Disclosure of the moon landing hoax., page 31


Pages: <<  28    29    30    31  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 12 times


reply posted on 19-5-2013 @ 03:56 PM by billdadobbie
reply to post by choos



no what i asked was how much fuel 2/ they do need engines for braking and setting of again or did they float up


reply posted on 19-5-2013 @ 07:38 PM by Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by billdadobbie



There was no "braking" as much as there was a burn which converted the translunar insertion trajectory, or TLI (the trajectory the was set upon leaving Earth orbit) into a lunar orbital trajectory -- or Lunar orbital insertion (LOI).

The translunar insertion trajectory was one that could be efficiently converted into a lunar orbit with minimal fuel used. That same TLI trajectory was also specially calculated to easily allow for a free return to Earth (by sling-shotting around the Moon) if the mission needed to be aborted (such as was the need for Apollo13).

But in short, there was not a "braking" maneuver that was made with a big engine burn when they got to the Moon, but more of a "nudge" into lunar orbit with a relatively smaller burn.


Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "...or did they float up?"

edit on 5/19/2013 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 19-5-2013 @ 10:06 PM by choos


By the way... Nixon wouldn't be the designer or engineer -- that job belonged to Howard Hughes and Hughes Aircraft, who just happens to be the builder of the Surveyor spacecraft.
The original negotiated cost of the Hughes contract for seven spacecraft was $67 million. Final Hughes contract costs came to $365 million, over a fivefold increase;


For that amount of money (in 1960's dollars) Hughes Aircraft (the CIA front) could have build an entire fleet of Surveyors and landed them precisely wherever Farouk El-Baz wanted them to land, precisely at each location that was later claimed by NASA to be a 'manned' Apollo landing site.

If Hughes had a contract for 7 Surveyors costing $67 million...
14 Surveyors would cost $134 million...
21 Surveyors would cost $201 million...
28 Surveyors would cost $268 million...
35 Surveyors would cost $335 million...
and that leaves an final $35 million to keep people quiet.

How did Hughes keep workers quiet? Pay them people lots of overtime, tell them not to ask questions about it.


you suggesting my theory of the super advanced bi-pedal humanoid robots is correct??

i expect royalties thanks.. i might write a book on my theory.

also surveyors are not bi-pedal humanoid robots. surveyors land and dont move, my humanoid bi-pedal robots that are remote controlled by the real astronauts can move, drive the rover, can put footprints on the moons surface, jump around as well as plant the flags and other science experiments.

hughes aircraft co. spent all that money on not only building the surveyors but designing them to work as well which unfortunately costs money. R&D is never free as much as you would like it to be.

Pages: <<  28    29    30    31  >>    ^^TOP^^



Dumbing down reality
  Posted 5 days ago with 103 member flags
The 800 Pound Gorilla Everyone Ignores
  Posted 16 days ago with 67 member flags
The Illusion of Choice and Truth
  Posted 10 days ago with 52 member flags
A chronical of the BANKSTER WARS
  Posted 7 days ago with 42 member flags
Conspiracy Theory:The Lost Episode
  Posted 4 days ago with 39 member flags
666, NWO, Aliens and You!
  Posted 13 days ago with 36 member flags