It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by charles1952
Dear wulff,
I sympathize, really I do. Even after the irrelevant and derailing attacks of posters have been brought to light, they still continue. Bradley Manning, indeed. Another false equivalence. Disclosing truck loads of classfied documents and being put in jail is so equivalent to bumping off a blogger.
At least one poster provides a novel theory. The Iranian government has no control of itself. It is so upset at the way things are, they just have to go out and kill people.
So, for those who want a serious discussion, may I offer one possibility? Get the UN to declare freedom of speech a human right, then clamp down on governments that don't allow it. At least it would force the objecting nations to come out in the open and say "We don't believe in freedom of speech." Then the US could kick out the UN and start a new organization from nations which support freedom.
With respect,
Charles1952
Originally posted by randomname
but iranians are much pro-active and a protest could easily turn into an armed revolution and the storming the ayatollah and his council of elders
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by all2human
Why single out Iran?,
Why shouldnt Iran's actions be discussed? We hear all day, every day, 24/7, about things that go on in other countries around the globe all the time. So, why not show and discuss what's going on in Iran as well?
Why so defensive?
Why should this discussion be considered Taboo?
Then the US could kick out the UN and start a new organization from nations which support freedom.
Originally posted by davidmann
70 billion ought to buy something, no?
Originally posted by all2human
Why single out Iran?,how convenient OP,there are dozens of other countries who are responsible for assassination and abuse ....many other countries guilty of human rights abuses and mass murder, yet these are comparatively acceptable? agenda much?edit on 23-11-2012 by all2human because: (no reason given)
The developed countries tend to be freer, so the money and resources now sent to the UN could be used for projects supported by like minded countries interested in liberty and individual dignity.
Ok, perhaps a large portion of that is a dream, but still, who listens to the UN?
But, as apolgetic as I am, I'm also delighted to see you again, thanks for the response.
Originally posted by MarioOnTheFly
Maybe you guys should check how's Manning doing...last time I heard he was in a sh** storm of problems for not not liking and exposing what his government does...