It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
the US Space Command won't shoot lazers at the star sensors of these new Russian explorer crafts.... like they did with those other foreign space crafts (Kaguya, Chandrayaan) and crippling them before they could reveal the true secrets of the Moon.
Originally posted by hellobruce
You really do post some nonsense, care to back that silly claim up with some facts?
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
Right after you oblige the thread by posting the locations the MISSING ascent modules, Eagle and Orion.
I find it very hard to believe that NASA could lose two ships.
Originally posted by SayonaraJupiter
...Sure I'll do that. Right after you oblige the thread by posting the locations the MISSING ascent modules, Eagle and Orion.
Because I find it very hard to believe that an operation, like NASA, that claims scientific precision and engineering exactitude... I find it very hard to believe that NASA could lose two ships. Care to comment?
We can clearly view a car from a satellite orbiting earth. Here is a satellite photograph over Area 51.
Originally posted by ppk55
But for some strange reason we just can't seem to get a clear shot of the 6 descent modules (which are bigger than a car) on the moon,
It just doesn't make sense.
Originally posted by captainpudding
Weren't those tapes confirmed as having been erased and reused?
hey meanwhile had concluded that the reels of tape with the SSTV signal were shipped from Australia to Goddard and then routinely erased and reused a few years later. Moreover, a backup copy of the tapes which had been made in Australia was also erased after Goddard received the reels.
Originally posted by captainpudding
reply to post by turbonium1
Constellation was a plan for a long term lunar presence (ie moon base)
Originally posted by captainpudding
not a quick round trip like Apollo.
Originally posted by captainpudding
Also, they never attempted to go to the moon they only planned it and once the budget proposal was made congress told them they couldn't have the funding needed so it was scrapped. Unfortunately unless someone finds oil or an Al-Qaeda camp on the moon, the funding just isn't there.
Originally posted by DJW001
Building more boats requires more money. Building ever more specialized boats requires that much more money. Rockets are a known technology; their history goes back over a thousand years. Spacecraft are more recent, but they built upon technology developed for aircraft. There was nothing special about the technology used in the Apollo program; in fact, the current generation of spacecraft draws upon the technology developed then.
Not any for the moon?
We've crossed the English Channel countless times, in all sorts of vessels, for thousands of years.
Originally posted by turbonium1
I don't know if that image of cars is from an airplane or by satellite in orbit.
But let's say it was from an airplane, as claimed. What is the point?
That it can't be done (as well) by satellites?
It can be done, and even much better.
Not any for the moon?
Smells kinda fishy to me...
Originally posted by fenceSitter
Can someone please give me a feasible explanation as to why they would fake the moon landings? I just don't understand why they would go through that much trouble to fake it.