It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
People would still (many do) believe that the 9/11 consulate attack in Benghazi was the result of outrage over a youtube video IF some on the inside had not leaked the truth, or at least some of it. There was no threat to the national security in that case, it was a presidency trying to win an election by rewriting the truth.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Either that or it's simply those Evil Jews at it again.
"This Presidential Memorandum transmits the National Insider Threat Policy and Minimum Standards for Executive Branch Insider Threat Programs (Minimum Standards) to provide direction and guidance to promote the development of effective insider threat programs..."
Originally posted by Bleeeeep
reply to post by jude11
The way I read it is that he is saying, "no more dissidence is going to be allowed." I.E. He is warning dissenters that they will either get with the program or they will be labeled a threat and be cast out.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by jude11
What hawkiye said.
Anyone who doesn't go along with the program or questions the administration about anything:
For instance,Benghazi, or anything else they don't want questioned.edit on 25-11-2012 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
1)Petraeus made a statement of how America's biggest mideastern problem was Isreal
2) The Israelis trust Romney( Netanyahu's business buddy) more than Obama
3) Some in Washington are more seriously aligned with Zionists than others
4) Both Jill Kelley and Paula Broadwell have Zionists connectons
Both Saxby Chambliss and Diane Feinstein made comments and enacted a bill concerning intelligence leaking from the white house months before Benghazi
7) Why would the FBI investigator leak the investigation to Eddie Cantor (R senator) instead of the proper channels?
Carney said, “Well, I would refer you to the FBI. They have, as I understand it, protocols in place for when they notify the legislative and executive branches of investigations.
8) Kelley and her parents are members of the Lebanonese Christian Maronite community they claim Isreal as their ally.
9) Paula Broadwells connection to Madeline Albright and Duane Clarridge
Then you will have enough information to have a valid theory of what might be happening in Washington
And We said after Pharaoh to the Children of Israel, "Dwell in the land, and when there comes the promise of the Hereafter, We will bring you forth in [one] gathering."
Petraeus sees what so much of Washington refuses to see: that Israel's year-long contempt for Obama, initiated by the Gaza campaign, entrenched by Netanyahu's victory and compounded by continued settlements and last week's humiliation of Biden is a problem. More then a problem, Israel's total impunity for its intransigence is becoming a liability for the advance of US interests around the world.
People need to stop using that word considering it's nothing but a pc term for bigotry.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Originally posted by beezzer
Does any of this inhibit the 1st Amendment?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
en.wikipedia.org...
If so, then it's anti-constitutional. And can't be enforced.
Originally posted by jude11
Originally posted by beezzer
Does any of this inhibit the 1st Amendment?
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
en.wikipedia.org...
If so, then it's anti-constitutional. And can't be enforced.
Since when has that stopped his Lord and Master?
Obama has clearly shown over the last 4 years that he'd rather wipe his ass with the constitution than abide by it.
Peace