It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ismail
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
Yup. And others did'nt.
Isaiah 7:14 "Therefore the Lord himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call his name Immanuel.
(the translation of virgin is very liberal, the hebrew word actually means young women).
I can spout mumbu-jumbo all day, and some of it will get right. Some of it will get wrong. That's not divine, it's just statistics.
Originally posted by Ismail
So a "prophet", quoted from the book of Isaiah which according to scholars was written over a span of at least 300 years by different people, is in turn quoted in a book by an author who never actually specifically names himself "Matthew" during the whole gospel, but is still called the Gospel, of Matthew. This anonymous guy, writing nearly half a century after Jesus's death, says that an "angel" came down to Jesuses long deceased father, and said that to fullfill the prophecy that everyone was waiting for, (which was the virgin birth a child specifically named Immanuel), to instead call this guy Jesus because Immanuel means God is among us ?
I don't understand. Why do you choose to trust and even find sense in texts that have been so revised, so translated and so changed over the course of the centuries ? How can you possibly believe that you are reading original content, and not just, at best, hebrew legends revisited by the early church to justify it's existence with self-fulfilling prophecies that were tailored to be correct, because they were written about events that had already happened ?
I have another question for you. Do you consider "Daniel" to be a "real" prophet ?
Half of the hebrew names in the dictionnary could fit that part. How about Abeel ("God is my Father"). How about Abishua ("My father is deliverence"). How about Amiel ("God of my people"). Come on, I'm not even out of the A's there...
26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
Originally posted by Ismail
reply to post by Deetermined
If Daniel is a "real" prophet, they how did he get so much wrong ?
No, I don't think the gospels have the same author. I think some of them have many different authors, and that they most certainly were not written by the people you believe wrote them. As I said, how do you know Matthew wrote the gospel of Matthew ? Not once does the author actually identify himself, and modern scholars (the majority, the ones who have nothing to do with nutty evangelists) estimate the book to have been written around the first century. And that's just Matthew.
26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.
Yes that's nice and all, but since this was written after the "events", then again it's a self fulfilling prophecy. "Hey I just wrote a text that I'll say is contemporary to Jesus, and in that text, I'll say that Jesus says my text is cool." Do you see how frikkin' easy this is ? You are quoting the book itself as a justification of the books veracity. Pardon me, but that makes no sense at all. In fact it's quite frightening that anyone could possibly be so gullible as to believe that.
Look, I grew up in a religious family, and I know what faith is, and what "gods love" feels like. It's great and warm and cozy and thrilling. But it's not true. You think it's coming from something that isn't you, but it's you, it's all you and only you. It's exactly the same thing as having an imaginary friend, but never growing out of it. The power of the "holy spirit" is a self-perpetuated hallucination, which allows you to feel less weak and less alone.
If you have truly gone so far into your self-induced hallucination that you justify the existence of the hallucination by refering to the hallucinations of others, and you are no longer capable of understanding why that is absurd, then I'm sorry, but your brain isn't working properly. I don't mean that in a nasty way. I mean that in a preoccupied way. You should be able to understand how absurd what you are saying sounds.
Originally posted by Ismail
reply to post by ConspiracyNutjob
More like I realized it was all in my head. And when I realized it was all in my head, it all went away. What a strange coïncidence...
"I never received the holy spirit"...
That's a good one. You people have gone so far into denial it's just frightening.
You don't even understand what a rational approach to anything is anymore...
Originally posted by Ismail
reply to post by ConspiracyNutjob
I did have faith. I just realized that faith was akin to stupidity. Because instead of encouraging you to ask questions, it encourages you to not ask questions for fear of questioning your faith. Which is also called being a moron.
If god loves me, why does he want me to be a moron ?
edit on 30-11-2012 by Ismail because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Ismail
reply to post by ConspiracyNutjob
If god loves me, why does he want me to be a moron ?
edit on 30-11-2012 by Ismail because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Ismail
reply to post by ConspiracyNutjob
Let me get this right. You are saying that GOD, an all powerfull all knowing being who created the universe, inspired one book, a book that is so historically incorrect, so filled with scientific errors, so morally offensive in parts, that most people with brains automatically dismiss it, but in your mind, I am supposed to read that quote FROM this same erroneus book, which basically tells me that I need to be stupid to understand, and you expect me to accept that as an argument ?
This guy says that he is the son of god, but he also says that only if you are as credulous and unquestionning as a child will you be able to believe him (like yeah, we agree Jesus) and you present this as an argument ? Do you understand how crazy that is ? "Jesus says be stupid or else you won't be able to believe in me" and you say OK ?
Are you µ^$%& crazy ?