curious as to why this video banned,no one should coment etc,

page: 3
3
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 02:05 AM
link   
reply to post by jude11
 


No, I don't think this video deserves a "why?", it deserves ridicule. This is a joke video. Even though I am quite convinced of the reality of the UFO phenomenon, I can understand laughing at the obvious fakes being presented. Your goal of having every video thoughtfully examined and explained is not my goal. Some don't deserve it.




posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 02:05 AM
link   
reply to post by jude11
 


edit on 24-11-2012 by trysts because: dbl post



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 02:28 AM
link   
reply to post by trysts
 



Your goal of having every video thoughtfully examined and explained is not my goal. Some don't deserve it.

So you still haven't explained "Why" or "how" just that it "is"

Can't accept that as "proof"

Peace



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 02:30 AM
link   

Originally posted by elouina
Is someone actually arguing that this is real?
I think it was a cute and plotted attempt at a sci fi clip. Pointing out the bleeding noses, aiming on the dead bird, then showing everyone running to see the grand event. I wish they would have made it a bit longer though. Good job!


No one is arguing that it's real (please read the the thread)

Just that I'm asking how people can prove that it isn't real.

Peace



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 02:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by jude11
reply to post by trysts
 



Your goal of having every video thoughtfully examined and explained is not my goal. Some don't deserve it.

So you still haven't explained "Why" or "how" just that it "is"

Can't accept that as "proof"

Peace



So you need "proof" that it's not real? Define for me what is your idea of "proof", since I don't know?



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 02:39 AM
link   
LIGHT THE BEACONS

www.youtube.com...
edit on 24-11-2012 by cass1dy09 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 02:48 AM
link   
reply to post by jude11
 


Easy, just ask the person who made it.
I wouldn't bother, but you could track down the artist. Someone has to be gloating somewhere. It is human nature to be proud of their accomplishments,



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 02:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by elouina
reply to post by jude11
 


Easy, just ask the person who made it.
I wouldn't bother, but you could track down the artist. Someone has to be gloating somewhere. It is human nature to be proud of their accomplishments,


OK,

But isn't it the responsibility of the De-Bunkers to do the tracking down before posting?

Peace


edit on 24-11-2012 by jude11 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 02:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by trysts

Originally posted by jude11
reply to post by trysts
 



Your goal of having every video thoughtfully examined and explained is not my goal. Some don't deserve it.

So you still haven't explained "Why" or "how" just that it "is"

Can't accept that as "proof"

Peace



So you need "proof" that it's not real? Define for me what is your idea of "proof", since I don't know?


No, it's the de-bunkers who must define and prove it's not real.

Peace



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 03:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by jude11

Originally posted by trysts

Originally posted by jude11
reply to post by trysts
 



Your goal of having every video thoughtfully examined and explained is not my goal. Some don't deserve it.

So you still haven't explained "Why" or "how" just that it "is"

Can't accept that as "proof"

Peace



So you need "proof" that it's not real? Define for me what is your idea of "proof", since I don't know?


No, it's the de-bunkers who must define and prove it's not real.

Peace


I'll still need to know your definition of "proof". Unless you never had one?



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 03:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by trysts

Originally posted by jude11

Originally posted by trysts

Originally posted by jude11
reply to post by trysts
 



Your goal of having every video thoughtfully examined and explained is not my goal. Some don't deserve it.

So you still haven't explained "Why" or "how" just that it "is"

Can't accept that as "proof"

Peace



So you need "proof" that it's not real? Define for me what is your idea of "proof", since I don't know?


No, it's the de-bunkers who must define and prove it's not real.

Peace


I'll still need to know your definition of "proof". Unless you never had one?


Very simple.

De-Bunkers always demand undeniable, irrefutable proof with "Pics or it didn't happen" and even more "Credible Witnesses".

Why should a De-Bunker" not have to provide the same to refute the claims?

Peace



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 03:06 AM
link   
The HOAX is the title only.

The film is "entertainment"

See

What's In the Box - 2009 Test Film



See also

Half-Life - The East Accident - Official Teaser


edit on 24/11/2012 by Trexter Ziam because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 03:07 AM
link   
reply to post by jude11
 


Is the responsibility of those in search of the truth, if they are not already aware. Which would most importantly be the person most interested, the OP.



