them fake.
Look at yourself. Not only are you denying things that are plain to see, but you're inventing excuses for them just in case it is true. You're not looking at the evidence, you're looking at how to come to a particular conclusion.
Enough said, you don't want to know what happened that day, you just want to repeat this idea that everything was fake all because something that looks sorta somewhat like a fuzzy blob protruded from the towers. Prove me wrong.
Ernst Welteke, the President of a German central bank, says that his bank has done a study. “There are ever clearer signs that there were activities on international financial markets that must have been carried out with the necessary expert knowledge.” His researchers have found “almost irrefutable proof of insider trading.”
In August 2006, Scripps Howard/Ohio University conducted a poll that concluded, “more than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East.”
Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission John Farmer states in his upcoming book, “at some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened.”
In the fall of 2003, former National Security Advisor to President Clinton, Sandy Berger, “removed classified documents from the National Archives, hid them under a construction trailer and later tried to find the trash collector to retrieve them, the agency’s internal watchdog said Wednesday.” [...] “Berger took the documents in the fall of 2003 while working to prepare himself and Clinton administration witnesses for testimony to the Sept. 11 commission. Berger was authorized as the Clinton administration’s representative to make sure the commission got the correct classified materials.”
Originally posted by WoodSpirit
There's a a hole indeed, but not one that would form such a debris cloud.
Don't know what you are on about, the guy said he changed the lense, but the picture dkidn't show any difference in zoom, it was a proven lie.
Not filling half the screen obscuring the money shot of the biggest news story ever. That is not normal
it was never broadcast again I think, and I know it has been removed from the archives and replaced with other footage which looks as if it was broadcast that way, that day. I know, cause I looked for it.edit on 28-11-2012 by WoodSpirit because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MRuss
How do you account for the suspicious stock trades before 9/11? There are too many to list here, but it's well known. And in fact, there were investigations about this. For example:
2) Zogby International took a poll that concluded “half (49.3%) of New York City residents and 41% of New York citizens overall say that some of our leaders “knew in advance that attacks were planned on or around September 11, 2001, and that they consciously failed to act.” That's a big number. How do you account for this?
Especially since the main stream media wasn't contributing to that idea at all. Where and why did such a large number of people come up with this idea? Is everyone crazy but you?
3) Care to account for the following high level statement?
4) There are several indications that Osama Bin Laden has been protected, and even allowed to escape after the 9/11 attacks. I mean, I couldn't believe the guy lived as long as he did. In this day and age, the fact that they couldn't find a 7 foot man if they wanted to was beyond the belief of most of the people in the world. Lots of documentation on this if you'd like to see.
5) Care to comment?
6) Hard to dispute that several companies friendly to the Bush Administration as well as others, and several partners in the “War On Terror” have benefitted from the 9/11 attacks. What say you?
7 )ex-CIA Analyst Ray McGovern was asked what he thought could be the possible motives for (the gov) doing something as horrible as 9/11. He mentioned an acronym for “O.I.L.” that he created. “O for oil, I for Israel, and L for the logistical bases necessary to exert military capability in that part of the world.” Do you find it interesting that people much smarter and more qualified than you feel there was something behind 9/11?
I think you're facing an uphill battle my friend.
He says he introduces a 2x TC element into the lens path. Having the camera automatically zoom out so it frames the exact same scene is not something that I'd find too shocking. It's not a proven lie just because you say so.
What a shock, again it's not normal because you say so. It seems that all of your 'evidence' is just your personal preference.
So that's the crux of your argument is it? Everyone is lying, everything is fake because you say so and there's no way a news station would use a banner on 911? Come on man, it's a very weak claim.
Originally posted by WoodSpirit
Hard time reading or on purpose?
He lies because he didn't change a thing, the pic is exactly the same before and after the fade.
In your world every anamoly is normal even though they are stacked up to the ceiling.edit on 28-11-2012 by WoodSpirit because: (no reason given)
How many times does it have to be explained to you that it could easily be the camera zooming out. 1 * 0.5 * 2 = 1 By your logic those multiplications don't exist.
Anomalies are normal and it's common to have lots of them. Enough said.
Originally posted by WoodSpirit
Unbelievable, why would you put on extender if you are not going to zoom in, it´s bull.
No, just beginning, the coming days there will be anamolies you won´t be able to deny away.
Btw, how many people are in your team?edit on 28-11-2012 by WoodSpirit because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MRuss
Well, thanks for staying up and answering my questions. I thought your replies were intelligent and your points were taken.
I am not invested in whether or not 9/11 was an inside job. I do believe that there are a lot of unanswered questions--and I'm not sure your answers were all palatable. For instance---9/11 stock trading. It's easy for some government agency or insider to declare it all a misunderstanding of some sort and close the books. If you're getting your answers or ideas from people who are heavily invested in a cover-up, then they're not really answers.
For some reason, a lot of things don't add up for a lot of people. For some, it's more than a feeling.
I'm not surprised the movement is dying. So did the JFK assasination eventually------but I suppose you are an Oswald was the only shooter fan.
Whatever is going on in this world---we just let it go on. Lies, murders, deaths, loss of liberties, immorality, loss of freedoms, celebrity worship-----pick your poison.
But no one has the energy to fight it all anymore.
We just throw up our hands and walk away.
That's a sad thing.
Do you have the inclination that the government is lilly white in all manner of events?
Or is it just 911?
Now you claim that you know what the cameraman was thinking! All to try and stick to the claim that a blurry blob is a plane nose.
People have been saying that for over a decade
I don't have a team. It doesn't take a team to see that Ace Baker is off his rocker.
Originally posted by WoodSpirit
He said he put on the extender to zoom closer, but there was no change in zoom, this is the 4th time.
Actually he said he added the extended because he knew that he would have to zoom further. The plane impacted before the extender was on.
Originally posted by WoodSpirit
You were a debunker in 2001?
I am going to love to see you weasel your way out.
You sure write for two.
Also, again, it is not about Ace, pictures don't lie.edit on 28-11-2012 by WoodSpirit because: (no reason given)
There was no extender put on cause the image didn't change, you are obviously playing games here.
Pictures constantly lie. Especially when they're viewed with an integral bias. If you don't think pictures lie, go look at any advertisement.
I have explained this multiple times. Please read my posts or I am done with this 'conversation'.