The super man.
The amassing of a sun begins with a single fundamental does it not?
It is said that energy fuels the brain. The brain is said to be the seat of the psyche.
It is said that e=mc2 and less rigorously stated that this place is made of energy, that is from the stars to the people the media of the lattice is
Brain mass is energy, It utilises energy gained by the processing of what is called food, and was indeed created in the womb by the mother whom also
processed food, so basically transmutation which is what e=mc2 itself covers is it not? the energy of a mass and the mass of an energy (Mass being
another distinction from matter, also a theory not followed through to its conclusion and to borrow a turn of phrase: Now we have girls finding
calories in water)
If dreams are more than the sum of their parts, as are ideas and in general the psyche, or in other words you can cut a brain up and look for the
memory inside but it is not there, is not the most appropriate answer then that dreams are composed of the same as the brain and can even be looked
upon as one, similar to water in its many states.
If energy is the media of both that which we term reality and that which we term dreaming (and in a more complete view the psyche), why are the
boundaries of reality not transferred or enforced in all instances within that of the psyche (and perhaps in particular dreams)?
There are many theories of the rules of this reality, some more accepted than others, but here are a few of seemingly unmovable foundation that seem
held in high regard but even if the fruits of truth are still not followed to conclusion.
Death through entropy?
Basically when you want to send a message through space time whether that message be the seed of a life a geometrical phenomena or some other format
such as the number system upon which this very message is built they endure entropy. Understanding this, why is it that these theories of the laws of
this place are not also susceptible to this entropy? Is it that our knowledge of that which we call time and our persistence through it that we are
able to create an entity whose life is within each and on the tongues and within the ears of each?
If that is the case and it takes a collective to sustain the message (whatever form that might be let's say language) in space and time who
sustains the collective?
Further even if the collective is able to sustain the message through space and time would it still not be ruled by the law of entropy also (perhaps
like Chinese whispers but done on a much grander scale)?
Quantum something or other: A theory of the lattice of energy which is basically saying there is an unspecified volume of sand which can be formed
into anything (at least perceptually), or that within each piece of marble is every statue to be carved ever anywhere, or that the fountain cycling to
its pool might fill, in any manner, the volume which it has.
Heiseinberg aka uncertainty principle:
How precise can we be when it comes to the motion or the position? And can we use that precision to displace one or the other of the properties in
Evolution: Acceptance of the theory of evolution is acceptance of the genetic line and the wellspring which indicate that each is brother, sister,
father, mother, aunty, uncle, and however many more distinctions you would care to make. And yet brothers and sisters as well as their young are
placed on the dinner plate after what can only be termed mass genocide with no thought thanks or communion. When we cannot even see each other as
brothers and sisters what hope is there of us returning to the garden while eating it glutton style.
Is division, the theory of the separateness of things, but an illusion of perception? And if that is true who is the I that owns, the I that claims?
Is the I not built upon illusion?
Every man is an island and if my message in a bottle reaches him I am thankful and may peace be upon him.
How long do you think it was before man slept once he found fire?
edit on 25-11-2012 by usernamehere because: sky-net made me do