It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That House report was critical, and rightly so, but it didn't stop Surveyor probes landing on the moon starting a few months after that newspaper article and it didn't stop Apollo 12 popping over to visit one of them. I have some actual eyewitness testimony of that.
SayonaraJupiter
reply to post by onebigmonkey
That House report was critical, and rightly so, but it didn't stop Surveyor probes landing on the moon starting a few months after that newspaper article and it didn't stop Apollo 12 popping over to visit one of them. I have some actual eyewitness testimony of that.
So if you have actual eyewitness testimony you must be either Alan Bean or Dick Gordon because Pete Conrad has passed away. Right? That's what eyewitness testimony means. Are you Apollo Defenders now so desperate that you are impersonating astronauts on conspiracy message boards?
UndercoverJoe
If we actually went to the moon back in the sixties, why haven't the USA or any other country went back there yet? So what if you really did not find anything the first time, keep searching the moon till you do find something. Or better yet, you might find some precious, rare metals,minerals or gems on the moon, if you mine for it. I really don't think that we went to the moon and I really feel that we can't leave our atmosphere. If we could actually leave our atmosphere and go to some other planet, don't you think that we would have done it after all these years and all this new technology that we have? Nasa says that they want to go back to the moon in about ten years. If you made it to the moon the first time fifty years ago, why wait ten more years? It all sounds like a bunch of government crap to me!
choos
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
i dispute the provenance of those news article..
is there any reason why one so called legitimate article dated feb 14, 1966 has been edited with the words ($5.5 billion in 2013) and never mentioned that it has been added??
also is there any reason why these cut and paste jobs are hosted on ATS? if you want to prove the credibility of these news articles you will need to do better than ATS.
it is common courtesy to link directly to news articles from their respective sites instead of cut and paste and even edit content, so that EVERYBODY has access to the articles to review it.
UndercoverJoe
If we actually went to the moon back in the sixties, why haven't the USA or any other country went back there yet? So what if you really did not find anything the first time, keep searching the moon till you do find something. Or better yet, you might find some precious, rare metals,minerals or gems on the moon, if you mine for it. I really don't think that we went to the moon and I really feel that we can't leave our atmosphere. If we could actually leave our atmosphere and go to some other planet, don't you think that we would have done it after all these years and all this new technology that we have? Nasa says that they want to go back to the moon in about ten years. If you made it to the moon the first time fifty years ago, why wait ten more years? It all sounds like a bunch of government crap to me!
SayonaraJupiter
choos, can you please explain why you are objecting to my illustrations but you haven't objected to OBMonkey's illustrations. Fair is fair, choos.
I gave the Apollo Defenders a question that they could not answer: Who took picture AS12-50-7362?
The Bonus Question was: Given that 2 out of the 5 windows in the Apollo 12 command module were fouled, I asked: What window, what pristine, clean window, in the Apollo 12 command module was used to capture the image in AS12-50-7362?
Here is the answer that I expect from Apollo Defenders with regard to the AS12-50-7362 problem.
1. The name of the Apollo 12 astronaut who captured that image.
2. The window from which the astronaut did use to capture his image.
Frankly, choos, the failure of the Apollo Defender "team" to answer these 2 simple questions is a dead giveaway and a red flag.
This matter is settled as far as I am concerned the image AS12-50-7362 was captured by a robotic arm equipped with a Hasselblad camera attachment. And there are no images of Conrad, Gordon or Bean in any of the images captured in Magazine Q.
Your side has decided to gamble it all on the 7362 picture but you all lost that bet. Your stack of chips are now in the hands of the dealer. And I don't think the casino management (Howard Hughes) is going to lend you any more credit tonight.
SayonaraJupiter
choos, can you please explain why you are objecting to my illustrations but you haven't objected to OBMonkey's illustrations. Fair is fair, choos.
I gave the Apollo Defenders a question that they could not answer: Who took picture AS12-50-7362?
The Bonus Question was: Given that 2 out of the 5 windows in the Apollo 12 command module were fouled, I asked: What window, what pristine, clean window, in the Apollo 12 command module was used to capture the image in AS12-50-7362?
Here is the answer that I expect from Apollo Defenders with regard to the AS12-50-7362 problem.
1. The name of the Apollo 12 astronaut who captured that image.
2. The window from which the astronaut did use to capture his image.
Frankly, choos, the failure of the Apollo Defender "team" to answer these 2 simple questions is a dead giveaway and a red flag.
This matter is settled as far as I am concerned the image AS12-50-7362 was captured by a robotic arm equipped with a Hasselblad camera attachment.
And there are no images of Conrad, Gordon or Bean in any of the images captured in Magazine Q.
Your side has decided to gamble it all on the 7362 picture but you all lost that bet.
Your stack of chips are now in the hands of the dealer. And I don't think the casino management (Howard Hughes) is going to lend you any more credit tonight.
Either Alan Bean, DIck Gordon or Pete Conrad. They were all there, there are photographs of them on other magazines.
The Apollo 12 mission carried seven 70MM cameras. Three individual cameras and a block of four cameras that made up the Lunar Multispectral Experiment. There were a total of 1725 exposures made with 3-4 images produced for each of the 142 exposures on the multispectral experiment. The number of images on 14 magazines of film was; 1438 images on black & white film, 571 on color film, and 104 on infrared film.
onebigmonkey
Your stack of chips are now in the hands of the dealer. And I don't think the casino management (Howard Hughes) is going to lend you any more credit tonight.
The dealer's bankrupt.
and why are you saying we are card-stacking and betting it all on one photo when there are hundreds of photos that can prove we went to the moon?? it seems that you are the one betting it on one photo/magazine with ridiculous claims and not to mention no substance to back it up..
SayonaraJupiter
I'm calling your bluff choos. You show me one human face in the 14 magazines of Apollo 12 images.
At this very moment... I am calling every loan shark I know... so that I can double down on this hand.
If you would like to FOLD on this hand then I get your chips on this and we can start another hand. How's that?
choos
SayonaraJupiter
I'm calling your bluff choos. You show me one human face in the 14 magazines of Apollo 12 images.
At this very moment... I am calling every loan shark I know... so that I can double down on this hand.
If you would like to FOLD on this hand then I get your chips on this and we can start another hand. How's that?
can you prove that a mobot took the photo?? i want you to show me one piece of robotic equipment in any of the photos..
it cant just be merely speculation right?
oh wait i forgot it had its cloaking device on.
SayonaraJupiter
choos, If you don't have good cards at the deal it would be a good idea for you to FOLD. The mobot theory is like having 4 Aces.
Ace of Clubs. There are no human faces in the 14 magazines of Apollo 12 pictures in the 70mm catalogue. www.lpi.usra.edu...
Ace of Diamonds. Howard Hughes was testing *Top Secret* US Army navigation computers in 1938 he says that robot control "did most of the flying."
Ace of Hearts. Howard Hughes made "Hell's Angels" in 1930, a film that Stanley Kubrick listed in his top ten; it was a silent film at first, converted to a talkie, en.wikipedia.org...'s_Angels_(film)
Ace of Spades. Hughes is building Mobots and Surveyor spacecraft at the same time. There is also a mention of 3 Surveyor "test flights" and that means there were not 7 Surveyors, but TEN.
you are bluffing.
SayonaraJupiter
I'm all in. I've got 4 aces. Let's see your cards.
Do you have a straight flush?edit on 11/21/2013 by SayonaraJupiter because: to add
choos
SayonaraJupiter
I'm all in. I've got 4 aces. Let's see your cards.
Do you have a straight flush?edit on 11/21/2013 by SayonaraJupiter because: to add
straight flush???? i have a royal flush..
and ive had the cards face up the entire time.. you just refuse to acknowledge it..
how did they hide the mobot inside the command module during construction of both the command module and the saturn V??????????????????????????? cloaking device??
and by your own "evidence" of the mobot, how did they publish in 1969 after apollo 11, a plan for first launch in 1973 when they were supposed to launch prior to each apollo mission????????????????? time machine??