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 03:13 AM
link   
So, your idea of proof is pictures, or credible witnesses? Is that what you're saying would satisfy your desire for proof that the video is fake?
edit on 24-11-2012 by trysts because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 03:13 AM
link   
Another of their videos...



... seems they're improving their works and abilities.

the OP's vid is apparently a Dutch Commercial, for what, no idea, but it has been translated before...

from Oct of '11
www.scam.com...


Hello

My first post here. My only reason for registering is to tell you all that this is a commercial from the Dutch television.

It's not real.

Translation of what the actors said:

He: heheheheh. Go and stand on that bridge, over there by that rail.

She: you still have the lens cap on

He: I'll take it of than.

She: you're not allowed to film.

He: that's what I like to do. Go and stand at that rail over there. (pointing with his finger)

He: do something nice, make a nice pose.

He: Hey darling, (or is it dear), you're having a bloody nose

She: you too

He: "looks at his finger" and says: Oh f***. No need to translate that, lol.


Don't get fooled it's not real.


So there you go.



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 03:19 AM
link   
to any one who believes , or wants to believe that this is real - why not actually come up with some co-oberating evidence for its authenticity

the "event " if real would have been visible over a vast area - and been witnessed by / affected almost everyone in the vicinity

yet there is absolutly no other evidence

has it even occured to you to ask - why ?



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 03:19 AM
link   

Originally posted by 12m8keall2c
Another of their videos...



... seems they're improving their works and abilities.

the OP's vid is apparently a Dutch Commercial, for what, no idea, but it has been translated before...

from Oct of '11
www.scam.com...


Hello

My first post here. My only reason for registering is to tell you all that this is a commercial from the Dutch television.

It's not real.

Translation of what the actors said:

He: heheheheh. Go and stand on that bridge, over there by that rail.

She: you still have the lens cap on

He: I'll take it of than.

She: you're not allowed to film.

He: that's what I like to do. Go and stand at that rail over there. (pointing with his finger)

He: do something nice, make a nice pose.

He: Hey darling, (or is it dear), you're having a bloody nose

She: you too

He: "looks at his finger" and says: Oh f***. No need to translate that, lol.


Don't get fooled it's not real.


So there you go.


Ok, Getting closer...but,

"you're having a bloody nose" "You too"

Is this planned or an observation? Why would they speak like this?

Thanks for the translation.

Peace



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 03:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
to any one who believes , or wants to believe that this is real - why not actually come up with some co-oberating evidence for its authenticity

the "event " if real would have been visible over a vast area - and been witnessed by / affected almost everyone in the vicinity

yet there is absolutly no other evidence

has it even occured to you to ask - why ?




why not actually come up with some co-oberating evidence for its authenticity


The question is to simply ask how de-bunkers can claim that it is fake with nothing but a few words but believers MUST go further to prove their claims.

Shouldn't both sides have the same responsibility?

Peace



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 03:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
The HOAX is the title only.

The film is "entertainment"

See

What's In the Box - 2009 Test Film

See also

Half-Life - The East Accident - Official Teaser


Jude, did you even BOTHER to view these two entertainment videos? ALL of the major story "elements" are there. The close ups of the bloody hands, the tower, the whirlwind around the tower, the schrapnel and the birds.



posted on Nov, 24 2012 @ 03:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Trexter Ziam

Originally posted by Trexter Ziam
The HOAX is the title only.

The film is "entertainment"

See

What's In the Box - 2009 Test Film

See also

Half-Life - The East Accident - Official Teaser


Jude, did you even BOTHER to view these two entertainment videos? ALL of the major story "elements" are there. The close ups of the bloody hands, the tower, the whirlwind around the tower, the schrapnel and the birds.


Getting closer...thanks. I did.

But the question remains...why after 3 pages did no one else point this out?

So many just jumped on the band wagon claiming "hoax" without even going further than the OP vid.

I have been guilty of the same and ( learned a valuable lesson) have simply asked all posters here to show "Proof".

You are on it.


Thanks.

Peace


edit on 24-11-2012 by jude11 because: (no reason given)





top topics
 
3
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join