Philadelphia: No Love for the Homeless, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 22 times
Topic started on 23-11-2012 @ 09:25 PM by jude11


A few quotes:

"Ban Out Door Feeding"

"Out Door Feeding"??? Like feeding animals in a zoo?

And the Mayor:

"Food served outside on the street has a risk of food poisoning because it's not handled properly"

So all those food carts serving Philly Cheese Steaks, burgers, dogs and whatever should be shut down...right? Or is it just the food served by volunteers to the homeless that can make people sick or kill them?

"The Right to eat"

We all have the right to eat.

"Protecting the City's image as a tourist destination"

Do you really want to become a city that refuses to feed people because it looks a little "Ugly" to tourists?

So by all these points, it should stand to reason that ALL food carts are made illegal, ALL food consumed in a park like a sandwich or an apple and ALL tourists should be told that they can NOT buy food from a cart or grocery store and have a nice sunny picnic in the park.

"City of Brotherly Love"

Now, this is just one example of course. It's becoming quite clear that the homeless are increasing and the cities are clamping down on their human rights. Even to the point of being pointed out in one thread (Can't remember where it is) that the homeless have to obtain a permit to live in their cars.

And it's only going to get worse. So as individuals we have to decide if we will have to ask permission to help those less fortunate than ourselves. Remember this..."ASK PERMISSION to help"

Peace

edit on 23-11-2012 by jude11 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-11-2012 @ 10:03 PM by jude11
reply to post by Raelsatu




Is there a rational reason why donating food or shelter to the homeless is banned/frowned upon?


There is NO rational reason.

If I was a tourist and discovered my destination did this, I would by-pass that point.

Peace


reply posted on 23-11-2012 @ 10:06 PM by Happy1
reply to post by Raelsatu



I don't agree with this, but it's because if one homeless person gets "food poisoning" and decides to sue - a restaurant, a city, a person (then state regulations for food safety comes into play), a charity - who's going to pay the liberal lawyer's bill and the horrendous damages that a liberal jury will hand out?


reply posted on 23-11-2012 @ 10:07 PM by th3dudeabides
reply to post by jude11


I'm so disgusted with the lack of empathy in this country. It's time for a massive redistribution of wealth. With a country supposedly so wealthy not a single person should go hungry or homeless. Period. Until that day, I don't want to hear about a rich persons sob story about how they couldn't only go 4 1/2 star. Screw the rich assholes. They would up and kill the homeless if a license existed they could purchase, this goes for a whole bunch of other groups they consider worthless eaters.


reply posted on 23-11-2012 @ 10:13 PM by seabag
reply to post by jude11



When society teaches people that others will care for your needs then society will increasingly have more problems like those you presented. It shouldn’t go unnoticed that the homeless epidemic has accelerated in recent years and trends indicate we’re heading for an even greater increase.



When we as a society demand that all people who “have” give even more to the people who “have not” then it only stands to reason that we ALL become those ‘without’ at some point….it’s unsustainable!

edit on 23-11-2012 by seabag because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 23-11-2012 @ 10:21 PM by beezzer
reply to post by jude11



There are many people who would spend more time, rescources on the homeless if government would just stay out of the way.

Ironic, in that it is in part, governments fault (through legislation, regulations, taxation) that so many are homeless.

And now they create more regulations to inhibit help to those that they helped create?

We really need to ignore government and just go back to helping those that we can with what we have.


reply posted on 23-11-2012 @ 10:25 PM by jude11
reply to post by BobM88



Perfect!


people are being systemically devalued.


Bit by bit, belief by belief, sex by sex, income by income, status by status...Thank you.

Peace



Text



reply posted on 23-11-2012 @ 10:30 PM by jude11
Originally posted by Happy1
reply to
post by Raelsatu



I don't agree with this, but it's because if one homeless person gets "food poisoning" and decides to sue - a restaurant, a city, a person (then state regulations for food safety comes into play), a charity - who's going to pay the liberal lawyer's bill and the horrendous damages that a liberal jury will hand out?


So, watch a person starve on the street rather than run the risk of a multi-BILLION company being sued for a few dollars?

Peace
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags