It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
When our government has the legal power under our Constitution to enter into deals over which our very own Supreme Court has no jurisdiction, then what distinguishes us from a colony?
Originally posted by anon4m05
I have signed this petition, do as you will. It is my opinion this deal is toxic for Canadian sovereignty, and will only lead to bad things. I STRONGLY suggest Signing, and passing it along, through word of mouth, protest, whatever it takes. This is going to be really bad for us....
Just a couple of things from this deal;
The Canada-China Investment Treaty requires that if, in the future, Canada wants to conserve natural resources (fisheries, water, oil, uranium, forests – everything is covered), and reduce Chinese access to these resources, we are only allowed to do so to the extent we limit our own use of those natural resources.
The Canada-China Investment Treaty allows Chinese companies (including state-owned enterprises) to sue Canada over decisions that can limit or reduce their expectation of profits. This means China can claim damages against Canada for decisions at the municipal, provincial, territorial or federal level. Even decisions of our courts can give rise to damages.
It seems Harper is negotiating us back into Colonial Status.... here's a quote from a website following the story, and it is a good point;
When our government has the legal power under our Constitution to enter into deals over which our very own Supreme Court has no jurisdiction, then what distinguishes us from a colony?
Thoughts??
edit on 20-11-2012 by anon4m05 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SmedleyBurlap
Harper is neither an idiot nor a sellout.
Chinese state companies will invest in building mammoth infrastructure projects in Canada, that meet Canadian safety and industry regulations. China will rapidly develop what would take Canadians generations to build on their own. At the end of the 31-year deal, it all defaults back to Canadian control.
The Canadian supreme court will still hold sway over decisions on China-Canada trade. Harper is shrewd and will find a way to use the SC to his advantage, when necessary. These concessions to China are temporary, they are for the short-term, and are meant to fuel his greater plans for this country because American capital and politicians will not help him. China has to be appeased in order to accept this deal.
The only real way for the Chinese to enforce their control of these projects against Canadian government decisions is by projecting military might and/or freezing Canadian economic activity in China. Neither of these options really help China.
If they freeze Canadian assets then they will cause great damage to their own economy - - what's worse, suddenly they will have many thousands of workers who are no longer employed, and without constant, complete employment (slavery) the proletariat will have the time to rise up against the Communist Party. Even if they nationalise factories and kep people working, where will they ship the goods? Canadian capital and organization helps the Party maintain order and discipline.
If they project military power, they will find themselves in a world-war scenario. Britain, Australia and the USA would immediately leap to Canada's aid, and the Canadian military would itself be a formidable opponent - - Harper will invest oil royalties in expanding and upgrading the military.
If China doesn't play along with Harper, then they will lose their investments in Canada, and those projects will go to the benefit of Canada and the USA.
Originally posted by soficrow
reply to post by anon4m05
Canada prides itself on being a 'government-corporate' partnership, especially under Harper. I suspect many 'government-corporate' deals name the corporation as the 'capitol-investor.' ...NAFTA certainly allows corporations to override sovereignty.
Can you please explain what 'capitol-investor' means and implies?
Thanks, sofi
..Can you please explain 'government-corporate' partnership? lol