originally posted by: Kukri
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
This is very interesting Dave. I will have to go over the links in more detail when I have the chance and decide how to proceed from there.
I also have a problem with the CRA in that they claim I owe them the ridiculous sum of$25,000.I have repeatedly contacted CRA requesting them to
explain how they calculated this "debt" but they have refused to itemize or explain how they have arrived at this figure. This back and forth has been
going on for over 15 years with no real repercussions towards me other than CRA trying to ruin my credit rating and the usual irritating calls
(private collection agency) and letters. I refuse to pay these funds including the burgeoning interest charges until they explain the calculations for
this ridiculous tax bill.
I would be interested in hearing how your challenge has proceeded. If you would be so kind to update this thread I for one would appreciate
Yes, demand an itemized accounting of the alleged charges they are claiming, which should include the principal amount they alleged is owing, plus any
penalties, plus any interest. It's like any invoice, you want to know what you are paying for, correct? If you send them a letter and they refuse to
answer your query, file a Complaint Form 193. If they still refuse to respond or do nothing about the 193, file an FOIA request for all of the
information they have on you, they have 30 days to respond, that's it by law. It generally costs $5, but it puts a whole world of hurt on the CRA
because now they have to give you EVERYTHING. They may claim National Security privilege under 16(1) or 16(2), in which case file a written complaint
to the Privacy Commissioner as this is not a national security issue.
Once you have the FOIA information, or not (but you have all of your letters and attempts at resolution documented), file a formal complaint in Ottawa
with the Bank of Canada Federal Ombudsman, they handle CRA matters as the CRA works for the BOC. What you want to do is request arbitration from the
BOC FO, but remember that this is playing their game. Remember, that in the FOIA if they provide you with the information and you have requested all
of it, it's like a legal discovery. If they start adding things later, they could likely be thrown out of court as it shows their deceit and
Just for sh*ts and giggles, you may want to also send them an invoice for the last 3 years of doing your taxes as the Taxpayers Rights documents state
that they don't expect you to pay for their work in administering their program. What I really enjoy in the taxpayers rights, is the word "volunteer"
coupled with their extortion using fines, jail, etc. Kind of an oxymoron, written by a moron.
Now, as far as my situation, I am awaiting a court date. Even though I am not supposed to be able to, I am requesting a common law court rather than a
statutory jurisdiction court. The difference in courts is that a common law court requires a victim, a statutory jurisdiction court is for the
administration of fines and nebulous other allegedly "legal" instruments under mercantile law (the UCC). There is another problem with the tax court
and that is they are operating in a very distinct and well defined conflict of interest. How can one, ethically, adjudicate or arbitrate if one has a
vested interest in the outcome? One last thing, Canada is operating under statutory jurisdiction, under the UCC a contract must be present that is
signed by both parties and some value must be exchanged. I may play with that one a bit, because I didn't sign any social contract. I know they will
babble on about social contracts, but they are invalid without the participants signing and I claim my UCC rights and understanding of not entering
into any contract with hidden clauses, bridged to other contracts and/or contracts I have not personally signed.
The other legal matters I will be exploring are Superior Law, referendums and the application of amended laws without proper ratification. I'll get a
real kick out of the proceedings if at some point they say "Country of Canada" or "Regina vs me" because that dog don't hunt here, it isn't a country,
still a colony and "Regina" proves that. I am going to try to have a sit-down with Rocco Galati in the next couple of months because our purposes are
very similar and there is a lot of common ground. So, we'll see what happens.
I just hope it isn't like my speeding tickets case overseas. I had everything set up in court, all the evidence to set a precedent to outlaw speed
trap/camera trap evidence and after five adjournments, the judge dismissed the case because the police were going to lose. The judge actually got
annoyed when I asked if I could appeal his decision to dismiss LOL. Like that case, there will be a news crew and in addition people recording for
youtube. I want to take this to the wall, show the CRA for what it is and help put the BOC back in the hands of Treasury rather than the IMF and other
"shareholder banks" which are private and/or foreign corporations. The way the government has things set up, right now, someone should actually levy a
charge of treason against those in government responsible for this obscenity.
Cheers - Dave
edit on 3/25.2015 by bobs_uruncle because: (no reason given)