posted on Nov, 20 2012 @ 07:39 PM
So last term, we had Obama acting extremely diplomatically. That may have some of you thinking that he is not ready to handle a world war.
I, however, think he has the perfect mindset to be a leader during wartime. I get the feeling that he has the capability of making brilliant tactical
decisions and being ruthless on the battlefield, while sparing American lives. Although I am sure he will use diplomacy until the last opportunity, I
am also just as certain that he will not hesitate to act with military precision when he needs to.
In this particular situation, where we have a complete mess about to erupt, we could end up fighting Iran, Russia, China, Egypt, Syria and who knows
who else without much choice in the matter, even if diplomacy is used to its maximum potential.
In fact, there are alliances that could pull us into war today with Russia even though we are on somewhat friendly terms - just because two other
countries aren't getting along.
My main point is, does anyone on ATS honestly think that Mitt Romney would have been able to handle a World War better than Obama?
edit on 20-11-2012 by darkbake because: (no reason given)