posted on Nov, 21 2012 @ 08:37 AM
I'm surprised it took so look for a state to take such action. While I personally applaud this action, I think secession is a non-starter, but still
a good way to voice dissent.
The secret government had had plans to use FEMA to take total control during national emergencies through powers enacted by Bill Clinton (essentially
a legal coup), Obama has reversed these orders, and he has also reversed orders giving power to the DOD in times of emergency, enacted by Bush senior
in 1988. This is all a matter of public record, and though not easy to find, can be found if you dig deep enough.
How do we know about the secret government? Well, it is laid out in this thread:
Anyway, I'm neither pro/anti Obama, but many seem to think he is going along with the NWO agenda, where as his actions speak differently. However he
must take responsibility for some unpopular laws - these laws make no sense to a reasonable individual unless viewed through lens that the government
is aware some major catastrophe is to soon befall the US, such as a major earthquake along the New Madrid fault.
So here are some interesting tidbits from the article:
According to the Tenth Amendment Center, "a national think tank that works to preserve and protect the principles of strictly limited government
through information, education, and activism," the state legislature will consider a pair of bills aimed at protecting some basic civil liberties for
Earlier this week, Rep. David Simpson, R-Longwood, pre-filed a measure called "The Texas Travel Freedom Act," or H.B. 80, which would make it a
criminal act to intentionally touch "the anus, breast, buttocks, or sexual organ of the other person, including touching through clothing," without
probable cause, in the process of allowing someone access to public transportation.
In other words, the bill is aimed at ending pointless, embarrassing and invasive pat downs of travelers by the federal Transportation Security
Administration, among others.
Texas prepares to nullify TSA, NDAA in showdown of state
liberty versus federal tyranny
The latter bill also provides for criminal penalties against any outside authority attempting to detain persons within the boundaries of Texas
without due process under the NDAA. If passed, the bill would effectively nullify indefinite federal detention in the state of Texas, the center said,
noting that the bills appear to be aimed at the Obama administration in particular.
Was it Ben Franklin who said something along the lines:
"Those who would give up their liberty for the sake of security deserve neither"?
On a side note, this website has a lot of great quotes on tyranny, banking, the constitution etc that you won't find when you do a Google search:
Liberty tree quotes
edit on 21-11-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: addition