Originally posted by Unity_99
...Et who is way over our heads, has the remote on time, processes everyone on earth over and over, giving missing time (on the dvd player, they have
the remote and can push pause, forward and backwards at will), can interfere with all devices, along with our paramilitary that have even been rumored
to kill, when the topic of ufology is above top secret, why would anyone presume that anyone would ever have proof, even though some have some amounts
of it, such as the implants removed, the dna on the hairs found, and other things. Also family regressions and studies. You'd have to be extremely
closed minded and anti social, ignoring the testimony of countless people, to think there is no evidence.
However, back on the evidence. Those who are more credentialed and have higher security clearance than most of the presidents of the US, don't have
proof either, just their word.
With all due respect (and I mean that sincerely), none of the things you mentioned are tangible, empirical, physical, palpable items or experiences
that can be examined, observed, or repeated in a controlled environment. Please understand that we do not mean to suggest that such things did not
and do not occur or exist.
It is often asked in the hallowed environs of ATS, usually in a bemoaning, exasperated tone, "...why, oh why, will the scholars, academia, university
researchers of the world NOT pick up this earth-shaking topic and finally give our voice some legitimacy!?!?!?"
The answer is elementary: There is nothing to study.
Analyzing grainy spots of light on a questionable video? Nope - done that. Not enough, not empirical.
Interviewing witnesses, abductees, and other experiencers using techniques such as regression hypnosis and lie-detection tests -by the multitude?
Nebulous at best. Little to document. Here-say/3rd person. Not acceptable as (peer-reviewed) proof.
Alien autopsy? Nah. A debunked film clip is not the body itself. Bring the body (or invite independent medical examiners) to participate - then you
might have something. Until then... *sigh*
UFO(IFO) landing/crash/capture/encounter? Can we have a piece of it to look at? Run a few tests of our own perhaps? NO? Nothing solid whatsoever?
Sorry - no validation can then be forthcoming - nothing to validate!
How about a good, hi-resolution, close-up photo at least? Of any ship! No? How about the inside of a ship? You know, the instrument panels,
propulsion devices -anything?!? Don't have any of those either? *sigh*
Do you see the problem? We WANT to believe - just like many of you! TRULY!
But thus far all we have been given (officially) is a few blinking lights at night, some fantastic witness accounts of what THEY saw (or think they
saw), some heart-wrenching stories from good folks that are clearly distressed by 'close encounters' - and many more of the same.
Again - there is nothing to study, nothing to examine, nothing to test, nothing for researchers to collaborate on and discuss. Is this by design of
some PTB whose motives are to keep the populace in the dark? Perhaps - and if so, they have been largely successful (and man-oh-man that must be
Yet - and the reiteration is significant - we do not necessarily disbelieve the believer (or the experiencer). I may be enthralled, utterly
fascinated, by your belief, your account of what happened to you or to someone else. And I often am!
But it hasn't happened to me. And nobody seems able to produce ANYTHING that can be held up to even the slightest scrutiny to any body of educated
men and women on this planet for them all to say, emphatically, and in unison, "IT IS SO!"
Cough up just one tiny morsel of ANY kind of ALIEN, ANY kind of CRAFT or ARTIFACT that we can touch, smell, hold, taste, and we'll jump into your
believer's boat in an instant!
Can you do it?
p.s. This ain't it: