Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

The Giants Of Ancient America: “8′ Tall With Double Rows Of Teeth”

page: 7
135
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 11:11 AM
link   
Interesting lecture. However, I don't see why Vieira thinks that these stone chambers were created by giants. The size of the doors and the height of the ceilings are too low, certainly built by the standards of the modern man and even shorter. It is possible that some giants did take a part in building these, but they certainly weren't the engineers and architects of the structures. They were obviously planned by people and for people similar to us, who, evidently, were the dominant part of the population.

I won't go into the very relevant connection of gigantism and Radon mentioned here, because entering a little search with these two key words can return the answer. For me, these giants were rather people with medical condition but not a race, even less a sort of alien beings.

How eight-foot giants would enter and stand in this chamber? Why making it so uncomfortable for themselves?





posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 11:22 AM
link   
reply to post by stiver
 


And the winner is stiver!

You have to ignore facts like this to believe this stuff.


"Oh giants!" And suddenly people's brains turn off.



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 11:22 AM
link   
reply to post by nighthawk1954
 


Here's a thread from a while back:

Man-Eating Giants Discovered in Nevada Cave?

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I think some new evidence - either writings or more archaeological data - has been uncovered recently that supports the tales, but I'll have to search for the link.



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 11:31 AM
link   

Originally posted by nighthawk1954
I have seen the one in Mass. No way ancient Indians or early settlers made these structures.
Once again science denies their true origins.

______beforeitsnews/science-and-technology/2012/11/the-giants-of-ancient-america-8-tall-with-double-rows-of-teeth-2498484.html
edit on 26-11-2012 by nighthawk1954 because: (no reason given)


Nonsense:

members.home.nl/jbmeijer/bouweng.htm



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 12:09 PM
link   
Forgive my ignorance but why hide this information? What is gained by anyone that keeps this a secret, money, power or what? I find the post to be very interesting, i will be researching this more to get a better understanding.
Thank you.



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 12:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by SPEZNA1
Forgive my ignorance but why hide this information? What is gained by anyone that keeps this a secret, money, power or what? I find the post to be very interesting, i will be researching this more to get a better understanding.
Thank you.


This conspiracy was created to explain why the evidence is never found - its not that the evidence doesn't exist its because X is hiding it all.....


The lack of any real motive is rather transparent



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 12:18 PM
link   
In Moundsville, W.Va., If I remember the story correctly, 12 foot tall skeletons with red hair were found there too. There was also a stone found, that had the same type of writing that's on the pyramids. New Yorkers took the stone and said they were gonna put it in a museum, but the rock was never seen again. I think they claimed to have misplaced it or deny that it ever existed. That's always been the rumor here, anyways.



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 12:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Logarock


People working under the direction of the Smithsonian dug up giants. And that the Smith hids finds is well know.....just call the Chicago Museum of Natural History.


You were asked to provide evidence not a directive to me to do something.....



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by lambs to lions
reply to post by randyvs
 


Absolutely. Who has the right to withhold the truth? It makes me sick. Our children should be able to view the world as an adventure waiting to happen. The Smithsonian is effectively squashing many inspirations.


Does there exist any evidence that the Smithsonian has done these things or do allegations without evidence equal conviction or 'real' in your world?
edit on 27/11/12 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 12:25 PM
link   
While watching the OP video, I found the following image interesting:



So I went on a search for the above image and discovered this article, which accompanied the image:



The article explains that the Smithsonian took tissue samples, analyzed them and determined that the tissue was actually gelatine. This was a hoax.

greaterancestors.com...



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 12:32 PM
link   
reply to post by LeatherNLace
 


Hmmm. Under the right conditions, tissue could turn to a compound similar to Gelatin. How long ago was that done. Did the people at the Smithsonian testing this know how Gelatin is derived? Not many people today are aware of the fact that we are mostly made of various sorts of glucose.



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 12:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by LeatherNLace
 


Hmmm. Under the right conditions, tissue could turn to a compound similar to Gelatin. How long ago was that done. Did the people at the Smithsonian testing this know how Gelatin is derived? Not many people today are aware of the fact that we are mostly made of various sorts of glucose.


Manufacturing oddities was quite the business in the 18th to early 20th century you could find mermaids, etc in many traveling circuses and curiousity shows



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 12:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by nighthawk1954
 


If you're decended from Nephilim then you need to be destroyed. They were cannibals, eating humans for food. That's part of the reason why jews were forbidden to eat pork, because pork is indestinguishable from human meat once it has been cooked.



Originally posted by GrimReaper86
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
 


Cook a lot of people and compared the two have you?



Originally posted by rickymouse
Hey, that's good to know, do you spice it the same way as pork?





This is actually a pretty well-known fact. There are a few modern cannibals around who have been interviewed about this on video. I'm sure you can find them, if you're so inclined. I had a hard time eating pork for quite a while after I first learned this. But yes, that is what earned human meat the nickname of "Long Pig."

There was actually a decent little thread on ATS regarding this very topic about 2 years ago:


Long Pig: Can You Pass The Ketchup and Breasts Please...?


Funny how some threads you can never forget.
I actually remember reading this one the night before christmas 2010. I was actually having a terrible day, and was in a morbid, dark mood for reasons I'll not get into, when I found this thread, which not only made me laugh (I have a morbid sense of humor sometimes) but fascinated me enough to distract me from my own funk.




Originally posted by TheComte


That is not why Judaism prohibits the eating of pork.


Of the "beasts of the earth" (which basically refers to land mammals with the exception of swarming rodents), you may eat any animal that has cloven hooves and chews its cud. Lev. 11:3; Deut. 14:6. Any land mammal that does not have both of these qualities is forbidden. The Torah specifies that the camel, the rock badger, the hare and the pig are not kosher because each lacks one of these two qualifications. Cattle, sheep, goats, deer and bison are kosher.


www.jewfaq.org...




This has nothing to do with why they can't eat pork -- these are simply the distinguishing traits of the animals which they can and can't eat. Nowhere does it say why. Correction, if memory serves I think the word "unclean" pops up somewhere. But that still is not a full explanation.
edit on 27-11-2012 by iwilliam because: (no reason given)
edit on 27-11-2012 by iwilliam because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 12:54 PM
link   
reply to post by Hanslune
 


Yeah, looks like they made all sorts of interesting stuff back then
My third or fourth cousin, however you would put it, traveled with the circus for a couple of years. He had Giantism. he was about eight foot four and real. He lifted my grandmother onto a wagon when she was a kid, that is what she told me anyway many years ago

My sister had huge bones and joints and bad Rheumatoid arthritis, possibly a connection to the genetics.

Edit....I guess he was only seven foot nine, I saw eight foot four but that is the size of the statue they are planning to make for him up north. Bigger than life is what man does, wasn't seven foot nine big enough
edit on 27-11-2012 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 12:59 PM
link   
reply to post by nighthawk1954
 


Oh Wow! I never knew this: io9.com...



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 01:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by nighthawk1954
 


If you're decended from Nephilim then you need to be destroyed. They were cannibals, eating humans for food. That's part of the reason why jews were forbidden to eat pork, because pork is indestinguishable from human meat once it has been cooked.
I wonder why the biblical god couldn't destroy all traces of them, even though he tried?



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 01:12 PM
link   
This ties into Ancient Alien theory a lot more than people realize.



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 01:12 PM
link   
reply to post by nighthawk1954
 


Conventional science likes to hide things that do not fit the textbooks, but sacered texts af many religions talk about giants and Nephilim. heck, even JRR tolking knew there was an age of giants and then the age of humans. He was on to something



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 01:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gidonb4IN
reply to post by nighthawk1954
 


Conventional science likes to hide things that do not fit the textbooks, but sacered texts af many religions talk about giants and Nephilim. heck, even JRR tolking knew there was an age of giants and then the age of humans. He was on to something


Then how do you explain the finding of the Denisovans and Homo Floresiensis?

JRR wrote a lot of fantasy.......
edit on 27/11/12 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 27 2012 @ 01:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by Gidonb4IN
even JRR tolking knew there was an age of giants and then the age of humans. He was on to something

Tolking?

Maybe he didn't know what he was tolking about.

Really. You're using a fantasist to make a point about reality?

Where's all the elf bones?

Harte





new topics

top topics



 
135
<< 4  5  6    8  9  10 >>

log in

join