reply to post by Arken
Wrong side of the building for a start.
There is something moving toward the building, and you can see part of that above the building before the explosion. However, I personally think that
whatever it is is moving too slowly to be a jet, and you would see more of the jet than that. It would have to be almost taxiing along the ground at
hundreds of miles an hour for it not to be visible, and that just isn't plausible to me.
I'm not saying there was no plane, and I'm not saying there was. It just doesn't make much sense at all.
I have to ask though, if someone went to all the trouble to get planes packed with passengers hitting the towers for all to see, and they want to
claim that one hit the Pentagon, why NOT just do the same at the Pentagon?
Why would they use real jets in one incident, and then risk their story being totally destroyed by using something else at the Pentagon? It makes no
sense to do that.
I am adamant, after all that I have seen and read about the incidents, that three planes hit three buildings, and one was taken down in a field. What
I argue about is who was behind it, who ALLOWED IT to happen for their own needs, and who covered up what in the aftermath.
IMO, Mossad did this to force the USA into Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Iran... They did this to create mass hysteria against their Islamic enemies, and
some in the US allowed it to happen in order to make a hell of a lot of money for themselves.
There are just FAR too many things about these events that do not make any sense. There is too much evidence to show that some in the US (in senior
positions) knew something was happening, and that some very wealthy people made a hell of a lot of money off the back of this too.
Always follow the money and always see who benefits the most.
Incidentally, Bin Laden was a US asset for many years. Isn't it just a little strange that a man who made a career through the support of a
government would suddenly go solo? No, he just switched who he was working for.