It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Anonbeleiver77
Sorry to repeat myself
but if it was a hoax... where the .... did the apollo rockets go for days at a time?
They hide behind sputnik?
I suppose the Russians who where tracking the whole thing where in on it too?
As well as the tracking stations down here in Australia too they where able to fool radio telescopes that can see into deep space into seeing something that wasn't there go to the moon and came back?
I supposed they paid or threatened every astronomer, every radar operator, every one with a telescope, every major
country in the world into going along with the most expensive hoax ever?
For what?
Your a bunch of idiots seriously
Making me angry I got on here to report something that really happened to like minded open minded people...
to say that something that the whole world watched in so many ways witnessed and so many put so hard work into was a hoax....the greatest achievement EVER! EVER!!!!! in the history of mankind is a hoax???!!!!
MORONS!! Its you lot that make everything else on here seem a joke...
What we can't go to the moon but UFOs are real?
Take a look at your logic
its just not possible it was a hoax!!!!
HEAVY SHIELD UNNECESSARY — Heavy shielding as protection for an astronaut against space radiations may not be necessary, at least for trips of less than 50 hours and at distances not greater than 618 miles from earth…. [B]iological specimens were encased in different types of metal to test their effectiveness as shielding materials. Some specimens were shielded only by the thin aluminum covering of the specimen capsule and the comparatively thin shell of the recovery capsule. Radiation dosimeters showed that aluminum provided better shielding properties than lead and that any heavy metal such as gold or lead becomes a hazard during a solar flare as high energy protons interact with these heavy metals to create damaging X-rays.
Of primary cosmic rays, which originate outside of Earth's atmosphere, about 99% are the nuclei (stripped of their electron shells) of well-known atoms, and about 1% are solitary electrons (similar to beta particles). Of the nuclei, about 90% are simple protons, i. e. hydrogen nuclei; 9% are alpha particles, and 1% are the nuclei of heavier elements. [10] A very small fraction are stable particles of antimatter, such as positrons or antiprotons, and the precise nature of this remaining fraction is an area of active research.
Originally posted by Anonbeleiver77
Sorry to repeat myself
but if it was a hoax... where the .... did the apollo rockets go for days at a time?
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
There was no "shielding" per se -- at least nothing that was put there specifically for shielding. HOWEVER, the structural mass of the Apollo command module did provide adequate "secondary" shielding for the task at hand. The aluminum skin, the fibrous insulation, and even the heat shield all contributed to this "passive" radiation shielding.
To get through the Van Allen belts, NASA relied on a quick journey through the belts rather than on providing purposely-built shielding against the radiation. The speed with which they passed through the belts exposed the astronauts to higher-than-normal radiation, but nothing that would necessarily be harmful.
Once past the belts and on their way to the Moon, there was a risk of a major solar flare occurring (one pointed the astronauts' way) which would have exposed them to potentially harmful radiation levels, but that sort of flare never happened during an Apollo mission.
The bottom line is that while the astronauts were exposed to more radiation than the average person living on Earth, they exposure was not dangerously high -- at least not a danger that would necessarily cause illness.edit on 3/9/2013 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by turbonium1
To get through the Van Allen belts, NASA relied on a quick journey through the belts rather than on providing purposely-built shielding against the radiation. The speed with which they passed through the belts exposed the astronauts to higher-than-normal radiation, but nothing that would necessarily be harmful.
Once past the belts and on their way to the Moon, there was a risk of a major solar flare occurring (one pointed the astronauts' way) which would have exposed them to potentially harmful radiation levels, but that sort of flare never happened during an Apollo mission.
edit on 3/9/2013 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)
This is the real bottom line - Apollo spacecraft didn't have adequate shielding for the environment(s) beyond LEO
What else can be concluded from the facts on hand?
As we know, the Apollo spacecraft shell was mostly made out of aluminum. Here's a list of materials for the structure...
"The inner structure is of aluminum sandwich construction, which consists of a welded aluminum inner skin, adhesively bonded aluminum honeycomb core, and outer face sheet.[Edited for brevity --DJW001]
More details on the heat shield..
"..a phenolic epoxy resin, a type of reinforced plastic.." [Edited for brevity --DJW001]
"..aluminum is a poor radiation shield material to hazardous outside of LEO applications"
Good laboratory practice is important to keep radiation doses low. To reduce bremsstrahlung, (90)Y should not be shielded by lead but instead perspex (10 mm) or aluminium (5 mm). Bremsstrahlung radiation can be further reduced by adding a millimetre of lead on the outside of the primary shielding material. If suitable shielding is used and larger numbers of handlings are divided among several persons, then handling of beta emitters can be a safe procedure.
If you think this makes an effective radiation shield, let's see the proof for it!
The current designs do not use ANY of these materials for radiation shielding, to my knowledge. That shows just how effective they are.
It's only 'effective' for Apollo spacecraft, it seems.
Originally posted by turbonium1
Originally posted by Anonbeleiver77
Sorry to repeat myself
but if it was a hoax... where the .... did the apollo rockets go for days at a time?
They hide behind sputnik?
I suppose the Russians who where tracking the whole thing where in on it too?
As well as the tracking stations down here in Australia too they where able to fool radio telescopes that can see into deep space into seeing something that wasn't there go to the moon and came back?
I supposed they paid or threatened every astronomer, every radar operator, every one with a telescope, every major
country in the world into going along with the most expensive hoax ever?
For what?
Your a bunch of idiots seriously
Making me angry I got on here to report something that really happened to like minded open minded people...
to say that something that the whole world watched in so many ways witnessed and so many put so hard work into was a hoax....the greatest achievement EVER! EVER!!!!! in the history of mankind is a hoax???!!!!
MORONS!! Its you lot that make everything else on here seem a joke...
What we can't go to the moon but UFOs are real?
Take a look at your logic
its just not possible it was a hoax!!!!
It's one's opinion, like any other
Why are you so angry about the hoax opinion?
You believe it was real, like most people do.
Who cares? What's the problem?
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by Anonbeleiver77
what they just went into orbit and stuck around for a few days and came back sat in quarantine and popped out and pretended they'd been to the moon?
The spacecraft would have been one of the brightest objects in the night sky as it circled the Earth every ninety minutes. The Soviets and Chinese would scream bloody murder.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
Apollo was on the moon for a matter of hours. The next landings are planning on staying there.
Originally posted by Ove38
The spacecraft went to the moon without any humans on board, as usual.
Originally posted by captainpudding
Originally posted by Ove38
The spacecraft went to the moon without any humans on board, as usual.
Do you have any proof of this? To me, it would be far more impressive to perform this mission with 60's robots than humans. I mean, you'd have to make a humanoid robot that could climb a ladder and drive a car, that's pretty freaking cool.
Originally posted by Zaphod58
reply to post by Ove38
Even three days is still insignificant compared to how long they're planning the return mission to stay. You're talking 72 hours (a matter of hours) as compared to 6+ months. NASA plans to be back by the end of the next decade, with eventual plans for a permanent outpost. Apollo was there for three days maximum.
Why wouldn't they sleep? I'm sure they slept just fine. After returning to the lander, they had to go over their suits, replenish supplies, etc. After that they went to sleep, got up and did it again.edit on 3/13/2013 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)