Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by Unidentified_Objective
Do your own research.
Oh I have...I was hoping for an example that has escaped me.

Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by Unidentified_Objective
Do your own research.
Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by Evanzsayz
I never believed in alien abductions until I experienced something, nor UFO until I witnessed those too.
In fact I thought it was a Hollywood style stunt craft, I soon realised it wasn't a stunt craft, it was real.
Sometimes only experience will prove things truly.edit on 26-11-2012 by theabsolutetruth because: (no reason given)
Einstein rejected the label atheist, which he associated with certainty regarding God's nonexistence. Einstein stated: "I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being."[1] According to Prince Hubertus, Einstein said, "In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views."[16] Einstein had previously explored the belief that man could not understand the nature of God. In an interview published in 1930 in G. S. Viereck's book Glimpses of the Great, Einstein, in response to a question about whether or not he believed in God, explained:
Your question [about God] is the most difficult in the world. It is not a question I can answer simply with yes or no. I am not an Atheist. I do not know if I can define myself as a Pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. May I not reply with a parable?The human mind, no matter how highly trained, cannot grasp the universe. We are in the position of a little child, entering a huge library whose walls are covered to the ceiling with books in many different tongues. The child knows that someone must have written those books. It does not know who or how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child notes a definite plan in the arrangement of the books, a mysterious order, which it does not comprehend, but only dimly suspects. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of the human mind, even the greatest and most cultured, toward God. We see a universe marvelously arranged, obeying certain laws, but we understand the laws only dimly. Our limited minds cannot grasp the mysterious force that sways the constellations. I am fascinated by Spinoza's Pantheism. I admire even more his contributions to modern thought. Spinoza is the greatest of modern philosophers, because he is the first philosopher who deals with the soul and the body as one, not as two separate things.
Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by Unidentified_Objective
Do your own research.
Originally posted by PatrickGarrow17
reply to post by Druscilla
Given life on Earth and the size of the universe, it is not unreasonable to infer the existence of alien life. Even intelligent alien life seems much more probable than not.
I'd say the probability of alien existence is high enough where I would feel quite comfortable believing it to be fact.
You're right that anecdotal evidence doesn't hold.
But I think it's worth considering that inference and extrapolation are viable techniques in painting one's picture of the universe.

The basic points of the argument, made by physicists Enrico Fermi and Michael H. Hart, are: The Sun is a young star. There are billions of stars in the galaxy that are billions of years older; Some of these stars likely have Earth-like planets[2] which, if the Earth is typical, may develop intelligent life; Presumably some of these civilizations will develop interstellar travel, as Earth seems likely to do; At any practical pace of interstellar travel, the galaxy can be completely colonized in just a few tens of millions of years. According to this line of thinking, the Earth should have already been colonized, or at least visited. But no convincing evidence of this exists. Furthermore, no confirmed signs of intelligence elsewhere have been spotted, either in our galaxy or the more than 80 billion other galaxies of the observable universe. Hence Fermi's question "Where is everybody?".